Investigating heterogeneous protein annotations toward cross-corpora utilization

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Wang, Yue ^a   Kim, Jin Dong ^a   Sætre, Rune ^a   Pyysalo, Sampo ^a   Tsujii, Jun'ichi ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL COMMUNITY; INTEGRATED DATA; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEMS; POTENTIAL SOURCES; PROTEIN ANNOTATION; STRUCTURED TEXT;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PROTEINS;

LINGUISTICS;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROTEINS;

EID: 75149158079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-403     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kim JD, Ohta T, Tateisi Y, Tsujii J. GENIA corpus - a semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(Suppl 1):i180-i182. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1023, 12855455.
2. Tanabe L, Xie N, Thom LH, Matten W, Wilbur WJ. GENETAG: a tagged corpus for gene/protein named entity recognition. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(Suppl 1):S3-S9. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S3, 1869017, 15960837.
3. Bunescu R, Mooney R. Subsequence kernels for relation extraction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2006, 18:171-178. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Weiss Y, Schölkopf B, Platt J, 2.
4. Mandel MA. Integrated annotation of biomedical text: creating the PennBioIE corpus. Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Mining, Ontologies and Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine: 20-21 March 2006; Manchester, UK 2006,
5. Shatkay H, Feldman R. Mining the biomedical literature in the genomic era: an overview. Journal of Computational Biology 2003, 10:821-855. 10.1089/106652703322756104, 14980013.
6. Kim JD, Ohta T, Tsuruoka Y, Tateisi Y, Collier N. Introduction to the bio-entity recognition task at JNLPBA. Proceedings of the Joint workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications: 28-29 August 2004; Geneva, Switzerland 2004, 70-75.
7. Wilbur J, Smith L, Tanabe L. BioCreative 2. Gene mention task. Proceedings of the Second BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop: 23-25 April 2007; Madrid, Spain 2007, 7-16.
8. Song Y, Kim E, Lee GG, Yi BK. POSBIOTM-NER: a trainable biomedical named-entity recognition system. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:2794-2796. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti414, 15814561.
9. Kuo CJ, Chang YM, Huang HS, Lin KT, Yang BH, Lin YS, Hsu CN, Chung IF. Rich feature set, unification of bidirectional parsing and dictionary filtering for high F-score gene mention tagging. Proceedings of the Second BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop: 23-25 April 2007; Madrid, Spain 2007, 105-107.
10. Kabiljo R, Shepherd A. Protein name tagging in the immunological domain. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine: 1-3 September 2008; Turku, Finland 2008, 141-144.
11. Nédellec C, Bessières P, Bossy R, Kotoujansky A, Manine AP. Annotation guidelines for machine learning-based named entity recognition in microbiology. Proceedings of the Data and Text Mining in Integrative Biology Workshop: 18-22 September 2006; Berlin, Germany 2006, 40-54.
12. The GENIA tagger. , http://www-tsujii.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/GENIA/tagger/
13. Franzén K, Eriksson G, Olsson F, Asker L, Lidén P, Cöster J. Protein names and how to find them. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002, 67:49-61. 10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00052-7, 12460631.
14. Tsai RTH, Wu SH, Chou WC, Lin YC, He D, Hsiang J, Sung TY, Hsu WL. Various criteria in the evaluation of biomedical named entity recognition. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:92-99. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-92, 1402329, 16504116.
15. Ohta T, Tateisi Y, Kim JD, Mima H, Tsujii J. The GENIA corpus: an annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference: 24-27 March 2002, San Diego, USA 2002, 82-86.
16. Bunescu R, Ge R, Kate RJ, Marcotte EM, Mooney RJ, Ramani AK, Wong YW. Comparative experiments on learning information extractors for proteins and their interactions. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2005, 33:139-155. 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.016, 15811782.
17. GenBank: NIH Genetic Sequence Database. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/
18. Hatzivassiloglou V, Duboue PA, Rzhetsky A. Disambiguating proteins, genes, and RNA in text: a machine learning approach. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(Suppl 1):S97-S106.
19. Yeh A. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: July 31 - August 4 Saarbrücken, Germany 2000, 947-953.
20. Noreen EW. Computer-Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction 1989, Wiley-Interscience.
21. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap 1993, New York: Chapman & Hall.
22. Sang EFTK. Memory-Based shallow parsing. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2002, 2:559-594.
23. Gillick L, Cox S. Some statistical issues in the comparison of speech recognition algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing: 1989; Glasgow, Scotland 1989, 23-26.
24. Sha F, Pereira F. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology: 28-30 May 2003; Edmonton, Canada 2003, 213-220.
25. Sun X, Morency LP, Okanohara D, Tsujii J. Modeling latent-dynamic in shallow parsing: a latent conditional model with improved inference. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: 18-22 August 2008; Manchester, UK 2008, 841-848.
26. Johnson HL, Baumgartner WA, Krallinger M, Cohen KB, Hunter L. Corpus refactoring: a feasibility study. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration 2007, 2:4-14. 10.1186/1747-5333-2-4, 2072937, 17854502.
27. Pyysalo S, Airola A, Heimonen J, Björne J, Ginter F, Salakoski T. Comparative analysis of five protein-protein interaction corpora. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 3):S6-S16. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S3-S6, 2349296, 18426551.
28. Daumé H. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics: 23-30 June 2007; Prague, Czech Republic 2007, 256-263.
29. Arnold A, Nallapati R, Cohen WW. A comparative study of methods for transductive transfer learning. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops: 28-31 October 2007; Omaha, Nebraska, USA 2007, 77-82.
30. Alex B, Nissim M, Grover C. The impact of annotation on the performance of protein tagging in biomedical text. Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: 24-26 MAY 2006; Genoa, Italy 2006, 595-600.
31. Wang Y, Kim JD, Sætre R, Tsujii J. Exploring the compatibility of heterogeneous protein annotations toward corpus integration. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine: 1-3 September 2008; Turku, Finland 2008, 117-124.
32. The GENIA corpus. , http://www-tsujii.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~genia/topics/Corpus/
33. The JNLPBA corpus. , http://research.nii.ac.jp/~collier/workshops/JNLPBA04st.htm
34. Cohen KB, Fox L, Ogren PV, Hunter L. Corpus design for biomedical natural language processing. Proceedings of the ACL-ISMB Workshop on Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases: Mining Biological Semantics: 24 June 2005; Detroit, USA 2005, 38-45.
35. Cohen AM, Hersh WR. A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2005, 6:57-71. 10.1093/bib/6.1.57, 15826357.
36. Zhou G, Shen D, Zhang J, Su J, Tan S. Recognition of protein and gene names from text using an ensemble of classifiers and effective abbreviation resolution. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(Suppl 1):S7-S13. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S7, 1869021, 15960841.
37. Rinaldi F, Schneider G, Kaljurand K, Hess M, Romacker M. An environment for relation mining over richly annotated corpora: the case of GENIA. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 7(Suppl 3):S3-S11.
38. The GENETAG corpus. , ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/tanabe/GENETAG.tar.gz
39. BioCreAtIvE - Critical Assessment for Information Extraction in Biology. , http://biocreative.sourceforge.net/
40. The AIMed corpus. , ftp://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/bio-data/interactions.tar.gz
41. Databese of Interacting Proteins. , http://dip.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/
42. Yoshida K, Tsujii J. Reranking for biomedical named-entity recognition. Proceedings of the workshop of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 23-30 June 2007; Prague, Czech Republic 2007, 209-216.