The perpetuation of entrained behavior during computer-mediated communication

Social Influence

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-73

  Campbell, Jamonn ^a   Cothren, Denise ^a   Burg, Amanda ^a  

^a SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral synchrony; Computer mediated communication; Entrainment

Indexed keywords

EID: 75149142163     PISSN: 15534510     EISSN: 15534529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15534510903286129     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ancona, D., & Chong, C. L. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 251-284.
2. Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16, 814-819.
3. Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Patel, K., & Beall, A. C. (2008). Detecting digital chameleons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 66-87.
4. Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta- analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179.
5. Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 303-311.
6. Blount, S., & Janicik, G. (2002). Getting and staying in-pace: The ''in-synch'' preference and its implications for work groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 4, 235-266.
7. Campbell, J., & Stasser, G. (2006). The influence of time and task demonstrability on decision-making in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 37, 271-294.
8. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception- behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,893-910.
9. Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2006). Communication accommodation theory. In B. Whalen & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293-310). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
10. Harrison, D. A., Mohammed, S., McGrath, J. E., Florey, A. T., & Vanderstoep, S. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56, 633-669.
11. Haythornthwaite, C., & Nielsen, A. (2006). CMC: Revisiting conflicting results. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet (2nd ed., pp. 161-180). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 33, 439-465.
13. Jacobs, R., & Campbell, D. (1961). The perpetuation of an arbitrary norm tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 649-658.
14. Kalman, Y. M., Ravid, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2006). Pauses and response latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 12, 1-23.
15. Kelly, J. R. (1988). Entrainment in group interaction and task performance. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 89-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99-130.
17. Kelly, J. R., Futoran, G. C., & McGrath, J. E. (1990). Capacity and capability: Seven studies of entrainment of task performance rates. Small Group Research, 21,283-314.
18. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
19. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
20. Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 146-162.
21. Latane, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
22. McGarva, A. R., & Warner, R. M. (2003). Attraction and social coordination: Mutual entrainment of vocal activity rhythms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 335-354.
23. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, issues, evidence, and an agenda. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
24. McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford Press.
25. McGrath, J. E., Kelly, J. R., & Machatka, D. E. (1984). The social psychology of time: Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 5, pp. 21-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Co.
26. Newcomb, T. M. (1963). Stabilities underlying changes in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 376-386.
27. Nielsen, M. E., & Miller, C. E. (1997). The transmission of norms regarding group decision rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 516-525.
28. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2004). How Americans use instant messaging. Retrieved May 10, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Instantmessage_Report.pdf
29. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.
30. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
31. van Baaren, R., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15, 71-74.
32. van Baaren, R., Horgan, T., Chartrand, T. L., & Dijkmans, M. (2004). The forest, the trees, and the chameleon: Context dependency and nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 453-459.
33. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
34. Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organizational Science, 6(2), 186-203.
35. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer- mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.