A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 588-593

  Yang, Eunice ^a   Blake, Randolph ^a   McDonald II, James E ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Eye Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTEROCULAR SUPPRESSION TEST; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; ADOLESCENT; BINOCULAR VISION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 75749134596     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3076     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford Claridon; 1995.
2. Suttle C, Alexander J, Liu M, Ng S, Poon J, Tran T. Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92(1):2-8.
3. Evans BJW. Monovision: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(5):417-439.
4. Walls GL. A theory of ocular dominance. Arch Ophthalmol. 1951;45(4):387-412.
5. Seijas O, Gomez de Liano P, Gomez de Liano R, Roberts CJ, Piedrahita E, Diaz E. Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(2):209-216.
6. Coren S, Kaplan CP. Patterns of ocular dominance. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973;50(4):283-292.
7. Purves D, White LE. Monocular preferences in binocular viewing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(18):8339-8342.
8. Porac C, Coren S. The dominant eye. Psychol Bull. 1976;83(5):880-897.
9. Barbeito R. Sighting dominance: an explanation based on the processing of visual direction in tests of sighting dominance. Vision Res. 1981;21(6):855-860.
10. Menon RS, Ogawa S, Strupp JP, Ugurbil K. Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77(5):2780-2787.
11. Washburn MF, Faison C, Scott R. A comparison between the Miles A-B-C method and retinal rivalry as tests of ocular dominance. Am J Psychol. 1934;46:633-636.
12. Ooi TL, Optom B, He ZJ. Sensory eye dominance. Optometry. 2001;72(3):168-178.
13. Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, Niida T, Shoji N, Shimizu K. Effects of dominant and nondominant eyes in binocular rivalry. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(5):377-383.
14. Valle-Inclán F, Blanco MJ, Soto D, Leiros L. A new method to assess eye dominance. Psicológica. 2008;29:55-64.
15. Porac C, Coren S. Sighting dominance and binocular rivalry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55(3):208-213.
16. Lee SH, Blake R. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 1999;39(8):1447-1454.
17. Borish IM. Clinical Refraction. 3rd ed. New York: Professional Press Books; 1970.
18. Wolfe JM. Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception. 1983;12(4):447-456.
19. Leonards U, Sireteanu R. Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: the effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters. Percept Psychophys. 1993;54(1):65-74.
20. Blake R, Yang Y, Westendorf D. Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(10):2821-2825.
21. Tsuchiya N, Koch C. Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(8):1096-1101.
22. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997;10:433-436.
23. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997;10:437-442.
24. Pointer JS. The absence of lateral congruency between sighting dominance and the eye with better visual acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(1):106-110.
25. O'Shea RP, Sims AJ, Govan DG. The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 1997;37(2):175-183.
26. Blake R, Logothetis NK. Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(1):13-21.
27. Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, et al. Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(4):769-774.
28. Kommerell G, Schmitt C, Kromeier M, Bach M. Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance. Vision Res. 2003;43(12):1397-1403.
29. Mapp AP, Ono H, Barbeito R. What does the dominant eye dominate?-a brief and somewhat contentious review. Percept Psychophys. 2003;65(2):310-317.
30. Kirschen DG, Hung CC, Nakano TR. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and Acuvue bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(12):832-837.
31. Simpson T. The suppression effect of simulated anisometropia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1991;11(4):350-358.
32. Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(10):723-730.
33. Handa T, Uozato H, Higa R, et al. Quantitative measurement of ocular dominance using binocular rivalry induced by retinometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(5):831-836.
34. Collins MJ, Goode A. Interocular blur suppression and monovision. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994;72(3):376-380.
35. Ogle KN. Ocular dominance and binocular retinal rivalry. In: The Eye. Davson H, ed. New York: Academic Press; 1962:409-417.
36. Humphriss, D. Binocular refraction. In: Edwards KN, Lewellyn RD, eds. Optometry. London: Butterworths; 1988:130-149.