Adaptive false discovery rate control under independence and dependence

Journal of Machine Learning Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages 2837-2871

  Blanchard, Gilles ^a   Roquain, Étienne ^b  

^a WEIERSTRASS INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED ANALYSIS AND STOCHASTICS   (Germany)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptive procedure; False discovery rate; Multiple testing; P values; Positive regression dependence

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE PROCEDURE; ADAPTIVE VERSIONS; APRIORI; EXTENSIVE SIMULATIONS; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION; MULTIPLE HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MULTIPLE TESTING; NULL HYPOTHESIS; P-VALUES; PARAMETER SETTING; POSITIVE DEPENDENCE; TESTING PROCEDURE;

DAMPING;

EID: 75249099812     PISSN: 15324435     EISSN: 15337928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Y. Benjamini and R. Heller. False discovery rates for spatial signals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(480): 1272-1281, 2007.
2. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 57(1):289-300, 1995.
3. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg. On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25:60-83, 2000.
4. Y. Benjamini and D. Yekutieli. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29(4): 1165-1188, 2001.
5. Y. Benjamini, A. M. Krieger, and D. Yekutieli. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93(3):491-507, 2006.
6. M. A. Black. A note on the adaptive control of false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66(2):297-304, 2004. (Pubitemid 38652721)
7. G. Blanchard and F. Fleuret. Occam's hammer. In N.H. Bshouty and C. Gentile, editors, Proceedings of the 20th. Conference on Learning Theory (COLT 2007), volume 4539 of Springer Lecture Notes on Computer Science, pages 112-126, 2007.
8. G. Blanchard and E. Roquain. Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 2:963-992, 2008.
9. S. Dudoit, J. Shaffer, and J. Boldrick. Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statistical Science, 18(1):71-103, 2003. (Pubitemid 41461823)
10. B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, J. Storey, and V. Tusher. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(456): 1151-1160, 2001. (Pubitemid 33695570)
11. A. Farcomeni. Some results on the control of the false discovery rate under dependence. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 34(2):275-297, 2007.
12. H. Finner and M. Roters. On the false discovery rate and expected type I errors. Biometrical Journal, 43(8):985-1005, 2001. (Pubitemid 33590295)
13. H. Finner, T. Dickhaus, and M. Roters. Dependency and false discovery rate: Asymptotics. Annals of Statistics, 35(4): 1432-1455, 2007.
14. H. Finner, T. Dickhaus, and M. Roters. On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve. Annals of Statistics, 37(2): 596-618, 2009.
15. Y. Gavrilov, Y. Benjamini, and S. K. Sarkar. An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control under independence. Annals of Statistics, 37(2):619-629, 2009.
16. C. Genovese and L. Wasserman. Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 64(3):499-517, 2002.
17. C. Genovese and L. Wasserman. A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. Annals of Statistics, 32(3): 1035-1061, 2004. (Pubitemid 41250292)
18. C. Genovese, K. Roeder, and L. Wasserman. False discovery control with p-value weighting. Biometrika, 93(3):509-524, 2006.
19. W. Hoeffding. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58:13-30, 1963.
20. S. Holm. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2):65-70, 1979.
21. J. Jin. Proportion of non-zero normal means: universal oracle equivalences and uniformly consistent estimators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 70(3):461-493, 2008.
22. J. Jin and T. Cai. Estimating the null and the proportion of nonnull effects in large-scale multiple comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(478):495-506, 2007.
23. E. L. Lehmann. Some concepts of dependence. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37:1137-1153, 1966.
24. N. Meinshausen and J. Rice. Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses. Annals of Statistics, 34(1):373-393, 2006.
25. P Neuvial. Asymptotic properties of false discovery rate controlling procedures under independence. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 2:1065-1110, 2008.
26. E. Roquain. Exceptional Motifs in Heterogeneous Sequences. Contributions to Theory andMethodology of Multiple Testing. PhD thesis, Université Paris XI, 2007.
27. E. Roquain and M. van de Wiel. Optimal weighting for false discovery rate control. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 3:678-711, 2009.
28. S. K. Sarkar. Two-stage stepup procedures controlling FDR. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138(4): 1072-1084, 2008a.
29. S. K. Sarkar. On methods controlling the false discovery rate. Sankhya, Series A, 70:135-168, 2008b.
30. C. Scott and G Blanchard. Novelty detection: unlabaled data definitely help. In D. van Dyk and M. Welling, editors, Proceedings of the 12th. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS 2009), volume 5 of JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, pages 464-471,2009.
31. E. Spjøtvoll. On the optimality of some multiple comparison procedures. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 43(2):398-411, 1972.
32. J. Storey. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 64(3):479-498, 2002.
33. J. Storey. The optimal discovery procedure: a new approach to simultaneous significance testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 69(3):347-368, 2007.
34. J. Storey and R. Tibshirani. SAM thresholding and false discovery rates for detecting differential gene expression in DNA microarrays. In The Analysis of Gene Expression Data, Statistics for Biology and Health, pages 272-290. Springer, New York, 2003.
35. J. Storey, J. Taylor, and D. Siegmund. Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66(1): 187-205, 2004.
36. W. Sun and T. Cai. Oracle and adaptive compound decision rules for false discovery rate control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(479) :901-912, 2007.
37. L. Wasserman and K. Roeder. Weighted hypothesis testing. Technical report 830, Dept. of statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, 2006. ArXiv preprint math/0604172vl. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0604172.