Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms

International Journal of Industrial Organization

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 191-202

  Criscuolo, Chiara ^a   Haskel, Jonathan E ^b   Slaughter, Matthew J ^c  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b CEPR   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Exporting; Knowledge and technological change; Multinational firms

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; INNOVATION ACTIVITY; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; MULTI-NATIONALS; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE; MULTINATIONAL FIRMS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 75049085988     PISSN: 01677187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aitken B.J., and Harrison A.E. Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review (1999) 605-618 June
2. Amemiya T. The nonlinear two-stage least-squares estimator. Journal of Econometrics 2 (1974) 105-110
3. Basu S., Fernald J.C., Oulton N., and Srinivasan S. 'The case of the missing productivity growth, or does information technology explain why productivity accelerated in the United States but not in the United Kingdom?'. In: Gertler M., and Rogoff K. (Eds). NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2003 (2004), The MIT, Cambridge, MA
4. Bernard A.B., and Jensen J.B. Exporters, jobs, and wages in U.S. manufacturing. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics (1995) 67-119
5. Bernard A.B., and Jensen J.B. Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both?. Journal of International Economics 47 1 (1999) 1-25
6. Bernard A.B., Eaton J., Jensen J.B., and Kortum S. Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review 93 4 (2003) 1268-1290
7. Bertrand M., and Mullainathan S. Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review 91 2 (2001) 67-72
8. Blonigen B.A. Firm-specific assets and the link between exchange rates and foreign direct investment. American Economic Review 87 (1997) 447-465
9. Bloom N., and Van Reenen J.M. Patents, real options, and firm performance. Economic Journal 112 (2002) C97-C116
10. Branstetter LeeG. Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan. Journal of International Economics 53 (2001) 53-79
11. Cameron A.C., and Trivedi P.K. Econometric models based on count data. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1 (1986) 29-53
12. Cassiman B., and Veugelers R. R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review 92 4 (2002) 1169-1184
13. Cassiman B., and Veugelers R. Foreign subsidiaries as a channel of international technology diffusion: some direct firm level evidence from Belgium. European Economic Review 48 (2002) 455-476
14. Chamberlain, G., 1980. Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data. The Review of Economic Studies, Econometrics Issue, vol. 47 (1), pp. 225-238.
15. Clerides S., Lach S., and Tybout J.R. Is learning-by-exporting important: micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 3 (1998) 903-947
16. Coe D., Helpman E., and Hoffmaister A. North-South R&D spillovers. Economic Journal 107 (1997) 134-149
17. Crépon B., Duguet E., and Mairesse J. Research and development, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 2 (1998) 115-158
18. Criscuolo, C., 2004. "Explaining firms'heterogeneity in productivity and wages: ownership, innovation and size", PhD Thesis, University of London.
19. Criscuolo, Chiara and Ralf Martin. 2003. "Multinationals and U.S. Productivity Leadership: Evidence from Great Britain." CeRiBa Discussion Paper.
20. Criscuolo, C., Martin, R., 2009. Multinationals and U.S. Productivity Leadership: Evidence from Great Britain, The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91 (2), pp. 263-281, October.
21. Doms MarkE., and Jensen J.B. Comparing wages, skills, and productivity between domestically and foreign-owned manufacturing establishments in the United States. In: Baldwin R., Lipsey R., and Richardson J.D. (Eds). Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting (1998), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 235-255
22. Dunning J.H. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise (1981), George, Allen, and Unwin, London
23. Eaton J., and Kortum S. International technology diffusion: theory and measurement. International Economic Review 40 3 (1999) 537-570
24. Eaton J., and Kortum S. Trade in capital goods. European Economic Review 45 7 (2001) 1195-1235
25. Eaton J., and Kortum S. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70 5 (2002) 1741-1779
26. Greene, William H., 2004. The Behaviour of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Limited Dependent Variable Models in the Presence of Fixed Effects. Econometrics Journal, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 98-119.
27. Greene, William. forthcoming. "Fixed Effects and Bias Due to the Incidental Parameters Problem in the Tobit Model." Econometric Reviews.
28. Griffith, Rachel, Rupert Harrison, and John van Reenen. 2004. "How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of U.S. R&D Spillovers on U.K. Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing." CEPR Discussion Paper #4698.
29. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1979) 92-116
30. Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 4 (1990) 1661-1707
31. Griliches Z. R&D and Productivity (1998), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
32. Grossman G., and Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the World Economy (1991), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
33. Gupta A.K., and Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000) 473-496
34. Hall R.E., and Jones C.I. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 1 (1999) 83-116
35. Hall, B., Mairesse, J., 2006. Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15 (4-5), pp. 289-299, June.
36. Hanson, Gordon H. 2000. "Should Countries Promote Foreign Direct Investment?" G24 paper.
37. Hausman J.A., Hall B.H., and Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the R&D-patent relationship. Econometrica 52 (1984) 909-938
38. Helpman E., Melitz M.J., and Yeaple StephenR. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review 94 1 (2004) 300-316
39. Howitt P. Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences. American Economic Review 90 4 (2000) 829-846
40. Jaffe A., and Trajtenberg M. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
41. Janz N., and Peters B. Innovation and Innovation Success in the German Manufacturing Sector: Econometric Evidence at Firm Level. Paper presented at EARIE meetings, 2002 (2002)
42. Javorcik B. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review 94 3 (2004) 605-627
43. Jones, Charles I. 2004. "Growth and Ideas." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper #10767, forthcoming in Handbook of Economic Growth.
44. Keller W. Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review 92 1 (2002) 120-142
45. Keller W. International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature (2004) 752-782
46. Klette T. R&D, scope economies, and plant performance. RAND Journal of Economics 27 3 (1996) 502-522
47. Klette T., and Kortum S. Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. Journal of Political Economy 112 5 (2004) 986-1018
48. Lööf H., and Heshmati A. Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm level innovation study. International Journal of Production Economics 76 1 (2002) 61-85
49. MacGarvie M. Do firms learn from international trade?. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 1 (2006) February 2006
50. Mansfield E., and Romeo A. Technology transfer to overseas subsidiaries by U.S.-based firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 95 4 (1980) 737-750
51. Markusen J.R. Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
52. McDonald J.F., and Moffitt RobertA. The uses of tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics 62 (1980) 318-321
53. Melitz M.J. The impact of trade on aggregate industry productivity and intra-industry reallocations. Econometrica 71 6 (2003) 1695-1725
54. Mohnen, P., Mairesse, J., Dagenais, M., 2006. Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15 (4-5), pp. 391-413, June.
55. Moran T.H. Parental Supervision: The New Paradigm for Foreign Direct Investment and Development (2001), Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.
56. Newey W. Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics 36 (1987) 231-250
57. Pakes A., and Griliches Z. Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first report. Economic Letters 5 4 (1980) 377-381
58. Rivera-Batiz L., and Romer P. Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 2 (1991) 531-555
59. Romer P. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy (1990) S71-S102
60. Trefler D. The long and short of the Canada-U.S. free trade agreement. American Economic Review 94 4 (2004) 870-895
61. Tybout J.R. Manufacturing firms in developing countries: how well do they do, and why?. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (2000) 11-44
62. Tybout J. Plant- and firm-level evidence on 'new' trade theories. In: Choi E.K., and Harrigan J. (Eds). Handbook of International Trade (2003), Basil Blackwell, Oxford
63. Uzawa H. Time preference and the Penrose effect in a two-class model of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 77 (1969) 628-652
64. Veugelers R., and Cassiman B. Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy vol. 28(1) (1999), Elsevier 63-80 January