Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 565-589

  Piolat, Annie ^a   Roussey, Jean Yves ^a   Thunin, Olivier ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; USER INTERFACES;

TEXT PRESENTATION;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 0031250846     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1997.0145     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BACCINO, T. & PYNTE, J. (1991). Le codage spatial dans la lecture [Spatial coding in reading]. L'Année Psychologique, 91, 231-245.
2. BACCINO, T. & PYNTE, J. (1994). Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 143-155.
3. BARKER, T.T. (1987). Studies in word processing and writing. Computers in the School, 4, 109-121.
4. BEREITER, C. & SCARDAMALIA, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. BRIDWELL, L. S., JOHNSON, P. & BREHE, S. (1987). Computers and composing: Case studies of experienced writers. In A. MATSUHASHI, Ed. Writing in real time: Modelling Production Processes, pp. 81-107. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. CHRISTIE, J. & JUST, M. A. (1976). Remembering the location and content of sentences in a prose passage. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 702-711.
7. DAIUTE, C. (1985). Writing and Computers. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. DANMAN, M. & STAINTON, M. (1993). The generation effect in reading and proofreading. Is it easier or harder to detect errors in one's own writing? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 297-313.
9. DE BRUIJN, D., DE MUL, S. & VAN OOSTENDORP, H. (1992). The influence of screen size and text layout on the study of text. Behaviour & Information Technology, 11, 71-78.
10. DILLON, A. (1991). Reader's models of text structures: the case of academic articles. International Journal Man-Machine Studies, 35, 913-925.
11. DILLON, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35, 1297-1326.
12. DILLON, A., RICHARDSON, J. & MC KNIGHT, C. (1990). The effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 9, 215-227.
13. DUCHNICKY, R. L. & KOLERS, P. A. (1983). Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size. Human Factors, 25, 683-692.
14. EHRLICH, M. F. (1994). Mémoire et Compréhension du Langage [Memory and Language Comprehension]. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
15. ESPÉRET, E. & PIOLAT, A. (1990). Production: planning and control. In G. DENHIÈRE & J. P. ROSSI, Eds. Texts and Text Processing, pp. 317-331. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. FITZGERALD, J. (1992). Towards Knowledge in Writing. Illustrations from Revision Studies. New York: Springer.
17. GOULD, J. D., ALFARO, L., FINN, R., HAUPT, B. & MINUTO, A. (1987). Reading from CRT displays can be as fast as reading from paper. Human Factors, 29, 497-517.
18. GRAY, S. H., BRADFORD BARBER, C. & SHASHA, D. (1991). Information with dynamic text vs. paper text: an empirical comparison. International Journal Man-Machine Studies, 35, 575-586.
19. HANSEN, W. J. & HAAS, C. (1988). Reading and writing with computers: a framework for explaining differences in performance. Communications of the ACM, 31, 1080-1089.
20. HAAS, C. (1989). How the writing medium shapes the writing process: effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 181-207.
21. HAAS, C. & HAYES, J. R. (1986). What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 22-35.
22. HAWISHER, G. E. (1989). Research and recommendations for computers and composition. In G. E. HAWISHER &C. L. SELFE, Eds. Critical Perspectives on Computers and Composition Instruction, pp. 44-69. New York: Teachers' College Press.
23. HAYES, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. LEVY & S. RANSDELL, Eds. The Science of Writing, pp. 1-28. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. HAYES, J. R., FLOWER, L. S., SCHRIVER, K., STRATMAN, J. & CAREY, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. ROSENBERG, Ed. Reading, Writing and Language Learning (Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics), Vol. 2, pp. 196-240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. KENNEDY, A. & MURRAY, W. S. (1987). Spatial coordinates and reading: comments on Monk (1985). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 649-656.
26. LOVELACE, E. A. & SOUTHALL, S. D. (1983). Memory for words in prose and their locations on the page. Memory and Cognition, 11, 429-434.
27. LUTZ, J. A. (1987). A study of professional and experienced writers revising and editing at the computer and with pen and paper. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 398-421.
28. MILLS, C. B. & WELDON, J. L. (1986). Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computing Surveys, 19, 329-358.
29. MUTER, P. & MAURUTTO, P. (1991). Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: The paperless office revisited? Behaviour & Information Technology, 10, 257-266.
30. NEALS, A. S. & DARNELL, M. J. (1984). Text-editing performance with partial-line, partial-page and full-page displays. Human Factors 26, 431-441.
31. OWSTON, R. D., MURPHY, S. & WIDEMAN, H. H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students' writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 249-276.
32. PIOLAT, A. & BLAYE, A. (1991). Effect of word processing and writing aids on revision proceses. In M. CARRETERO, M. POPE, R. SIMONS & J. POZO, Eds. Learning and Instruction. European Research in an International Context, Vol. III, pp. 379-399. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
33. PIOLAT, A. & ROUSSEY, J. Y. (1992). Rédaction de texte. Eléments de psychologie cognitive [Text writing. Cognitive psychology approach]. Langages, 106, 106-125.
34. PIOLAT, A. (1991). Effects of word processing on text revision. Language and Education, 5, 255-272.
35. PIOLAT, A., ISNARD, N. & DELLA VALLE, V. (1993). Traitement de Texte et stratégies rédactionnelles [Word processor and writing strategies]. Le Travail humain, 56, 79-89.
36. PLUMB, C., BUTTERFIELD, E. C., HACKER, D. J. & DUNLOSKY, J. (1994). Error correction in text. Testing the processing-deficit and knowledge-deficit hypotheses. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 347-360.
37. PYNTE, J., KENNEDY, A., MURRAY, N. S. & COURRIEU, P. (1988). The effects of spatialisation on the processing of ambiguous pronominal reference. In G. LUER, H. LASS & J. SHALLO-HOFFMANN, Eds. Eye Movement Research, pp. 214-225. New York: Hograje.
38. ROTHKOPF, E. Z. (1971). Incidental memory and the recall of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10, 608-613.
39. SCHWARZ, E., BELDIE, I. P. & PASTOOR, S. (1983). A comparison of paging and scrolling for changing screen contents by inexperienced users. Human Factors, 25, 279-282.
40. SEVERINSON EKLUNDH, K. & SJÎHOLM, C. (1991). Writing with a computer: a longitudinal study of writers of technical documents. International Journal Man-Machine Studies, 35, 723-749.
41. SEVERINSON EKLUNDH, K. (1992). Problems in achieving a global perspective of the text in computer-based writing. Instructional Science, 21, 73-84.
42. SMITH, A. P. & SAVORY, M. (1989). Effects and after-effects of working at a VDU: investigation of the influence of personal variables. In E. D. MEGAW, Ed. Contemporary Ergonomics, pp. 252-257. London: Taylor & Francis.
43. SNYDER, I. (1993). Writing with word processors: a research overview. Educational Research, 35, 49-68.
44. SWANSTON, M. T., WADE, N. J. & DAY, R. H. (1987). The representation of uniform motion in vision. Perception, 16, 143-159.
45. TOMBAUGH, J., LICKORISH, A. & WRIGHT, P. (1987). Multi-window displays for readers of lengthy texts. International Journal Man - Machine Studies, 26, 597-615.
46. VAN DIJK, T. A. & KINTSCH, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
47. VAN HAALEN, T. & BRIGHT, G. W. (1993). Writing and revising by bilingual students in traditional and word processing environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 313-328.
48. WILKINSON, R. T. & ROBINSHAW, H. M. (1987). Proof-reading: VDU and paper testcompared for speed, accuracy and fatigue. Behaviour and Information Technology, 6, 125-133.
49. WITTE, S. P. (1985). Revising, composing theory and research design. In S. W. FREEDMAN, Ed. The Acquisition of Written Language: Response and Revision, pp. 250-284. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.