Social network analysis using author co-citation data

14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008

Volumn 5, Issue , 2008, Pages 2827-2835

  Kim, Hyunjung ^a   Barnett, George A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Author co citation analysis; Network visualization; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

COCITATION; EDITORIAL BOARD; KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES; NETWORK VISUALIZATION; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDICES;

COMMUNICATION; DATA VISUALIZATION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84870263418     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Barnett, G.A. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network, 1978-1996, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1938-1655.
2. Barnett, G.A., and Danowski, J.A. (1992). The structure of communication: A network analysis of the International Communication Association, Human Communication Research, 19, 2, 264-285.
3. Barnett, G.A., and Park, H.W. (2005). The structure of international internet hyperlinks and bilateral bandwidth, Annales des te'le'communications, 60, 9-10, 1110-1127.
4. Barnett, G.A., and Salisbury, J.G.T. (1996). Communication and globalization: A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network, Journal of World System Research, 2, 16, 1-17.
5. Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120.
6. Borgatti, S., Everett, M., and Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis User's Guide. Analytic Technologies, Inc., Harvard, MA.
7. Chang, T. and Tai, Z. (2005). Mass communication research and the invisible college revisited: The changing landscape and emerging fronts in journalism-related studies, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 3, 672-694.
8. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
9. Cronin, B. (1984). The Citation Process; The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, Taylor Graham, London.
10. Doerfel, M. and Barnett, G.A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association, Human Communication Research, 25, 4, 589-603.
11. Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in networks: I. Conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
12. Freudenthal, G. (1984). The role of shared knowledge in science: The failure of the constructivist programme in the sociology of science, Social Studies of Science, 14, 285-295.
13. Fuchs, S. (1993). A sociological theory of scientific change, Social Forces, 71, 4, June 1993, 933-953.
14. Garfield, E. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? In M.E. Stevens, V.E. Giuliano, and L.B. Heilprin (Eds.) Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation: Symposium Proceedings, Washington, DC: National Bureau of Statistics, 189-192.
15. Garfield, E. (2004). The unintended and unanticipated consequences of Robert K. Merton, Social Studies of Science, 34, 6, December, 845-853.
16. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6, May, 1360-1380.
17. Griffith, B.C. (1989). Understanding Science: Studies of Communication and Information, Communication Research, 16, 5, 600-614.
18. Hess, D.J. (1997). Science Studies: an advanced introduction, New York University Press, New York and London.
19. Kincaid, D.L. (1993). Communication network dynamics: Cohesion, centrality, and cultural evolution, in Richards, W.D. & Barnett, G.A. (eds.)., Progress in Communication Sciences, Vol. XII, 111-133.
20. Koku, E., Nazer, N., and Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 10, June, 1752-1774.
21. Krackhardt, D. (1987). QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 9, 171-186.
22. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 2, 2, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Lee, S. (2008). Understanding the Nature of Citation: An Examination of Structure in Citation Analysis and its Application to Communication in the Information Age, Doctoral Dissertation. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
24. Lievrouw, L.A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development scientific communication theory, Communication Research, 16, 5, October, 615-628.
25. Marion, L.S., Garfield, E., Hargens, L.L., Lievrouw, L.A., White, H.D., and Wilson, C.S. (2003). Social network analysis and citation network analysis: Complementary approaches to the study of scientific communication, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40, 1, 486-487.
26. McCain, K. (1986). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 3, 111-122.
27. McCain, K. (1989). Mapping authors in intellectual space: Population genetics in the 1980s, Communication Research, 16, 5, October, 667-681.
28. Merton, R.K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126.
29. Merton, R.K. (1996). Multiple discoveries in science. In P. Sztompka (Ed.) On Social Structure and Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 305-317.
30. Paisley, W. (1972). The role of invisible colleges in scientific information transfer, Educational Researcher, 1, 4, April, 5-8+19.
31. Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, Inc., New York.
32. Price, D.J. de Solla. (1961). Science since Babylon. Yale University Press, New Haven.
33. Price, D.J. de Solla. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York.
34. Rice, R.E., Borgman, C.L. and Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 2, Winter, 256-283.
35. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 4, 265-269.
36. Small, H. (1977). A Co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research, Social Studies of Science, 7, 2, Theme Issue: Citation Studies of Scientific Specialties, 139-166.
37. Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 5, 394-399.
38. Small, H. and Griffith, B.C. (1974). The structure of the scientific literature I, Science Studies, 4, 17-40.
39. Tankard, J.W. Jr, Chang, T, and Tsang, K. (1984). Citation networks as indicators of journalism research activity, Journalism Quarterly, 61, Spring, 89-96.
40. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. White, H.D. (1981). Cocited author retrieval online: An experiment with the social indicators literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 1, 16-21.
42. White, H.D. (2003). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 13, 1250-1259.
43. White, H.D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited, Applied Linguistics, 25, 1, 89-116.
44. White, H.D. and Griffith, B.C. (1980). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 3, 163-171.
45. White, H.D. and McCain, K.W. (1989). Bibliometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-186.
46. White, H.D. and McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 4, 327-355.
47. White, H.D., Wellman, B. and Nazer, N. (2003). Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 2, 111-126.
48. Yakubovich, V. (2005). Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market, American Sociological Review, 70, 3, 408-421.
49. Zuccala, A. (2004). Modeling the invisible college, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 2, 152-168.