To scroll or not to scroll: Scrolling, working memory capacity, and comprehending complex texts

Human Factors

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 730-738

  Sanchez, Christopher A ^a   Wiley, Jennifer ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN INTERFACE; LEARNING OUTCOME; USER CHARACTERISTICS; WEB PAGE; WORKING MEMORIES;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; SHORT TERM MEMORY; UNITED STATES;

COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 76049110818     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720809352788     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G.J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
2. Bernard, M.L., Baker, J.R., & Fernandez, M. (2002). Paging vs. scrolling: Looking for the best way to present search results. Usability News, 4. Retrieved July 28, 2009, from http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/41/paging.asp
3. ClickTale. (2006). Unfolding the fold. Retrieved July 28, 2009, from http://blog.clicktale.com/2006/12/23/unfolding-the-fold/
4. Conway, A.R.A., & Engle, R.W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354-373.
5. Conway, A.R.A., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F., Hambrick, D.Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R.W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and userĝs guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 769-786.
6. Conway, A.R.A., Kane, M.J., & Engle, R.W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 547-552.
7. Duchnicky, R.L., & Kolers, P.A. (1983). Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size. Human Factors, 25, 683-692.
8. Gernsbacher, M.A., Varner, K.R., & Faust, M.E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430-445.
9. Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 161-195.
10. Lorch, R.F., Jr., & Lorch, E.P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 38-48.
11. Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
12. Monk, A.F., Walsh, P., & Dix, A.J. (1988). A comparison of hyper-text, scrolling and folding as mechanisms for program browsing. In D. M. Jones & R. Winder (Eds.), People and Computers IV: Proceedings of the fourth conference of the British Computer Society (pp. 421-435). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1-4.
14. Piolat, A., Roussey, J.Y., & Thunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 565-589.
15. Sanchez, C.A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34, 344-355.
16. Spool, J., Scanlon, T., Schroeder, W., Snyder, C., & DeAngelo, T. (1999). Web site usability: A designerĝs guide. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
17. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176-192.
18. Turner, M.L., & Engle, R.W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent ? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
19. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R.P., Schrock, J.C., & Engle, R.W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498-505.
20. van MerriÃnboer, J.J.G., Kirschner, P.A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learnerĝs mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5-13.
21. van Nimwegen, C., Pouw, M., & van Oostendorp, H. (1999). The influence of structure and reading-manipulation on usability of hypertexts. Interacting With Computers, 12, 7-21.
22. Wiley, J. (2001). Supporting understanding through task and browser design. In Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1136-1143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Wiley, J., Sanchez, C.A., & Moher, T. (2005). Research in instructional technology. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), The impact of the cognitive revolution on educational psychology (pp. 231-248). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.