Quantitative measurement of ocular dominance using binocular rivalry induced by retinometers

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 831-836

  Handa, Tomoya ^a   Uozato, Hiroshi ^a   Higa, Risako ^a   Nitta, Marie ^a   Kawamorita, Takushi ^a   Ishikawa, Hitoshi ^a   Shoji, Nobuyuki ^a   Shimizu, Kimiya ^a  

^a KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CATARACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; EYE; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OPTOMETER; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFRACTION ERROR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETINA; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VISIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 33744946527     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.082     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cheng C.-Y., Yen M.-Y., Lin H.-Y., et al. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 2856-2860
2. Ibi K. Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17 (1997) 44-54
3. Han Y., Seideman M., and Lennerstrand G. Dynamics of accommodative vergence movements controlled by the dominant and non-dominant eye. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 73 (1995) 319-324
4. Lin S.Y., and White G.E. Mandibular position and head posture as a function of eye dominance. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20 (1996) 133-140
5. Kawata H., and Ohtsuka K. Dynamic asymmetries in convergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions. Jpn J Ophthalmol 45 (2001) 437-444
6. Coren S., and Duckman R.H. Ocular dominance and amblyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 52 (1975) 47-50
7. Waheed K., and Laidlaw D.A.H. Disease laterality, eye dominance, and visual handicap in patients with unilateral full thickness macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol 87 (2003) 626-628
8. Jain S., Arora I., and Azar D.T. Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 40 (1996) 491-499
9. Handa T., Mukuno K., Uozato H., et al. Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 769-774
10. Wright K.W., Guemes A., Kapadia M.S., and Wilson S.E. Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 177-182
11. Jain S., Ou R., and Azar D.T. Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 1430-1433
12. Gauthier C.A., Holden B.A., Grant T., and Chong M.S. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision. Optom Vis Sci 69 (1992) 858-862
13. Greenbaum S. Monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1439-1443
14. Handa T., Mukuno K., Uozato H., et al. Effects of dominant and nondominant eyes in binocular rivalry. Optom Vis Sci 81 (2004) 377-382 errata, 563
15. Halliday B.L., and Ross J.E. Comparison of 2 interferometers for predicting visual acuity in patients with cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 67 (1983) 273-277
16. Minkowski J.S., Palese M., and Guyton D.L. Potential Acuity Meter using a minute aerial pinhole aperture. Ophthalmology 90 (1983) 1360-1368
17. Datiles M.B., Edwards P.A., Kaiser-Kupfer M.I., et al. A comparative study between the PAM and the laser interferometer in cataract. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225 (1987) 457-460
18. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. Sensory eye dominance. Optometry 72 (2001) 168-178
19. Blake R., and Camisa J. On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5 (1979) 31-323
20. Porac C., and Coren S. Sighting dominance and binocular rivalry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 55 (1978) 208-213
21. Schor C., Landsman L., and Erickson P. Ocular dominance and interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64 (1987) 723-730
22. Robboy M.W., Cox I.G., and Erickson P. Effects of sighting and sensory dominance on monovision high and low contrast visual acuity. CLAO J 16 (1990) 299-301
23. Sippel K.C., Jain S., and Azar D.T. Monovision achieved with excimer laser refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 41 (2001) 91-101