A single application of Cu to field soil has long-term effects on bacterial community structure, diversity, and soil processes

Pedobiologia

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 149-158

  Wakelin, Steven Alan ^a   Chu, Guixin ^a,b   Lardner, Richard ^a   Liang, Yongchao ^b,c   McLaughlin, Mike ^a,d  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b SHIHEZI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bacteria; Community structure; Copper

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; HEAVY METAL; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; NUCLEIC ACID; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SOIL BIOTA; SOIL TYPE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY;

AUSTRALIA; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

ACIDOBACTERIA; BACILLUS (BACTERIUM); BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS; SPHINGOMONAS;

EID: 75449108837     PISSN: 00314056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2009.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abaye D.A., Lawlor K., Hirsch P.R., and Brookes P.C. Changes in the microbial community of an arable soil caused by long-term metal contamination. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 56 (2005) 93-102
2. Bååth E. Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial processes and populations: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 47 (1989) 335-379
3. Bååth E., Díaz-Ravina M., Frostegård A., and Campbell C.D. Effect of metal-rich sludge amendments on the soil microbial community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 (1998) 238-245
4. Barnes S.M., Takala S.L., and Kuske C.R. Wide distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial Kingdom Acidobacterium in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 (1999) 1731-1737
5. Botton S., van Heusden M., Parsons J.R., Smidt H., and van Straalen N. Resilience of microbial systems towards disturbances. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 32 (2006) 101-112
6. Broos K., Warne M.S., Heemsbergen D.A., Stevens D., Barnes M.B., Correll R.L., and McLaughlin M.J. Soil factors controlling the toxicity of copper and zinc to microbial processes in Australian soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26 (2007) 583-590
7. Campbell C.D., Grayston S.J., and Hirst D.J. Use of rhizosphere carbon sources in sole carbon utilisation tests to discriminate soil microbial communities. J. Microbiol. Meth. 30 (1997) 33-41
8. Chander K., and Brookes P.C. Is the dehydrogenase assay invalid as a method to estimate microbial activity in copper-contaminated soils?. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23 (1991) 909-915
9. Clarke K.R. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18 (1993) 117-143
10. Clarke K.R., and Warwick R.M. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. second ed (2001), Primer-E Ltd., Plymouth, UK
11. Coleman D.C., and Whitman W.B. Linking species richness, biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil systems. Pedobiologia 49 (2005) 479-497
12. Connell J.H. Diversity and tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199 (1978) 1302-1310
13. Cooksey D.A. Molecular mechanisms of copper resistance and accumulation in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 14 (1994) 381-386
14. Costa R., Salles J.F., Berg G., and Smalla K. Cultivation-independent analysis of Pseudomonas species in soil and in the rhizosphere of field-grown Verticillium dahliae host plants. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 8 (2006) 2136-2149
15. Duineveld B.M., Rosado A.S., van Elsas J.D., and van Veen J.A. Analysis of the dynamics of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of the chrysanthemum via denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and substrate utilization patterns. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 (1998) 4950-4957
16. Ellis R.J., Neish B., Trett M.W., Best J.G., Weightman A.J., Morgan P., and Fry J.C. Comparison of microbial and meiofaunal community analysis for determining impact of heavy metal contamination. J. Microbiol. Meth. 45 (2001) 171-185
17. Fait G., Broos K., Zrna S., Lombi E., and Hamon R. Tolerance of nitrifying bacteria to copper and nickel. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 25 (2006) 2000-2005
18. Fierer N., and Jackson R.B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 626-631
19. Garbeva P., Postma J., van Veen J.A., and van Elsas J.D. Effect of above-ground plant species on soil microbial community structure and its impact on suppression of Rhizoctonia solani AG3. Environ. Microbiol. 8 (2006) 233-246
20. Garbeva P., van Veen J.A., and van Elsas J.D. Predominant Bacillus spp. in agricultural soil under different management regimes detected via PCR-DGGE. Microb. Ecol. 45 (2003) 302-316
21. Garland J.L., and Mills A.L. Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source-utilization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57 (1991) 2351-2359
22. Giller K.E., Witter E., and McGrath S.P. Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30 (1998) 1389-1414
23. Griffiths B.S., Díaz-Ravina M., Ritz K., McNicol J.W., Ebblewhite N., and Bååth E. Community DNA hybridisation and %G+C profiles of microbial communities from heavy metal polluted soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 24 (1997) 103-112
24. Griffiths B.S., Hallett P.D., Kuan H.L., Gregory A.S., Watts C.W., and Whitmore A.P. Functional resilience of soil microbial communities depends on both soil structure and microbial community composition. Biol. Fertil. Soils 44 (2008) 745-754
25. Grime J.P. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242 (1973) 344-347
26. Hitzl W., Rangger A., Sharma S., and Insam H. Separation power of the 95 substrates of the BIOLOG system determined in various soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 22 (1997) 167-174
27. Horner-Devine C.M., Carney K.M., and Bohannan B.J.M. An ecological perspective on bacterial biodiversity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. 271 (2004) 113-122
28. Hugenholtz P., Goebel B.M., and Pace N.R. Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J. Bacteriol. 180 (1998) 44765-44774
29. Janse I., Bok J., and Zwart G. A simple remedy against artifactual double bands in denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. J. Microbiol. Meth. 57 (2004) 279-281
30. Kelly J.J., Häggblom M., and Tate R.L. Change in soil microbial communities over time resulting from one-time application of zinc: a laboratory microcosm study. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31 (1999) 1455-1465
31. Kelly J.J., and Tate R.L. Use of BIOLOG for the analysis of microbial communities from zinc-contaminated soils. J. Environ. Qual. 27 (1998) 600-608
32. Knight B.P., McGrath S.P., and Chaudri A.M. Biomass carbon measurements and substrate utilization patterns of microbial populations from soils amended with cadmium, copper, or zinc. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 (1997) 39-43
33. Kunito T., Nagaoka K., Tada N., Saeki K., Senoo K., Oyaizu H., and Matsumoto S. Characterization of Cu-resistant bacterial communities in Cu-contaminated soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 43 (1997) 709-717
34. Lee S.H., Ka J.O., and Cho J.C. Members of the phylum Acidobacteria are dominant and metabolically active in rhizosphere soil. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 285 (2008) 263-269
35. Lejon D.P.H., Nowak V., Bouko S., Pascault N., Mougel C., Martins J.M.F., and Ranjard L. Fingerprinting and diversity of bacterial copA genes in response to soil types, soil organic status and copper contamination. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 61 (2007) 424-437
36. Leys N.M.E.J., Ryngaert A., Bastiaens L., Verstraete W., Top E.M., and Springael D. Occurrence and phylogenetic diversity of Sphingomonas strains in soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 (2004) 1944-1955
37. Ludwig W., Bauer S.H., Bauer M., Held I., Kirchhof G., Schulze R., Huber I., Spring S., Hartmann A., and Schleifer K.H. Detection and in situ identification of representatives of a widely distributed new bacterial phylum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 153 (1997) 181-190
38. Ma Y., Lombi E., Oliver I.W., Nolan A.L., and McLaughlin M.J. Long-term aging of copper added to soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006) 6310-6317
39. Macdonald C.A., Campbell C.D., Bacon J.R., and Singh B.K. Multiple profiling of soil microbial communities identifies potential genetic markers of metal-enriched sewage sludge. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 65 (2008) 555-564
40. Milling A., Smalla K., Maidl F.X., Schloter M., and Munch J.C. Effects of transgenic potatoes with an altered starch composition on the diversity of soil and rhizosphere bacteria and fungi. Plant Soil 266 (2004) 23-39
41. Muyzer G., de Waal E.C., and Uitterlinden A.G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 (1993) 695-700
42. Naeem S., and Li S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390 (1997) 507-509
43. Niklińska M., Chodak M., and Laskowski R. Pollution-induced community tolerance of microorganisms from forest soil organic layers polluted with Zn or Cu. Appl. Soil Ecol. 32 (2006) 265-272
44. Ogunseitan O. Microbial Diversity: Form and Function in Prokaryotes (2005), Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA
45. Oliveira A., and Pampulha M.E. Effects of long-term heavy metal contamination on soil microbial characteristics. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 102 (2006) 157-161
46. Oorts K., Bronckaers H., and Smolders E. Discrepancy of the microbial response to elevated copper between freshly spiked and long-term contaminated soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 25 (2006) 845-853
47. Orwin K.H., and Wardle D.A. New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbances. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36 (2004) 1907-1912
48. Reith F., and Rogers S.L. Assessment of bacterial communities in auriferous and non-auriferous soils using genetic and functional fingerprinting. Geomicrobiol. J. 25 (2008) 203-215
49. Roane T.M., and Kellogg S.T. Characterization of bacterial communities in heavy metal contaminated soils. Can. J. Microbiol. 42 (1996) 593-609
50. Rutgers M. Field effects of pollutants at the community level - experimental challenges and significance of community shifts for ecosystem functioning. Sci. Total Environ. 406 (2008) 469-478
51. Sandaa R.-A., Torsvik V., and Enger Ø. Influence of long-term heavy-metal contamination on microbial communities in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31 (2001) 287-295
52. Sandaa R.-A., Torsvik V., Enger Ø., Daae F.L., Castberg T., and Hahn D. Analysis of bacterial communities in heavy metal-contaminated soils at different levels of resolution. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 30 (1999) 237-251
53. Singh B.A., Munro S., Reid E., Ord B., Potts J.M., Paterson E., and Millard P. Investigating microbial community structure in soils by physiological, biochemical and molecular fingerprinting methods. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57 (2006) 72-82
54. Simpson E.H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163 (1949) 688
55. Strandberg B., Axelsen J.A., Pedersen M.B., Jensen J., and Attrill M.J. Effect of a copper gradient on plant community structure. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 25 (2006) 743-753
56. Stevens D.P., McLaughlin M.J., and Heinrich T. Determining toxicity of lead and zinc runoff in soils: salinity effects on metal partitioning and on phytotoxicity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22 (2003) 3017-3024
57. Sousa W. Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology 60 (1979) 1225-1239
58. Tilman D., and Downing J.A. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367 (1994) 363-365
59. Tobor-Kaplon M.A., Bloem J., Römkens P.F.A.M., and de Ruiter P.C. Functional stability of microbial communities in contaminated soils. Oikos 111 (2005) 119-129
60. Turpeinen R., Kairesalo T., and Häggblom M.M. Microbial community structure and activity in arsenic-, chromium- and copper-contaminated soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 47 (2004) 39-50
61. van Beelen P., Wouterse M., Posthuma L., and Rutgers M. Location-specific ecotoxicological risk assessment of metal-polluted soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2004) 2769-2779
62. Vílchez R., Pozo C., Gómez M.A., Rodelas B., and González-López L. Dominance of Sphingomonads in a copper-exposed biofilm community for groundwater treatment. Microbiol. SGM 153 (2007) 325-337
63. Wakelin S.A., Colloff M.J., Harvey P.R., Marschner P., Gregg A.L., and Rogers S.L. The effects of stubble retention and nitrogen application on soil microbial community structure and functional gene abundance under irrigated maize. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59 (2007) 661-670
64. Wakelin S.A., Macdonald L.M., Rogers S.L., Gregg A.L., Bolger T.P., and Baldock J.A. Habitat selective factors influencing the structural composition and functional capacity of microbial communities in agricultural soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40 (2008) 803-813
65. Wang Y.P., Shi J.Y., Wang H., Lin Q., Chen X.C., and Chen Y.X. The influences of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper shelter. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 67 (2007) 75-81
66. White D.C., Sutton S.D., and Ringelberg D.B. The genus Sphingomonas: physiology and ecology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7 (1996) 301-306
67. Zhang H.-B., Yang M.-X., Shi W., Zheng Y., Sha T., and Zhao Z.-W. Bacterial diversity in mine tailings compared by cultivation and cultivation-independent methods and their resistance to lead and cadmium. Microbial Ecol. 54 (2007) 705-712
68. Zobel M., and Pärtel M. What determines the relationship between plant diversity and habitat productivity?. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17 (2008) 679-684