Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 93-101

  Gino, Francesca ^a   Shu, Lisa L ^b   Bazerman, Max H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Identifiability; Judgment; Outcome bias; Unethical behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 75449110712     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allison S.T., Mackie D.M., and Messick D.M. Outcome biases in social perception: Implications for dispositional inference, attitude change, stereotyping, and social behavior. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 28 (1996), Academic, New York 53-93
2. Baron J., and Hershey J.C. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1988) 569-579
3. Bazerman M.H., Loewenstein G., and Blount White S. Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 37 (1992) 220-240
4. Bazerman M.H., and Moore D.A. Judgment in managerial decision making. 7th ed. (2008), Wiley, New York
5. Bazerman M.H., Tenbrunsel A.E., and Wade-Benzoni K.A. Negotiation with yourself and losing: Understanding and managing competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review 23 (1998) 225-241
6. Bazerman M.H., and Watkins M.D. Predictable surprises. The disasters you should have seen coming and how to prevent them (2004), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
7. Berg-Cross L.G. Intentionality, degree of damage, and moral judgments. Child Development 46 4 (1975) 970-974
8. Bok S. Lying: Moral choice in public and private life (1979), Vintage Books
9. Creyer E.H., and Ross Jr. W.T. The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics?. Journal of Consumer Marketing 14 (1997) 421-432
10. Dana J., Weber R., and Kuang J.X. Exploiting moral wriggle room: Behavior inconsistent with a preference for fair outcomes. Economic Theory 33 (2007) 67-80
11. Eckel C.C., and Grossman P.J. The relative price of fairness: Gender differences in a punishment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 30 (1996) 143-158
12. Friedrich J., Barnes P., Chapin K., Dawson I., Garst V., and Kerr D. Psychophysical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. Journal of Consumer Psychology 8 3 (1999) 277-299
13. Gino, F., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). No harm, no foul: The outcome bias in ethical judgments. Working paper.
14. Goldberg J.H., Lerner J.S., and Tetlock P.E. Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology 29 (1999) 781-795
15. Hastie R., and Dawes R.M. Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
16. Hershey J., and Baron J. Judgment by outcome: When is it justified?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53 (1992) 89-93
17. Hsee C.K., Blount S., Loewenstein G., and Bazerman M. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options a review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999) 576-590
18. Jenni K.E., and Loewenstein G.F. Explaining the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14 (1997) 235-257
19. Jones T.M. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16 April (1991) 366-395
20. Kaplow L., and Shavell S. Fairness versus welfare (2002), Harvard University Press
21. Kogut T., and Ritov I. The "identified victim" effect: An identified group, or just a single individual?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18 (2005) 157-167
22. Kogut T., and Ritov I. The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97 (2005) 106-116
23. Leon M. Rules in children's moral judgments: Integration of intent, damage, and rationale information. Developmental Psychology 18 (1982) 833-840
24. Loewenstein G., Small D.A., and Strnad J. Statistical, identifiable, and iconic victims. In: McCaffery E.J., and Slemrod J. (Eds). Behavioral public finance (2006), Russell Sage Foundation Press, New York 32-46
25. Lowe C.A., and Medway F.J. Effects of valence, severity, and relevance on responsibility and dispositional attribution. Journal of Personality 44 (1976) 518-539
26. Marshall G.W., and Mowen J.C. An experimental investigation of the outcome bias in salesperson performance evaluations. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 8 (1993) 31-47
27. Mazzocco P.J., Alicke M.D., and Davis T.L. On the robustness of outcome bias: No constraint by prior culpability. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 26 (2004) 131-146
28. North J. Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy 62 (1987) 499-508
29. Rawls J. A theory of justice (1971), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
30. Roth A.E. Bargaining experiments. In: Kagel John., and Roth Alvin.E. (Eds). Handbook of experimental economics (1995), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
31. Small D.A., and Loewenstein G. Helping the victim or helping a victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26 1 (2003) 5-16
32. Small D.A., and Loewenstein G. The devil you know: The effect of identifiability on punitiveness. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18 5 (2005) 311-318
33. Stokes J.M., and Leary M.R. Evaluation of others' decisions by intellectually gifted and average children: Effects of decision consequences and decentering prompts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10 (1984) 564-573
34. Surber C.F. Developmental processes in social inference: Averaging of intentions and consequences in moral judgments. Developmental Psychology 13 (1977) 654-665
35. Walster E. Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3 (1966) 13-19