The El tor biotype of Vibrio cholerae exhibits a growth advantage in the stationary phase in mixed cultures with the classical biotype

Journal of Bacteriology

Volumn 192, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 955-963

  Pradhan, Subhra ^a   Baidya, Amit K ^a   Ghosh, Amalendu ^b   Paul, Kalidas ^c   Chowdhury, Rukhsana ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY   (India)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; CHOLERA; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ILEUM; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; STRAIN IDENTIFICATION; VIBRIO CHOLERAE;

AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CHOLERA; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CULTURE MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; ILEUM; MICE; PEPTIDE HYDROLASES; RABBITS; VIBRIO CHOLERAE O1; VIRULENCE;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS; VIBRIO CHOLERAE;

EID: 75749104144     PISSN: 00219193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01180-09     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abuaita, B. H., and J. H. Withey. 2009. Bicarbonate induces Vibrio cholerae virulence gene expression by enhancing ToxT activity. Infect. Immun. 77: 4111-4120.
2. Barrett, T. J., and P. A. Blake. 1981. Epidemiological usefulness of changes in hemolytic activity of Vibrio cholerae biotype El Tor during the seventh pandemic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 13:126-129.
3. Beyhan, S., A. D., Tischler, A. Camilli, and F. H. Yildiz. 2006. Differences in gene expression between the classical and El Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae O1. Infect. Immun. 74:3633-3642.
4. Biswas, S. K., R. Chowdhury, and J. Das. 1992. A 14-kilodalton inner membrane protein of Vibrio cholerae biotype El Tor confers resistance to group IV choleraphage infection to classical vibrios. J. Bacteriol. 174:6221-6229.
5. Calia, K. E., M. Murtagh, M. J. Ferraro, and S. B. Calderwood. 1994. Comparison of Vibrio cholerae O139 with V. cholerae O1 classical and El Tor biotypes. Infect. Immun. 62:1504-1506.
6. Chowdhury, R., S. K. Biswas, and J. Das. 1989. Abortive replication of choleraphage φ149 in Vibrio cholerae biotype El Tor. J. Virol. 63:392-397.
7. De, S. N., and S. N. Chatterjee. 1953. An experimental study of the mechanisms of action of Vibrio cholerae on the intestinal mucous membrane. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 46:559-562.
8. DiRita, V. J., M. Neely, R. K. Taylor, and P. M. Bruss. 1996. Differential expression of the ToxR regulon in classical and E1 Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae is due to biotype-specific control over toxT expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:7991-7995.
9. Dziejman, M., E. Balon, D. Boyd, C. M. Fraser, J. F. Heidelberg, and J. J. Mekalanos. 2002. Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio cholerae: genes that correlate with cholera endemic and pandemic disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:1556-1561.
10. Farrell, M. J., and S. E. Finkel. 2003. The growth advantage in stationary phase phenotype conferred by rpoS mutations is dependent on the pH and nutrient environment. J. Bacteriol. 185:7044-7052.
11. Faruque, S. M., M. J. Albert, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1998. Epidemiology, genetics, and ecology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1301-1314.
12. Finkel, S. E. 2006. Long-term survival during stationary phase: evolution and the GASP phenotype. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:113-120.
13. Han, G. K., and T. S. Khie. 1963. A new method for differentiation of Vibrio comma and Vibrio El Tor. Am. J. Hyg. 77:184-186.
14. Jonson, G., J. Sanchez, and A. M. Svennerholm. 1989. Expression and detection of different biotype-associated cell-bound haemagglutinins of Vibrio cholerae O1. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:111-120.
15. Kovacikova, G., W. Lin, and K. Skorupski. 2005. Dual regulation of genes involved in acetoin biosynthesis and motility/biofilm formation by the virulence activator AphA and the acetate-responsive LysR-type regulator AlsR in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 57:420-433.
16. Kovacikova, G., and K. Skorupski. 2000. Differential activation of the tcpPH promoter by AphB determines biotype specificity of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 182:3228-3238.
17. Matson J. S., J. H. Withey, and V. J. DiRita. 2007. Regulatory networks controlling Vibrio cholerae virulence gene expression. Infect. Immun. 75: 5542-5549.
18. McFall, E., and E. B. Newman. 1996. Amino acids as carbon sources, p. 358-379. In F. C. Neidhardt et al. (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
19. Murley, Y. M., J. Behari, R. Griffin, and S. B. Calderwood. 2000. Classical and El Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae differ in timing of transcription of tcpPH during growth in inducing conditions. Infect. Immun. 68:3010-3014.
20. Paul, K., A. Ghosh, N. Sengupta, and R. Chowdhury. 2004. Competitive growth advantage of non-toxigenic mutants in the stationery phase in archival cultures of pathogenic Vibrio cholerae strains. Infect. Immun. 72:5478-5482.
21. Pepper, E. D., M. J. Farrell, and S. E. Finkel. 2006. Role of penicillin-binding protein 1b in competitive stationary phase survival of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 263:61-67.
22. Ramamurthy, T., S. Garg, R. Sharma, S. K. Bhattacharya, G. B. Nair, T. Shimada, T. Takeda, T. Karasawa, H. Kurazano, A. Pal, and Y. Takeda. 1993. Emergence of novel strain of Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential in southern and eastern India. Lancet 341:703-704.
23. Richardson, K., J. Michalski, and J. B. Kaper. 1986. Hemolysin production and cloning of two hemolysin determinants from classical Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 54:415-420.
24. Roth, M. 1971. Fluorescence reaction for amino acids. Anal. Chem. 43:880-882.
25. Sack, D. A., R. B. Sack, G. B. Nair, and A. K. Siddique. 2004. Cholera. Lancet 363:223-233.
26. Schneider, D. R., S. P. Sigel, and C. D. Parker. 1981. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae protease activities with peptide digest analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 13:80-84.
27. Takeya, K., T. Otohuji, and H. Tokiwa. 1981. FK phage for differentiating the classical and El Tor groups of Vibrio cholerae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 14:222-224.
28. Yeiser, B., E. D. Pepper, M. F. Goodman, and S. E. Finkel. 2002. SOS induced DNA polymerases enhance long-term survival and evolutionary fitness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:8737-8741.
29. Yoon, S. S., and J. J. Mekalanos. 2006. 2,3-Butanediol synthesis and the emergence of the Vibrio cholerae El Tor biotype. Infect. Immun. 74:6547-6556.
30. Zambrano, M. M., and R. Kolter. 1996. GASPing for life in stationary phase. Cell 86:181-184.
31. Zambrano, M. M., D. A. Siegele, M. Almiron, A. Tormo, and R. Kolter. 1993. Microbial competition: Escherichia coli mutants that take over stationary phase cultures. Science 259:1757-1760.
32. Zinser, E. R., and R. Kolter. 1999. Mutations enhancing amino acid catabolism confer a growth advantage in stationary phase. J. Bacteriol. 181:5800-5807.