Service users and carers' involvement in social work education: Lessons from an English case study;Implicarea beneficiarilor de servicii sociale si a sustinatorilor lor in pregatirea profesionala a asistentilor sociali: Un studiu de caz britanic

European Journal of Social Work

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 185-199

  Anghel, Roxana ^a   Ramon, Shula ^a  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action research; Evaluation; Service user and carer involvement; Social work education

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249083684     PISSN: 13691457     EISSN: 14682664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13691450802567416     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baldwin, M. and Sadd, J., 2006. Allies with attitude! Service users, academics and social service agency staff learning how to shape power in running social work education course. Social Work Education, 25 (5), 348-359.
2. Beckett, C. and Maynard, A., 2005. Values and ethics in social work. London: Sage.
3. Beresford, P., 1994. Changing the culture: involving service users in social work education, Paper 32.2. London: CCETSW.
4. Beresford, P., 2000. Service users' knowledge and social work theory: conflict or collaboration? British Journal of Social Work, 30, 489-503.
5. Campbell, J. and Oliver, M., 1996. Disability politics: understanding our past, changing our future. New York: Macmillan.
6. Care Council for Wales (CCW), 2005. Standards for involving service users and carers in the degree in social work in Wales [online]. Available from: http://www.ccwales.org.uk/Portals/ 57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/English/Workforce%20development/STANDARDS FINAL(2)Eweb.pdf [Accessed 29 February 2008].
7. Carr, S., 2004. Has service user participation made a difference to social care services? Position paper no. 3, March, Social Care Institute of Excellence. London: The Policy Press.
8. Confederation of EU Rectors' Conference and the Association of European Universities, 2000. The Bologna Declaration on the European space for higher education: an explanation [online]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/bologna.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2008].
9. Department of Health (DOH), 2002. Requirements for social work training [online]. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/ digitalasset/dh_4060262.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2008].
10. Foucault, M., 1979. Power, truth, strategy. Sydney: Feral Publications.
11. General Social Care Council (GSCC), 2006. Working towards full participation [online]. Available from: http://www.sciesocialcareonline.org.uk/profile.asp?guid d92d2368-0691-4880-8377-d7c71c0e8e1d.
12. Gray, D.E., 2004. Doing research in the real world. London: Sage.
13. Haug, E., 2005. Critical reflections of the emerging discourse of international social work. International Social Work, 48, 126-135.
14. Heffernan, K., 2006. Does language make a difference in health and social care practice? Exploring the new language of 'service user' in the United Kingdom. International Social Work, 49 (6), 825-830.
15. Hugman, R., 2003. Professional values and ethics in social work: reconsidering postmodern-ism. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 1025-1041.
16. Humphreys, C., 2005. Service user involvement in social work education: a case example. Social Work Education, 24 (7), 797-803.
17. Jones, D.N. and Radulescu, A., 2006. Regional perspectives... from Europe. International Social Work, 49 (3), 412-418.
18. Ladkin, D., 2004. Action research. In: C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium and D. Silverman, eds. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 536-548.
19. Levin, E., 2004. Involving service users and carers in social work education, Social Care Institute of Excellence. London: The Polity Press.
20. Maglajlic, R., 2003. Co-operative inquiry in Cambridge and Sarajevo: towards a critical understanding of social work education. In: S. Ramon, ed. Users researching health and social care: an empowering agenda? Birmingham: Venture Press, 111-122.
21. Manthorpe, J., 2000. Developing carers' contributions to social work training. Social Work Education, 19 (1), 19-27.
22. Manthorpe, J., Hussein, S., and Moriarty, J., 2005. The evolution of social work education in England: a critical review of its connections and commonalities with nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 25 (5), 369-376.
23. Northern Ireland Social Care Council (NISCC), 2003. Rules for the approval of the degree in social work [online]. Available from: http://www.niscc.info/careers/pdf/Degree_SW_Rules_ 2706.pdf [Accessed 29 February 2008].
24. Payne, J., 2003. Researching oneself through reflective writing. In: S. Ramon, ed. Users researching health and social care: an empowering agenda? Birmingham: Venture Press, 27-34.
25. Ramon, S. and Sayce, L., 1993. Collective user participation in mental health: implications for social work education and training. Issues in Social Work Education, 13 (2), 53-70.
26. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H., eds., 2001. Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
27. Rees, A., 1991. Achieving power. London: Allen and Unwin.
28. Robson, C., 2002. Real world research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
29. Robson, P. and Johns, R., 2006. Strengthening partnership. Social Work Education, 25 (4), 320-325.
30. Saleeby, D., 1992. The strengths approach in social work. London: Longman.
31. Scottish Social Services Council, 2003. The framework for social work education in Scotland [online]. Available from: http://www.sssc.uk.com/preparingforpractice/pdf/siswe.pdf [Accessed 1 April 2008].
32. Shor, R. and Sykes, I., 2002. Introducing structured dialogue with people with mental illness into the training of social work students. Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 26 (1), 63-69.
33. Winter, R. and Munn-Giddings, C., 2001. A handbook for action research in health and social care. London: Routledge.