Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging may promote theoretical understanding of the Polygraph Test

Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 52-65

  Bell, Brian G ^a   Grubin, Don ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparison question test; Detection of deception; FMRI; Physiological arousal; Polygraph; Theory of deception

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPARISON QUESTION TEST; EMOTION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 75649133521     PISSN: 14789949     EISSN: 14789957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14789940903220676     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barland, G.H., & Raskin, D.C. (1973). Detection of deception. In W.F. Prokasy & D.C. Raskin (Eds.), Electrodermal activity in psychological research (pp. 417-477). New York: Academic Press.
2. Ben-Shakhar, G. (2002). A critical review of the control question test. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 103-126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M.I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 215-222.
4. Critchley, H.D., Elliott, R., Mathias, C.J., & Dolan, R.J. (2000). Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3033-3040.
5. Critchley, H.D., Mathias, C.J., & Dolan, R.J. (2001). Neuroanatomical basis for first and second-order representations of bodily states. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 207-212.
6. Critchley, H.D., Mathias, C.J., Josephs, O., O'Doherty, J., Zanini, S., Dewar, B., et al. (2003). Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: Converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. Brain, 126, 2139-2152.
7. Davis, R.C. (1961). Physiological responses as a means of evaluating information. In A.D. Biderman & H. Zimmer (Eds.), The manipulation of human behaviour (pp. 142-168). New York: Wiley.
8. Fiedler, K., Schmid, J., & Stahl, T. (2002). What is the current truth about polygraph lie detection? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 313-324.
9. Furedy, J.J. (1996). The North American polygraph and psychophysiology: Disinterested, uninterested, and interested perspectives. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 97-105.
10. Furedy, J.J., & Heslegrave, R.J. (1988). Validity of the lie detector: A psychophysiological perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 219-246.
11. Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S.M., Stose, S., Thompson, W.L., & Yurgelun-Todd, D.A. (2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception: An fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830-836.
12. Gamer, M., Bauermann, T., Stoeter, P., & Vossel, G. (2007). Correlations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1287-1301.
13. Gianaros, P.J., Derbyshire, S.W.G., May, J.C., Siegle, G.J., Gamalo, M.A., & Jennings, J.R. (2005). Anterior cingulate activity correlates with blood pressure during stress. Psychophysiology, 42, 627-635.
14. Happel, M.D. (2005). Neuroscience and the detection of deception. Review of Policy Research, 22, 667-685.
15. Iacono, W.G. (2000). The detection of deception. In J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, & G.G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 772-793). New York: Cambridge.
16. Johnson, S.C., Baxter, L.C., Wilder, L.S., Pipe, J.G., Heiserman, J.E., & Prigatano, G.P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain, 125, 1808-1814.
17. Kircher, J.C., Horowitz, S.W., & Raskin, D.C. (1988). Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 79-90.
18. Kleiner, M. (2002). Physiological detection of deception in psychological perspectives: A theoretical proposal. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 127-182). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J.J. (1984). A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection. Nature, 308, 449-450.
20. Kozel, F.A., Johnson, K.A., Mu, Q., Grenesko, E.L., Laken, S.J., & George, M.S. (2005). Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 605-613.
21. Kozel, F.A., Revell, L.J., Lorberbaum, J.P., Shastri, A., Elhai, J.D., Horner, M.D., et al. (2004). A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 16, 295-305.
22. Langleben, D.D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J.A., Gur, R.C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J.D., et al. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage, 15, 727-732.
23. Lee, T.M.C., Liu, H., Tan, L., Chan, C.C.H., Mahankali, S., Feng, C., et al. (2002). Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 157-164.
24. Luu, P., & Posner, M.I. (2003). Anterior cingulate cortex regulation of sympathetic activity. Brain, 126, 2119-2120.
25. Lykken, D.T. (1983). Polygraphic interrogation: The applied psychophysiologist. In A. Gale & J.A. Edwards (Eds.), Physiological correlates of human behaviour (Vol. 1, pp. 241-254). London: Academic Press.
26. Maddock, R.J. (1999). The retrosplenial cortex and emotion: New insights from functional neuroimaging of the human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 310-316.
27. Maddock, R.J., Garrett, A.S., & Buonocore, M.H. (2001). Remembering familiar people: The posterior cingulate cortex and autobiographical memory retrieval. Neuroscience, 104, 667-676.
28. Maddock, R.J., Garrett, A.S., & Buonocore, M.H. (2003). Posterior cingulate cortex activation by emotional words: fMRI evidence from a valence decision task. Human Brain Mapping, 18, 30-41.
29. Mohanty, A., Engels, A.S., Herrington, J.D., Heller, W., Ho, M.R., Banich, M.T., et al. (2007). Differential engagement of anterior cingulate cortex subdivisions for cognitive and emotional function. Psychophysiology, 44, 343-351.
30. National Research Council (2002). The polygraph and lie detection. Committee to review the scientific evidence on the polygraph. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
31. Nunez, J.M., Casey, B.J., Egner, T., Hare, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. Neuroimage, 25, 267-277.
32. Orne, M.T., Thackray, R.I., & Paskewitz, D.A. (1972). On the detection of deception: A model for the study of the physiological effects of psychological stimuli. In N.S. Greenfield & R.A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 743-785). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. Patrick, C.J., & Iacono, W.G. (1989). Psychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 347-355.
34. Raskin, D.C. (1979). Orienting and defensive reflexes in the detection of deception. In H.D. Kimmel, E.H. van Olst, & J.F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 587-605). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Raskin, D.C., & Hare, R.D. (1978). Psychopathy and detection of deception in a prison population. Psychophysiology, 15, 126-135.
36. Raskin, D.C., & Honts, C.R. (2002). The comparison question test. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 1-47). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., & Cross, T. (1985). The validity of polygraph testing. Scientific analysis and public controversy. American Psychologist, 40, 355-366.
38. Spence, S.A., Farrow, T.F.D., Herford, A.E., Wilkinson, I.D., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P.W.R. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Brain Imaging, 12, 2849-2853.
39. Vogt, B.A., Finch, D.M., & Olson, C.R. (1992). Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: The anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 435-443.
40. Yang, Y., Raine, A., Lencz, T., Bihrle, S., LaCasse, L., & Colletti, P. (2005). Prefrontal white matter in pathological liars. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 320-325.