Signal processing strategies for cochlear implants using current steering

Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Volumn 2009, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Nogueira, Waldo ^a   Litvak, Leonid ^a   Edler, Bernd ^a   Ostermann, Jrn ^a   Büchner, Andreas ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO SIGNAL; COCHLEAR IMPLANT; CURRENT STEERING; DIFFERENT FREQUENCY; ON CURRENTS; PITCH PERCEPTION; SOUND PROCESSING; SPECTRAL CHANNELS; VALENCIA; WIDE BANDWIDTH;

AUDIO SYSTEMS; CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION; DIGITAL FILTERS; ELECTRODES; FREQUENCY BANDS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS;

EID: 75649121133     PISSN: 16876172     EISSN: 16876180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2009/531213     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wilson B. S., Finley C. C., Lawson D. T., Better speech recognition with cochlear implants Nature 1991 352 6332 236 238
2. Laneau J., When the deaf listen to music Pitch perception with cochlear implants, Ph.D. dissertation 2005 Leuven, Belgium Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculteit Toegepaste Wetenschappen
3. Wilson B. S., Schatzer R., Lopez-Poveda E. A., Sun X., Lawson D. T., Wolford R. D., Two new directions in speech processor design for cochlear implants Ear and Hearing 2005 26 4 73s 81s
4. Geurts L., Wouters J., Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001 109 2 713 726
5. Fu Q.-J., Zeng F.-G., Shannon R. V., Soli S. D., Importance of tonal envelope cues in chinese speech recognition Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998 104 1 505 510
6. Hopkins K., Moore B. C. J., The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise Journal of Acoustical Society of America 2009 125 1 442 446
7. Boston Scientific, HiRes with fidelity 120 sound processing A Report from Advanced Bionics 2006 The Audtitory Business of Boston Scientific
8. Smith Z. M., Deleguette B., Oxenham A. J., Chimeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception Nature 2002 416 87 90
9. Bchner A., Frohne-Buechner C., Gaertner L., Lesinski-Schiedat A., Battmer R.-D., Lenarz T., Evaluation of advanced bionics high resolution mode International Journal of Audiology 2006 45 7 407 416
10. Donaldson G. S., Kreft H. A., Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dualelectrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (l)(a) Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005 118 2 623
11. Wilson B. S., Schatzer R., Lopez-Poveda E. A., Possibilities for a closer mimicking of normal auditory functions with cochlear implants Cochlear Implants 2006 2nd New York, NY, USA Thieme Medical 48 56
12. Koch D. B., Downing M., Osberger M. J., Litvak L., Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users Ear and Hearing 2007 28 2, supplement 38S 41S
13. Townshend B., Cotter N., van Compernolle D., White R. L., Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1987 82 1 106 115
14. McDermott H. J., McKay C. M., Pitch Ranking with non-simultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1994 96 155 162
15. Frijns J. H. M., Kalkman R. K., Vanpoucke F. J., Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode simulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2009 129 433 439
16. Stone M. A., Moore B. C. J., Alcntara J. I., Glasberg B. R., Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999 106 6 3603 3619
17. Wilson A. J. C., The location of peaks British Journal of Applied Physics 1965 16 5 665 674
18. Smith J. O. III, Serra X., PARSHL: an analysis/synthesis program for non-harmonic sounds based on a sinusoidal representation Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC 87) August 1987 Urbana-Champaign, Ill, USA 290 297
19. Greenwood D. D., A cochlear frequency-position function for several species29 years later Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990 87 6 2592 2605
20. Stickney G. S., Loizou P. C., Mishra L. N., Assmann P. F., Shannon R. V., Opie J. M., Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions Hearing Research 2006 211 1-2 33 45
21. Purnhagen H., Meine N., Edler B., Sinusoidal coding using loudness-based selection 2 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP 02) May 2002 Orlando, Fla, USA 1817 1820
22. Nogueira W., Bchner A., Lenarz Th., Edler B., A psychoacoustic NofM-type speech coding strategy for cochlear implants EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2005 2005 18 3044 3059
23. Edler B., Purnhagen H., Ferekidis C., ASACanalysis/synthesis codec for very low bit rates Proceedings of the 100th Audio Engineering Society Convention (AES 96) May 1996 Copenhagen, Denmark. Preprint 4179
24. Mallat S. G., Zhang Z., Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1993 41 12 3397 3415
25. Purnhagen H., Meine N., HILNthe MPEG-4 parametric audio coding tools 3 Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS 00) May 2000 Geneva, Switzerland 23 31
26. Lutfi R. A., A power-law transformation predicting masking by sounds with complex spectra Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985 77 6 2128 2136
27. Baumgarte F., Ferekidis C., Fuchs H., A nonlinear psychoacoustic model applied to the ISO MPEG layer 3 coder Proceedings of the 99th Audio Engineering Society Convention (AES 95) October 1995 New York, NY, USA. Preprint 4087
28. Hochmair-Desoyer I., Schulz E., Moser L., Schmidt M., The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users American Journal of Otology 1997 18 6, supplement 83
29. Levitt H., Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971 49 2, part 2 467 477
30. International Telecommunication Union (ITUT) G. 227, International analogue carrier systems -General characteristics common to all analogue carrier-transmission systemsGeneral characteristics common to all analogue carrier-transmission systemsConventional telephone signal. ITU 1988, 1993
31. Wagener K., Kuehnel V., Kollmeier B., Entwicklung und evaluation eines satztests fuer die deutsche sprache i: design des oldenburgers satztests Zeitschrift fr Audiologie 1999 38 4 15
32. Clark G., Cochlear Implants: Fundamentals and Applications 2003 Berlin, Germany Springer, AIP Press Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing
33. Gabrielsson A., Sjogren H., Perceived sound quality of sound reproducing Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1979 65 1019 1726
34. Spetner N. B., Olsho L. W., Auditory frequency resolution in human infancy Child Development 1990 61 3 632 652
35. Propst E. J., Gordon K. A., Harrison R. V., Abel S. M., Papsin B. C., Sound frequency discrimination in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees The University of Toronto Medical Journal 2002 79 2