Sensitivity equations for hyperbolic conservation law-based flow models

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1943-1961

  Guinot, Vincent ^a   Leménager, Matthieu ^a   Cappelaere, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Godunov type schemes; Hyperbolic conservation laws; Kinematic wave; Model sensitivity; Riemann problem; Shock detection

Indexed keywords

FINITE VOLUME METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATER WAVES;

GODUNOV-TYPE SCHEMES; HYPERBOLIC CONSERVATION LAWS; KINEMATIC WAVE; MODEL SENSITIVITY; RIEMANN PROBLEM; SHOCK DETECTION PROCEDURE;

FLOW OF WATER;

FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOW OF WATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATER WAVES;

FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOW MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WAVE EQUATION;

EID: 34250661816     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson M.L., Bangerth W., and Carey G.F. Analysis of parameter sensitivity and experimental design for a class of nonlinear partial differential equations. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 48 (2005) 583-605
2. Atkinson A.C., and Donev A.N. Optimum experimental design (1992), Clarendon Press, Oxford
3. Bardos C., and Pironneau O. A formalism for the differentiation of conservation laws. C R Acad Sci I335 (2002) 839-845
4. Beven K. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Adv Water Resour 16 1 (1993) 41-51
5. Beven K. Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer (2001), Wiley, Chichester
6. Colella P., and Woodward P.R. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. J Comput Phys 54 (1984) 174-201
7. Courant R., and Friedrichs K.O. Supersonic flow and shock waves (1948), Interscience Publishers, New York
8. Cunge J.A., Holly Jr. F.M., and Verwey A. Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics (1980), Pitman Publishing
9. Fraidenraich A., Jacovkis P.M., and De Lima F.R.A. Sensitivity computations using first and second orders perturbative methods for the advection-diffusion-reaction model of pollutant transport. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 25 1 (2003) 23-29 10.1590/S1678-58782003000100004
10. Fraidenraich A., Jacovkis P.M., and Lima F.R.A. Sensitivity analysis of shallow water problems via perturbative methods. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 28 3 (2006) 286-292
11. Gejadze I.Y., and Copeland G.J.M. Adjoint sensitivity analysis for fluid flow with free surface. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 47 (2005) 1027-1034
12. Godunov. A difference method for the calculation of discontinuous solutions of hydrodynamics. Matematicheski Sbornik 47 (1959) 271-300
13. Griewank A. Evaluating derivatives: principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation (2000), SIAM, Philadelphia (PA)
14. Guinot V. The discontinuous profile method for simulating two-phase flow in pipes using the single component approximation. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 37 (2001) 341-359
15. Guinot V. Godunov-type schemes. an introduction for engineers (2003), Elsevier
16. Guinot V., and Gourbesville P. Calibration of physically-based models: back to basics?. J Hydroinformatics 5 (2003) 233-244
17. Gunzburger M.D. Sensitivities, adjoints and flow optimization. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 31 (1999) 53-78
18. Gunzburger M.D. Perspectives in flow control and optimization (2002), SIAM, Philadelphia (PA)
19. Gupta H.V., Beven K.J., and Wagener T. Model calibration and Uncertainty estimation. In: Anderson M.G., and Bates P.D. (Eds). Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences (2005), Wiley, New York [Chapter 131]
20. Kleiber M., Antúnez H., Hien T.D., and Kowalczyk P. Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics (1997), Wiley, New York
21. Lax P.D. Systems of conservation laws II. Comm Pure Appl Math 10 (1957) 537-566
22. LeVeque R.J. Numerical methods for conservation laws (1992), Birkhaüser, Basel
23. Lighthill M.J., and Whitham G.B. On kinematic waves. I. Flood movement in long rivers. Proc R Soc A 229 (1955) 281-316
24. Pázman A. Foundations of optimum experimental design (1986), Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht
25. Singh V.H. Kinematic-wave modelling in water resources (1997), Wiley, New York
26. Soares-Frazão S., and Guinot V. An eigenvector-based linear reconstruction scheme for the shallow-water equations on two-dimensional unstructured meshes. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 53 (2007) 23-55
27. Stoker J.J.R. Water waves (1957), Interscience
28. Van Leer B. Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection. J Comput Phys 23 (1977) 276-299
29. Vasseur A. Well-posedness of scalar conservation laws with singular sources. Meth Appl Anal 9 (2002) 291-312
30. Whitham G.B. Linear and nonlinear waves (1974), Wiley, New York
31. Wu J., Zheng C., Chien C.C., and Zheng L. A comparative study of Monte Carlo simple genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm for cost-effective sampling network design under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 29 (2006) 899-911
32. Zhang D., Beven K., and Mermoud A. A comparison of non-linear least square and GLUE for model calibration and uncertainty estimation for pesticide transport in soils. Adv Water Resour 29 (2006) 1924-1933