Self-training of dynamic touch: Striking improves judgment by wielding

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1717-1723

  Stephen, Damian G ^a   Arzamarski, Ryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TOUCH;

ADOLESCENT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; STEREOGNOSIS; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75549091425     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.8.1717     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BAHRICK, L. E., & LICKLITER, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy guides early perceptual and cognitive development. In R. Kail (Ed), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 153-187). New York: Academic Press.
2. BARAC-CKOJA, D., & TURVEY, M. T. (1991). Perceiving aperture size by striking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 330-346.
3. BLAU, J. J. C., STEPHEN, D. G., CARELLO, C., & TURVEY, M. T. (2009). Prism adaptation of underhand throwing: Rotational inertia and the primary and latent aftereffect Neuroscience Letters, 456, 54-58.
4. CARELLO, C., FITZPATRICK, P., & TURVEY, M. T. (1992). Haptic probing: Perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 580-598.
5. CHAN, T.-C., & TURVEY, M. T. (1991). Perceiving vertical distances of surfaces by means of a hand-held probe. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 347-358.
6. FITZPATRICK, P., CARELLO, C., SC TURVEY, M. T. (1994). Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the "muscular sense." Neuroscience, 60, 551-568.
7. GIBSON, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. GOTTLIEB, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792-802.
9. JACOBS, D. M., & MICHAELS, C. F. (2002). On the apparent paradox of learning and realism. Ecological Psychology, 14, 127-139.
10. JACOBS, D. M., & MICHAELS, C. F. (2007). Direct learning. Ecological Psychology,19, 321-349.
11. KARNI, A., & BERTINI, G. (1997). Learning perceptual skills: Behavioral probes into adult cortical plasticity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 530-535.
12. KINSELLA-SHAW, J. M., & TURVEY, M. T. (1992). Haptic perception of object distance in a single-strand vibratory Web. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 625-638.
13. LiCKUTER, R., BAHRICK, L. E., & MARKHAM, R. G. (2006). Intersensory redundancy educates selective attention in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Science, 9, 605-616.
14. MICHAELS, C. P., ARZAMARSKI, R., ISENHOWER, R. W., & JACOBS, D. M. (2008). Direct learning in dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 944-957.
15. MOLENAAR, P. C. M. (2008). On the implications ofthe classical ergodic theorems: Analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intraindividual variation. Developmental Psychobiology, 50, 60-69.
16. SINGER, J. D., & WILLETT, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. STOFFREGEN, T. A., & BARDY, B. G. (2001). On specification and the senses. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 195-261.
18. STREIT, M., SHOCKLEY, K., MORRIS, A. W., & RILEY, M. A. (2007). Rotational kinematics influence multimodal perception of heaviness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 363-367.
19. TODD, J. T., & NORMAN, J. F. (2003). The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 31-47.
20. VAN DE LANGENBERG, R., KINGMA, I., & BEEK, P. J. (2006). Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1093-1106.
21. VAN ORDEN, G. C., HOLDEN, J. G., & TURVEY, M. T. (2003). Selforganization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 331-351.
22. WAGMAN, J. B., SHOCKLEY, K., RILEY, M. A., & TURVEY, M. T. (2001). Attunement, calibration, and exploration in fast haptic perceptual learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 323-327.
23. WITHAGEN, R., & MICHAELS, C. F. (2004). Transfer of calibration in length perception by dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1282-1292.
24. WITHAGEN, R., & MICHAELS, C. F. (2005). The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1379-1390.
25. WITHAGEN, R., & VAN WERMESKERKEN, M. (2009). Individual differences in learning to perceive length by dynamic touch: Evidence for variation in perceptual learning capacities. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 64-75.