Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output: SAMO 2004

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 91, Issue 10-11, 2006, Pages 1105-1108

  Helton, J C ^a   Cooke, R M ^b   McKay, M D ^c   Saltelli, A ^d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745699011     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.013     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Christie M.A., Glimm J., Grove J.W., Higdon D.M., Sharp D.H., and Wood-Schultz M.M. Error analysis and simulations of complex phenomena. Los Alamos Sci 29 (2005) 6-25
2. Saisana M., Saltelli A., and Tarantola S. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J Roy Statist Soc Ser-A 168 2 (2005) 307-323
3. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Tarantola S., and Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis for chemical models. Chem Rev 105 7 (2005) 2811-2828
4. Nikolaidis E, Ghiocel DM, Singhal S, editors. Engineering design reliability handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2004.
5. Sharp D.H., and Wood-Schultz M.M. QMU and nuclear weapons certification: what's under the hood?. Los Alamos Sci 28 (2003) 47-53
6. Wagner R.L. Science, uncertainty and risk: the problem of complex phenomena. APS News 12 1 (2003) 8
7. Oberkampf W.L., DeLand S.M., Rutherford B.M., Diegert K.V., and Alvin K.F. Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75 3 (2002) 333-357
8. Roache P.J. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering (1998), Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, NM
9. Ayyub BM, editor. Uncertainty modeling and analysis in civil engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1997.
10. Risk Assessment Forum. Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis, EPA/630/R-97/001. Washington DC: Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency (Available from the NTIS as PB97-188106/XAB), 1997.
11. Helton J.C., and Burmaster D.E. Guest editorial: treatment of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54 2-3 (1996) 91-94
12. NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements). A guide for uncertainty analysis in dose and risk assessments related to environmental contamination, NCRP Commentary no. 14 (1996), National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD
13. NRC (National Research Council). Science and judgment in risk assessment (1994), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
14. NRC (National Research Council). Issues in risk assessment (1993), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
15. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). An SAB report: multi-media risk assessment for radon, review of uncertainty analysis of risks associated with exposure to radon, EPA-SAB-RAC-93-014 (1993), US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
16. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). Evaluating the reliability of predictions made using environmental transfer models, Safety series no. 100 (1989), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
17. Scott E.M., and Saltelli A. SAMO'95, theory and applications of sensitivity analysis of model output in computer simulation. J Statist Comput Simulation 57 1-4 (1997) 1-364
18. Saltelli A., and Scott E.M. The role of sensitivity analysis in the corroboration of models and its links to model structural and parametric uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 57 (1997) 1-102
19. Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott E.M. Sensitivity analysis of model output, SAMO 98. Comput Phys Commun 117 (1999) 1-188
20. Tarantola S., and Saltelli A. SAMO 2001: methodological advances and innovative applications of sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79 (2003) 121-262