Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Lung Nodules on CT Scans:. ROC Study of Its Effect on Radiologists' Performance

Academic Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 323-332

  Way, Ted ^a   Chan, Heang Ping ^a   Hadjiiski, Lubomir ^a   Sahiner, Berkman ^a   Chughtai, Aamer ^a   Song, Thomas K ^b   Poopat, Chad ^b   Stojanovska, Jadranka ^a   Frank, Luba ^a   Attili, Anil ^a   Bogot, Naama ^a   Cascade, Philip N ^a   Kazerooni, Ella A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LUNG BIOPSY; LUNG NODULE; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METASTASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 75749101786     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Sone S., Takashima S., Li F., et al. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 351 (1998) 1242-1245
2. Henschke C.I., McCauley D.I., Yankelevitz D.F., et al. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354 (1999) 99-105
3. Nawa T., Nakagawa T., Kusano S., et al. Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT: results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies. Chest 122 (2002) 15-20
4. Diederich S., Wormanns D., Semik M., et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222 (2002) 773-781
5. Henschke C.I., Yankelevitz D.F., Libby D.M., et al. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 1763-1771
6. Sobue T., Moriyama N., Kaneko M., et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. J Clin Oncol 20 (2002) 911-920
7. Gierada D.S., Pilgram T.K., Ford M., et al. Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. Radiology 246 (2008) 265-272
8. Swensen S.J., Jett J.R., Hartman T.E., et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 226 (2003) 756-761
9. Das M., Muhlenbruch G., Mahnken A.H., et al. Small pulmonary nodules: Effect of two computer-aided detection systems on radiologist performance. Radiology 241 (2006) 564-571
10. Brown M.S., Goldin J.G., Rogers S., et al. Computer-aided lung nodule detection in CT results of large-scale observer test. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 681-686
11. Awai K., Murao K., Ozawa A., et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 230 (2004) 347-352
12. Armato S., Li F., Giger M., et al. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 225 (2002) 685-692
13. Li F., Arimura H., Suzuki K., et al. Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization. Radiology 237 (2005) 684-690
14. Sahiner B., Hadjiiski L.M., Chan H.P., et al. The effect of nodule segmentation on the accuracy of computerized lung nodule detection on CT scans: comparison on a data set annotated by multiple radiologists. Proc SPIE 6514 (2007) 65140L-65141L 65147
15. Way T.W., Hadjiiski L.M., Sahiner B., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: segmentation and classification using 3D active contours. Med Phys 33 (2006) 2323-2337
16. Shah S.K., McNitt-Gray M.F., Rogers S.R., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 570-575
17. McNitt-Gray M.F., Hart E.M., Wyckoff N., Sayre J.W., Goldin J.G., and Aberle D.R. A pattern classification approach to characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on high resolution CT: preliminary results. Med Phys 26 (1999) 880-888
18. Armato S.G., Altman M.B., and Wilkie J. Automated lung nodule classification following automated nodule detection on CT: a serial approach. Med Phys 30 (2003) 1188-1197
19. Kawata Y., Niki N., Ohmatsu H., et al. Quantitative surface characterization of pulmonary nodules based on thin-section CT images. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 45 (1998) 2132-2138
20. Lo S.C.B., Hsu L.Y., Freedman M.T., et al. Classification of lung nodules in diagnostic CT: an approach based on 3-D vascular features, nodule density distributions, and shape features. Proc SPIE 5032 (2003) 183-189
21. Li F., Aoyama M., Shiraishi J., et al. Radiologists' performance for differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 1209-1215
22. Aoyama M., Li Q., Katsuragawa S., et al. Computerized scheme for determination of the likelihood measure of malignancy for pulmonary nodules on low-dose CT images. Med Phys 30 (2003) 387-394
23. Suzuki K., Li F., Sone S., and Doi K. Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for distinction between benign and malignant nodules in thoracic low-dose CT by use of massive training artificial neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24 (2005) 1138-1150
24. Matsuki Y., Nakamura K., Watanabe H., et al. Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 (2002) 657-663
25. Shah S.K., McNitt-Gray M.F., De Zoysa K.R., et al. Solitary pulmonary nodule diagnosis on CT results of an observer study. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 496-501
26. Li F., Li Q., Engelmann R., et al. Improving radiologists' recommendations with computer-aided diagnosis for management of small nodules detected by CT. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 943-950
27. Awai K., Murao K., Ozawa A., et al. Pulmonary nodules: Estimation of malignancy at thin-section helical CT-effect of computer-aided diagnosis on performance of radiologists. Radiology 239 (2006) 276-284
28. Way T.W., Sahiner B., Chan H.-P., et al. Computer aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: improvement of classification performance with nodule surface features. Med Phys 36 (2009) 3086-3098
29. Sahiner B., Chan H.P., Petrick N., et al. Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis. Med Phys 25 (1998) 516-526
30. Galloway M.M. Texture classification using gray level run lengths. Comput Graph Image Process 4 (1975) 172-179
31. Dasarathy B.R., and Holder E.B. Image characterizations based on joint gray-level run-length distributions. Patt Recog Lett 12 (1991) 497-502
32. Ge Z., Sahiner B., Chan H.P., et al. Computer aided detection of lung nodules: false positive reduction using a 3D gradient field method and 3D ellipsoid fitting. Med Phys 32 (2005) 2443-2454
33. Metz C.E. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24 (1989) 234-245
34. Dorfman D.D., Berbaum K.S., and Metz C.E. ROC rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27 (1992) 723-731
35. Jiang Y., Metz C.E., and Nishikawa R.M. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. Radiology 201 (1996) 745-750
36. Sahiner B., Chan H.P., Petrick N., et al. Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis. Phys Med Biol 43 (1998) 2853-2871
37. Obuchowski N. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 53 (1997) 567-578
38. Lee M.-L.T., and Rosner B.A. The average area under correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach based on generalized two-sample Wilcoxon statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 50 (2001) 337-344
39. Hadjiiski L.M., Chan H.P., Sahiner B., et al. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms. Radiology 240 (2006) 343-356
40. Li Q., Li F., Shiraishi J., Katsuragawa S., et al. Investigation of new psychophysical measures for evaluation of similar images on thoracic computed tomography for distinction between benign and malignant nodules. Med Phys 30 (2003) 2584-2593
41. Gurney J.W. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis-part I. Theory. Radiology 186 (1993) 405-413
42. Bogot N.R., Kazerooni E.A., Kelly A.M., et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 948-956
43. Meyer C.R., Johnson T.D., McLennan G., et al. Evaluation of lung MDCT nodule annotation across radiologists and methods. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 1254-1265
44. Jiang Y., Nishikawa R.M., Schmidt R.A., et al. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 220 (2001) 787-794
45. Gur D., Bandos A.I., Cohen C.S., et al. The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations. Radiology 249 (2008) 47-53