Kinetics of trichloroethylene and toluene toxicity to Pseudomonas putida F1

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 56-63

  Singh, Rajveer ^a   Olson, Mira Stone ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioremediation; Chemotaxis; Pseudomonas putida F1; Toxicity; Trichloroethylene

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETICS; BACTERIA; BACTERIOLOGY; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONTAMINATION; DECAY (ORGANIC); EXPERIMENTS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; IMPURITIES; POLLUTION; RADIOACTIVITY; TOLUENE; TRICHLOROETHYLENE;

BACTERIAL VIABILITY; BEST-FIT MODEL PARAMETERS; CHEMICAL GRADIENTS; CHEMOTAXIS; CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS; DECAY CONSTANTS; DECAY MODEL; DEGRADING BACTERIA; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; HIGH CONCENTRATION; MODEL CONTAMINANT; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS; OPTIMAL CHEMICALS; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA F1; TOXIC EFFECT;

TOXICITY;

GROUND WATER; TOLUENE; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; FRESH WATER; WATER POLLUTANT;

BACTERIUM; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMOTAXIS; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; REACTION KINETICS; TOLUENE; TOXICITY TEST; TRICHLOROETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; BACTERIAL VIABILITY; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BIOACCUMULATION; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL STRESS; CHEMOTAXIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; TOXICITY TESTING; TOXICOKINETICS; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER POLLUTANT; DRUG EFFECTS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; TOXICITY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA;

BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; CHEMOTAXIS; FRESH WATER; KINETICS; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; TOLUENE; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 75349088740     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.14     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Liu C, Ball WP. 2002. Back diffusion of chlorinated solvent contaminants from a natural aquitard to a remediated aquifer under wellcontrolled field conditions: Predictions and measurements. Ground Water 40: 175-184.
2. Olson MS, Ford RM, Smith JA, Fernandez EJ. 2004. Quantification of bacterial chemotaxis in porous media using magnetic resonance imaging. Environ Sci Technol 38: 3864-3870.
3. Bosma TNP, Schnoor JL, Schraa G, Zehnder AJB. 1988. Simulation model for biotransformation of xenobiotics and chemotaxis in soil columns. J Contam Hydrol 2: 225-236.
4. Van der Meer JR, Roelofsen W, Schraa G, Zehnder AJB. 1987. Degradation of low concentrations of dichlorobenzenes and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene by Pseudomonas sp. strain P51 in nonsterile soil columns. FEMS Microbiol Lett 45: 333-341.
5. Pedit JA, Marx RB, Miller CT, Aitken MD. 2002. Quantitative analysis of experiments on bacterial chemotaxis to naphthalene. Biotechnol Bioeng 78: 626-634.
6. Abuhamed T, Bayraktar E, Mehmetoglu T, Mehmetoglu U. 2004. Kinetics model for growth of Pseudomonas putida F1 during benzene, toluene and phenol biodegradation. Process Biochem 39: 983-988.
7. Kim DJ, Choi JW, Choi NC, Mahendran B, Lee CE. 2005. Modeling of growth kinetics for Pseudomonas spp. during benzene degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69: 456-462.
8. Wackett LP, Gibson DT. 1988. Degradation of trichloroethylene by toluene dioxygenase in whole-cell studies with Pseudomonas putida F1. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 1703-1708.
9. Wackett LP, Householder SR. 1989. Toxicity of trichloroethylene to Pseudomonas putida F1 is mediated by toluene dioxygenase. Appl Environm Microbiol 55: 2723-2725.
10. Harvey RW, Garabedian SP. 1991. Use of colloid filtration theory in modeling movement of bacteria through a contaminated sandy aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 25: 178-185.
11. Singh R, Olson MS. 2008. Application of bacterial swimming and chemotaxis for enhanced bioremediation. In Shah V, ed, Emerging Environmental Technologies. Springer. New York, NY, USA, pp 149-172.
12. Pandey G, Jain RK. 2002 Bacterial chemotaxis toward environmental pollutants: Role in bioremediation. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 5789-5795.
13. Baena-Ruano S, Jimenez-Ot C, Santos-Duenas IM, Cantero-Moreno D, Barja F, Garcia-Garcia I. 2006. Rapid method for total, viable and nonviable acetic acid bacteria determination during acetification process. Process Biochem 41: 1160-1164.
14. Raymond E, Lappan HSF. 1996. Reduction of porous media permeability from in situ Leuconostoc mesenteroides growth and dextran production. Biotechnol Bioengin 50: 6-15.
15. Cunningham AB, Characklis WG, Abedeen F, Crawford D. 1991. Influence of biofilm accumulation on porous media hydrodynamics. Environ Sci Technol 25: 1305-1311.
16. Peyton BM. 1996. Improved biomass distribution using pulsed injections of electron donor and acceptor. Water Res 30: 756-758.
17. Vandevivere P, Baveye P. 1992. Effect of bacterial extracellular polymers on the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand columns. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 1690-1698.
18. Dong-Shik Kim HSF. 2000. Biomass evolution in porous media and its effectsonpermeabilityunderstarvationconditions. Biotechnol Bioengin 69: 47-56.
19. Collins LD, Daugulis AJ. 1999. Benzene/toluene/p-xylene degradation. Part I. Solvent selection and toluene degradation in a two-phase partitioning bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52: 354-359.
20. Kim H-S, Jaffe PR. 2007. Spatial distribution and physiological state of bacteria in a sand column experiment during the biodegradation of toluene. Water Res 41: 2089-2100.
21. Ray S, Peters CA. 2008. Changes in microbiological metabolism under chemical stress. Chemosphere 71: 474-483.
22. Hamed TA, Bayraktar E, Mehmetoglu T, Mehmetoglu U. 2003. Substrate interactions during the biodegradation of benzene, toluene and phenol mixtures. Process Biochem 39: 27-35.
23. Parales RE, Ditty JL, Harwood CS. 2000. Toluene-degrading bacteria are chemotactic towards the environmental pollutants benzene, toluene, and trichloroethylene. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 4098-4104.
24. ™ kit for detection of extremophilic archaea and visualization of microorganisms in environmental hypersaline samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 6884-6886.
25. Mesa MM, Macias M, Cantero D, Barja F. 2003. Use of the direct epifluorescent filter technique for the enumeration of viable and total acetic acid bacteria from vinegar fermentation. J Fluorescence 13: 261-265.
26. Decker EM. 2001. The ability of direct fluorescence-based, two-colour assays to detect different physiological states of oral streptococci. Lett Appl Microbiol 33: 188-192.
27. ™: Application of a new rapid staining method for direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water. J Microbiol Methods 37: 77-86.
28. Barton JW, Ford RM. 1995. Determination of effective transport coefficients for bacterial migration in sand columns. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 3329-3335.
29. Yu HS, Alam M. 1997. An agarose-in-plug bridge method to study chemotaxisinthe Archaeon Halobacterium salinarum. FEMSMicrobiol Lett 156: 265-269.
30. Gyurek LL, Finch GR. 1998. Modeling water treatment chemical disinfection kinetics. J Environ Eng 124: 783-793.
31. Tempest DW, Neijssel OM. 1978. Eco-physiological aspect of micriobial growth inareobic nutrient-limited environments. Adv Microb Ecol 2: 105-153.