Nickel-catalyzed [3+2+2] cycloaddition of ethyl cyclopropylideneacetate and heteroatom-substituted alkynes: Application to selective three-component reaction with 1,3-diynes

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 480-483

  Yamasaki, Ryu ^a   Terashima, Natsuki ^a   Sotome, Ikuo ^a   Komagawa, Shunsuke ^a   Saito, Shinichi ^a  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

[2 + 2] CYCLOADDITION; CHEMICAL EQUATIONS; EFFICIENT METHOD; HETEROATOMS; RELATED COMPOUNDS; THREE COMPONENT REACTIONS; THREE-COMPONENT;

ETHERS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ACETYLENE;

ALKYNE DERIVATIVE; CYCLOPROPANE DERIVATIVE; ETHYLCYCLOPROPYLIDENE ACETATE; NICKEL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; CYCLIZATION; CYCLOADDITION; ISOMERIZATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 75349095927     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo902251m     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. (a) Multicomponent Reactions; Zhu, J., Bienaymé, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Wenheim, Germany, 2005.
2. (b) D'Souza, D. M.; Muller, T. J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1095-1108 and references cited therein.
3. For reviews on Ni-catalyzed multicomponent reactions, see: (a) Ikeda, S.-i. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 511-519.
4. (b) Montogomery, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 467-473.
5. (a) Saito, S.; Masuda, M.; Komagawa, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10540-10541.
6. (b) Komagawa, S.; Saito, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2446-2449.
7. (c) Saito, S.; Takeuchi, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 595-598.
8. (d) Maeda, K.; Saito, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3173-3176.
9. (e) Saito, S.; Komagawa, S.; Azumaya, I.; Masuda, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9114-9120.
10. (f) Komagawa, S.; Yamasaki, R.; Saito, S. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2008, 66, 974-982.
11. (g) Yamasaki, R.; Sotome, I.; Komagawa, S.; Azumaya, I.; Masu, H.; Saito, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1143-1145.
12. (h) Komogawa, S.; Takeuchi, K.; Sotome, I.; Azumaya, I.; Masu, H.; Yamasaki, R.; Saito, S. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3323-3329.
13. (i) Fukusaki, Y.; Miyazaki, J.; Azumaya, I.; Katagiri, K.; Komagawa, S.; Yamasaki, R.; Saito, S. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10631-10636.
14. For a review of the reaction of ynolate and ynol ether, see: Shindo, M. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 10-36.
15. For reviews of the reaction of ynamine and ynamide, see: (a) Ficini, J. Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 1449-1486.
16. (b) Zificsak, C. A.; Mulder, J. A.; Hsung, R. P.; Rameshkumar, C.; Wei, L.-L. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7575-7606.
17. For representative examples of the reactions of ynol ether in the presence of transition metals, see: (a) Castro, J.; Sörensen, H.; Riera, A.; Morin, C.; Moyano, A.; Pericàs, M. A.; Greene, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9388-9389.
18. (b) Imbriglio, J. E.; Rainier, J. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6987-6990.
19. (c) Sanapo, G. F.; Daoust, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4196-4199.
20. (d) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rudolph, M.; Bats, J. W.; Frey, W.; Rominger, F.; Oeser, T. Chem.-Eur. J. 2008, 14, 6672-6678.
21. For typical examples of the reaction of ynamine or ynamide with transition metal, see: (a) Ficini, J.; d'Angelo, J.; Falou, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 19, 1645-1648.
22. (b) Witulski, B.; Stengel, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 489-492.
23. (c) Balsells, J.; Vázquez, J.; Moyano, A.; Pericàs, M. A.; Riera, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7291-7301.
24. (d) Domínguez, G.; Casarrubios, L.; Rodríguez-Noriega, J.; Pérez-Catells, J. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 2856-2861.
25. (e) Tanaka, K.; Takeishi, K.; Noguchi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4586-4587.
26. (f) Zhang, X.; Li, H.; You, L.; Tang, Y.; Hsung, R. P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2437-2442.
27. (g) Saito, N.; Katayama, T.; Sato, Y. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3829-3832.
28. Moyano, A.; Charbonnier, F.; Greene, A. E. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 2919-2922.
29. 1H NMR spectra according to previous results (see refs 3a, 3b, and 3e). The high E-selectivity was determined at the stage of rearrangement that prefers the s-trans conformation of the C(carbonyl)-C(α)-C(β)-C(γ) bond (see ref 3e).
30. The yield of the product decreased since the isolation of the product from the byproducts turned out to be difficult.
31. (a) Paley, M. S.; Frazier, D. O.; Abeledeyem, H.; McManus, S. P.; Zutaut, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3247-3251.
32. (b) Mal'kina, A. G.; Besten, R. d.; Kerk, A. C. H. T. M. v. d.; Brandsma, L.; Trofimov, B. A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 493, 271-273.
33. Cheng et al. reported the alkyne moiety bound to a more bulky group was more reactive. The difference probably stemmed from the sequence of cocyclization. In their proposed reaction mechanism, the 1,3-diyne was inserted into metallacycle, in our case being a component metallacycle. See: Jeevanandam, A.; Prasad, R.; Huang, K. I.-w.; Cheng, C.-H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 807-810.