Neuroscience and the detection of deception

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 667-685

  Happel, Mark D ^a,b  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEUROLOGY;

EID: 27244433047     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00166.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Annas, G. J. (2003). Terrorism and human rights. In J. D. Moreno (Ed.), In the wake of terror: Medicine and morality in a time of crisis (pp. 33-49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen-year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd. ed.) (pp. 3-20). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bashore, T. T., & Rapp, P. E. (1993). Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph procedures? Psychological Bulletin, 113, 2-22.
4. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). Clinical judgement and decision making in CQT-polygraphy: A comparison with other pseudoscientific applications in psychology. Integrative Physiological and Behavior Science, 26(3), 232-240.
5. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002). The guilty knowledge test (GKT) as an application of psychophysiology: Future prospects and obstacles. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 87-102). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Blank, R. H. (1999). Brain policy: How the new neuroscience will change our lives and our politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
7. Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories (2005). Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories: A new paradigm. Retrieved May 26, 2005, from http://. www.brainwavescience.com/HomePage.php.
8. Brumfiel, G. (2004). Intelligence law draws fire over NSF security project. Nature, 427, 184.
9. Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (2000). Psychophysiological science. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2d ed.) (pp. 3-23). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Campbell, J. (2001). The liar's tale: A history of falsehood. New York: Norton.
11. Clarke, A. C. (1985). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible (Rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
12. Coady, C. A. J. (1991). Politics and the problem of dirty hands. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 373-383). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. (2002). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
15. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
16. Elaad, E., Ginton, A., & Jungman, N. (1992). Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 757-767
17. Farah, M. J. (2002). Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 5(11), 1123-1129.
18. Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28(5), 531-547.
19. Ford, C. V. (1996). Lies! Lies! Lies! The psychology of deceit. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
20. Frye v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 46, 293 F. 1013 (1923, D.C. Cir.).
21. Furedy, J. J. (1996). The North American polygraph and psychophysiology: Disinterested, uninterested, and interested perspectives. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21(2-3), 97-105.
22. Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S., Sotse, S., Thompson, W., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. (2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830-836.
23. Gazzaniga, M. S., & Steven, M. S. (2004). Free will in the twenty-first century: A discussion of neuroscience and the law. In G. Garland (Ed.), Neuroscience and the law: Brain, mind, and the scales of justice (pp. 51-70). New York: Dana Press.
24. Greely, H. (2004). Prediction, litigation, privacy, and property: Some possible legal and social implications of advances in neuroscience. In G. Garland (Ed.), Neuroscience and the law: Brain, mind, and the scales of justice (pp. 114-156). New York: Dana Press.
25. Green, R. M. (2002). Ethical issues. In A. Pascual-Leone, N. J. Davey, J. Rothwell, E. M. Wassermann, & B. K. Puri (Eds.), Handbook of transcranial magnetic stimulation (pp. 50-56). London, UK: Arnold.
26. Halpern, D. F. (2002). Sex, lies, and audiotapes: The Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 106-123). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
28. Iacono, W. G. (2000). The detection of deception. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed.) (pp. 772-793). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2003). From neuroimaging to neuroethics. Nature Neuroscience, 6(3), 205.
30. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-107, §375, 108th Congress.. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http:// www.apa.org/ppo/issues/intelauthactfy04.html.
31. Kandel, E. (2000). The brain and behavior. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, & T. M. Jessell (Eds.), Principles of neural science (4th ed.) (pp. 5-18). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Foreword: Drawn to neuromagnetism. In V. Walsh & A. Pascual-Leone (Eds.), Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A neurochronometrics of mind (pp. ix-xvii). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kosslyn, S. M., & Koenig, O. (1992). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York: Free Press.
34. Kozel, M. A., Padgett, T. M., & George, M. S. (2004). A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118(4), 852-856.
35. Krapohl, D. J. (2002). The polygraph in personnel screening. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 217-236). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Langleben, D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J., Gur, R., McDonald, R., Ragland, J, O'Brien, C., & Childress, A. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage, 15, 727-732.
37. Lee, T, Liu, H.-L., Chan, C., Mahankali, S., Feng, C.-M., Hou, J., Fox, P., & Gao, J.-H. (2002). Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 157-164.
38. Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress. (1983). Scientific validity of polygraph testing: A research review and evaluation - A technical memorandum. Report No. OTA-TM-H-15. Washington, DC: Author.
39. Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (1991). A comparison of field and laboratory polygraphs in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 28(6), 632-638.
40. Raskin, D. C., & Honts, C. R. (2002). The Comparison Question Test. In M. Kleiner, (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 1-47). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41. Rosenfeld, J. P., Nasman, V. T., Whalen, R., Cantwell, B., & Mazzeri, L. (1987). Late vertex positivity as a guilty knowledge indicator: A new method of lie detection. International Journal of Neuroscience, 34(1-2), 125-129.
42. Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A. (2004). Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41(2), 205-219.
43. Saxe, L. (1991). Science and the CQT polygraph: A theoretical critique. Integrative Physiological and Behavior Science, 26(3), 223-231.
44. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 501-518.
45. Spence, S., Farrow, T., Herford, A., Wilkinson, I., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. NeuroReport, 12, 2849-2853.
46. Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., & Ganesan, V. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1755-1762.
47. Squire, L. R., & Zola, S. M. (1996). Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 93, 13515-13522.
48. Ten, C. L. (1991). Crime and punishment. In P. Singer, (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 366-372). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
49. United States Government Accounting Office. (2001). Federal agency views on the potential application of "brain fingerprinting." Report No. GAO-02-22. Washington, DC: Author.
50. United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303 (1998).
51. Vendemia, J. M. C. (2003). Neural mechanisms of deception and response congruity to general knowledge information and autobiographical information in visual two-stimulus paradigms with motor response. Report No. DoDPI99-P0010. Washington, DC: Department of Defense Polygraph Institute.
52. Wassermann, E. M. (2002). Safety and side-effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. In A. Pascual-Leone, N. J. Davey, J. Rothwell, E. M. Wassermann, & B. K. Puri (Eds.), Handbook of transcranial magnetic stimulation (pp. 39-49). London, UK: Arnold.