Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 2-8

  Suttle, Catherine ^a   Alexander, Jack ^a   Liu, Miriam ^a   Ng, Stephanie ^a   Poon, Jacqueline ^a   Tran, Thu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Acuity; Alignment sensitivity; Contrast sensitivity; Monovision; Ocular dominance; Sensory; Sighting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149164730     PISSN: 08164622     EISSN: 14440938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00312.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Coren S, Kaplan CP. Patterns of ocular dominance. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1973 50 : 283 292.
2. Walls GL. A theory of ocular dominance. Arch Ophthalmol 1951 45 : 387 412.
3. Cuff NB. A study of eyedness and handedness. J Exp Psychol 1931 14 : 164 175.
4. Porac C, Coren S. Is eye dominance a part of generalized lateralization? Percept Mot Skills 1975 40 : 763 769.
5. Seijas O, Gomez de Liano P, Gomez De Liano R, Roberts CJ, Piedrahita E, Diaz E. Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. Am J Ophthalmol 2007 144 : 209 216.
6. Porac C, Whitford FW, Coren S. The relationship between eye dominance and monocular acuity: an additional consideration. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976 53 : 803 806.
7. Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Sprenger M, Valk J, Scheltens P. The functional basis of ocular dominance: functional MRI (fMRI) findings. Neurosci Lett 1996 221 : 1 4.
8. Mendola JD, Conner IP. Eye dominance predicts fMRI signals in human retinotopic cortex. Neurosci Lett 2007 414 : 30 34.
9. Banks MS, Ghose T, Hillis JM. Relative image size, not eye position, determines eye dominance switches. Vision Res 2004 44 : 229 234.
10. Mapp AP, Ono H, Barbeito R. What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Percept Psychophys 2003 65 : 310 317.
11. Lederer J. Brainedness, handedness and eyedness: The meaning of ocular dominance. Aust J Optom 1970 53 : 323 347.
12. McMonnies CW. Monocular fogging in contact lens practice. Aust J Optom 1974 57 : 28 32.
13. Evans BJ. Monovision: A review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007 27 : 417 439.
14. Ooi TL, He ZJ. Sensory eye dominance. Optometry 2001 72 : 168 177.
15. Shneor E, Hochstein S. Eye dominance effects in feature search. Vision Res 2006 46 : 4258 4269.
16. Ellingham RB, Waldock A, Harrad RA. Visual disturbance of the uncovered eye in patients wearing an eye patch. Eye 1993 7 : 775 778.
17. Vedamurthy I, Suttle CM, Alexander J, Asper LJ. Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults and in adults with amblyopia. Vision Res 2007 47 : 179 188.
18. Spry PG, Furber JE, Harrad RA. The effect of ocular dominance on visual field testing. Optom Vis Sci 2002 79 : 93 97.
19. Khan AZ, Crawford JD. Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vision Res 2001 41 : 1743 1748.