Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: Application to computer-aided diagnosis

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 2853-2871

  Sahiner, Berkman ^a   Chan, Heang Ping ^a   Petrick, Nicholas ^a   Helvie, Mark A ^a   Goodsitt, Mitchell M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0031710635     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brill F, Brown D and Martin W 1992 Fast genetic selection of features for neural network classifiers IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 3 324-8
2. Brzakovic D, Luo X M and Brzakovic P 1990 An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 9 233-41
3. Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Petrick N, Helvie M A, Lam K L, Adler D D and Goodsitt M M 1997a Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network Phys. Med. Biol. 42 549-67
4. Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Wagner R F, Petrick N and Mossoba J 1997b Effects of sample size on classifier design: quadratic and neural network classifiers Proc. SPIE 3034 1102-13
5. Chan H-P, Wei D, Helvie M A, Sahiner B, Adler D D, Goodsitt M M and Petrick N 1995 Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space Phys. Med. Biol. 40 857-76
6. Duda R O and Hart P E 1973 Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis (New York: Wiley)
7. Galloway M M 1975 Texture classification using grey level run lengths Comput. Graphics Image Process. 4 172-9
8. Hall F M, Storella J M, Silverstone D Z and Wyshak G 1988 Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography Radiology 167 353-8
9. Haralick R M, Shanmugam K and Dinstein I 1973 Texture features for image classification IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 3 610-21
10. Hermann G, Janus C, Schwartz I S, Krivisky B, Bier S and Rabinowitz J G 1987 Nonpalpable breast lesions: accuracy of prebiopsy mammographic diagnosis Radiology 165 323-6
11. Huo Z, Giger M L, Vyborny C J, Bick U, Lu P, Wolverton D E and Schmidt R A 1995 Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses Med. Phys. 22 1569-79
12. Jacobson H G and Edeiken J 1990 Biopsy of occult breast lesions: analysis of 1261 abnormalities J. Am. Med. Assoc. 263 2341-3
13. Jain A K 1989 Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall)
14. Jiang Y, Metz C E and Nishikawa R M 1996 A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests Radiology 201 745-50
15. Kilday J, Palmieri F and Fox M D 1993 Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 12 664-9
16. Lachenbruch P A 1975 Discriminant Analysis (New York: Hafner)
17. McClish D K 1989 Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve Med. Decision Making 9 190-5
18. Metz C E, Herman B A and Shen J H 1998 Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data Stat. Med. 17 1033-53
19. Pohlman S, Powell K A, Obuchowski N A, Chilcote W A and Broniatowski S G 1996 Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms Med. Phys. 23 1337-45
20. Rangayyan R M, El-Faramawy N, Desautels J E L and Alim O A 1996 Discrimination between benign and malignant breast tumors using a region-based measure of edge profile acutance Digital Mammography '96 ed K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa and R A Schmidt (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 213-18
21. Raudys S J and Jain A K 1991 Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: recommendations for practitioners IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 13 252-64
22. Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N, Goodsitt M M and Helvie M A 1997 Characterization of masses on mammograms: significance of the use of the rubber-band straightening transform Proc. SPIE 3034 491-500
23. Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N, Helvie M A and Goodsitt M M 1998 Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis Med. Phys. 25 516-26
24. Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N, Helvie M A, Goodsitt M M and Adler D D 1996a Classification of masses on mammograms using a rubber-band straightening transform and feature analysis Proc. SPIE 2710 44-50
25. Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N, Wei D, Helvie M A, Adler D D and Goodsitt MM 1995 Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: an artificial neural network with morphological features Proc. World Congress on Neural Networks vol 2 (New Jersey: INNS Press) pp 876-9
26. _ 1996b Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15 598-610
27. _ 1996c Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue Med. Phys. 23 1671-84
28. Wagner R F, Chan H-P, Mossoba J, Sahiner B and Petrick N 1997 Finite-sample effects and resampling plans: application to linear classifiers in computer-aided diagnosis Proc. SPIE 3034 467-77
29. Wei D, Chan H-P, Helvie M A, Sahiner B, Petrick N, Adler D D and Goodsitt M M 1995 Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis Med. Phys. 22 1501-13
30. Weszka J S, Dyer C R and Rosenfeld A 1976 A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics 6 269-85