The case of the missing productivity growth, or does information technology explain why productivity accelerated in the United States but not in the United Kingdom?

NBER Macroeconomics Annual

Volumn 18, Issue , 2003, Pages 9-63

  Basu, Susanto ^a,e   Fernald, John G ^b   Oulton, Nicholas ^c   Srinivasan, Sylaja ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^d BANK OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244483441     PISSN: 08893365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1086/ma.18.3585244     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aaronson, D., and D. Sullivan. (2001). Growth in worker quality. Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (25:4):53-74.
2. Abbade, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3. Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt. (2002). Competition and innovation: An inverted U relationship. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 9269.
4. Baily, M. N., and R. Lawrence. (2001). Do we have a new e-conomy? American Economic Review 91:308-312.
5. Bakhshi, H., N. Oulton, and J. Thompson. (2003). Modelling investment when relative prices are trending: Theory and evidence for the United Kingdom. London: Bank of England. Working Paper 189. Available at www.bankofeng land.co.uk. (accessed January 8, 2004).
6. Basu, S., and J. G. Fernald. (2001). Why is productivity procyclical? Why do we care? In New Developments in Productivity Analysis, C. Hulten, E. Dean, and M. Harper (eds.). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. Basu, S., J. G. Fernald, and M. D. Shapiro. (2001). Productivity growth in the 1990s: Technology, utilization, or adjustment? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 55:117-165.
8. Basu, S., and M. Kimball. (1997). Cyclical productivity with unobserved input variation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 5915 (December).
9. Bean, C., and N. Crafts. (1996). British economic growth since 1945: Relative economics decline... and renaissance? In Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945, N. Crafts and G. Toniolo (eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10. Belsley, D., E. Kuh, and R. Welsch. (1980). Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley.
11. Berners-Lee, T., with M. Fischetti. (1999). Weaving the Web: The Past, Present and Future of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor. London: Orion Business Books.
12. Bessen, J. (2002). Technology adoption costs and productivity growth: The transition to information technology. Review of Economic Dynamics 5(2):443-469.
13. Bosworth, B. P., and J. E. Triplett. (2002). "Baumol's Disease" has been cured: IT and multifactor productivity in U.S. services industries. Manuscript, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
14. Bresnahan, T. F. (Undated). The mechanisms of information technology's contribution to economic growth. Paper prepared for presentation at the Saint-Gobain Centre for Economic Research.
15. Bresnahan, T. F., and M. Trajtenberg. (1995). General-purpose technologies: "Engines of growth"? Journal of Econometrics 65(Special Issue, January): 83-108.
16. Brookings Institution. (2002). Workshop on economic measurement service industry productivity: New estimates and new problems, May 17, 2002. Summary of the Workshop. http://www.brook.edu/es/research/projects/ productivity/workshops/20020517_summary.pdf (accessed March 16, 2003).
17. Brynjolfsson, E., and L. M. Hitt. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4):23-48.
18. Brynjolfsson, E., and L. M. Hitt. (2002). Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. MIT Working Paper 4210-01 (Web site draft revised November 2002).
19. Brynjolfsson, E., and S. Yang. (2001). Intangible assets and growth accounting: Evidence from computer investments. Manuscript. Available at http://ebusiness.mit.edu/erik/itg01-05-30.pdf (accessed December 11, 2003).
20. Burriel-Llombart, P., and J. Jones. (2004). A quality-adjusted labour input series for the UK (1975-2002). Bank of England Working Paper, forthcoming.
21. Card, D., and R. B. Freeman. (2001). What have two decades of British economic reform delivered? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 8801.
22. Caselli, F. (1999). Technological revolutions. American Economic Review 89(March): 78-102.
23. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1977). The Visible Hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Colecchia, A., and P. Schreyer. (2002). ICT investment and economic growth in the 1990s: Is the United States a unique case? A comparative study of nine OECD countries. Review of Economic Dynamics 5(2):408-442.
25. Council of Economic Advisers. (2001). Annual report of the Council of Economic Advisers. In the Economic Report of the President, January.
26. Council of Economic Advisers. (2003). Annual report of the Council of Economic Advisers. In the Economic Report of the President, February.
27. Crafts, N., and M. O'Mahony. (2001). A perspective on UK productivity performance. Fiscal Studies 22(3):271-306.
28. Daveri, F. (2002). The new economy in Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18(Autumn):345-362.
29. David, P. A., and G. Wright. (1999). General-purpose technologies and surges in productivity: Historical reflections on the future of the ICT revolution. Manuscript. Available at www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/ swp99026.pdf (accessed December 11, 2003).
30. Feldstein, M. (2001). Comments and analysis. In The Financial Times, June 28, p. 13.
31. Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger, and C. J. Krizan. (2002). The link between aggregate and micro productivity growth: Evidence from retail trade. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 9120.
32. Gordon, R. (2003). High tech innovation and productivity growth: Does supply create its own demand? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 9437.
33. Greenspan, A. (2000). Technology and the economy. Speech before the Economic Club of New York, January 13. Available at www.federalreserve.gov/board docs/speeches/2000 (accessed December 11, 2003).
34. Greenwood, J., and M. Yorokoglu. (1997). Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 46:49-95.
35. Griliches, Z. (1994). Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint. American Economic Review 84(1):1-23.
36. Grimm, B. T., B. R. Moulton, and D. B. Wasshausen. (2002). Information processing equipment and software in the national accounts. Paper prepared for the NBER/CRIW Conference on Measuring Capital in the New Economy, April 26-27, 2002, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C. Available at www.bea.gov/papers/IP-NIPA.pdf (accessed January 20, 2004).
37. Gust, C., and J. Marquez. (2000). Productivity developments abroad. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 86(10):665-681.
38. Gust, C., and J. Marquez. (2002). International comparisons of productivity growth: The role of information technology and regulatory practices. Labour Economics Special Issue on Productivity, Gilles Saint-Paul (ed.), forthcoming.
39. Hall, R. E. (2001). The stock market and capital accumulation. American Economic Review 91 (December): 1185-1202.
40. Helpman, E., ed. (1998). General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Helpman, E., and M. Trajtenberg. (1998). Diffusion of general purpose technologies. In General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, E. Helpman (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Hobijn, B., and B. Jovanovic. (2001). The information-technology revolution and the stock market: Evidence. American Economic Review 91 (December): 1203-1220.
43. Hornstein, A., and P. Krusell. (1996). Can technology improvements cause productivity slowdowns? In NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Bernanke and Rotemberg (eds.). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
44. Howitt, P. (1998). Measurement, obsolescence, and general purpose technologies. In General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, E. Helpman (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Jorgenson, D. W. (2001). Information technology and the U.S. economy. American Economic Review 91(March):1-32.
46. Jorgenson, D. W., M. S. Ho, and K. J. Stiroh. (2002). Growth of U.S. industries and investments in information technology and higher education. Manuscript. http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/ jorgenson/papers/jhscriw.pdf (accessed December 11, 2003).
47. Jorgenson, D. W., and K. J. Stiroh. (2000). Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:125-211.
48. Jovanovic, B., and P. L. Rousseau. (2003). Mergers as reallocation. Unpublished, NYU (February). Available at www.econ.nyu.edu/user/jovanovi/ wave-35.pdf (accessed December 11, 2003).
49. Krueger, D., and K. Kumar. (2003). US-Europe differences in technology adoption and growth: The role of education and other policies. Manuscript prepared for the Carnegie-Rochester Conference, April.
50. Laitner, J., and D. Stolyarov. (2001). Technological change and the stock market. Manuscript, University of Michigan.
51. Lequiller, F. (2001). The new economy and the measurement of GDP growth. INSEE Working Paper G 2001/01, Paris. Available at www.insee.fr/en/ nom_def_met/methodes/doc_travail/docs_doc_travail/g2001-16.pdf. (accessed January 8, 2004).
52. Lovegrove, N. C., S. Fidler, V. J. Harris, H. M. Mullings, W. W. Lewis, and S. D. Anthony (1998). Why is labor productivity in the United Kingdom so low? The McKinsey Quarterly, Number 4. Washington, D.C.: McKinsey Global Institute.
53. Lynch, L., and S. Nickell. (2002). Rising productivity and falling unemployment: Can the US experience be sustained and replicated?" In The Roaring Nineties, A. Krueger and R. Solow (eds.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
54. McKinsey Global Institute. (2001). US productivity growth 1995-2000: Understanding the contribution of information technology relative to other factors. San Francisco, CA: McKinsey Global Institute (October).
55. Nickell, S. (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy 104:724-746.
56. Nickell, S., and G. Quintini. (2001). The recent performance of the UK labour market. Talk given to the Economic Section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, September 4, in Glasgow, Scotland. Available from www.bankofengland.co.uk (accessed December 29, 2003).
57. Nordhaus, W. D. (2002). Productivity growth and the new economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:211-244.
58. Oliner, S. D., and D. E. Sichel. (2000). The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(Fall):3-22.
59. Oliner, S. D., and D. E. Sichel. (2002). Information technology and productivity: Where are we now and where are we going? Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 87(3):15-44.
60. O'Mahony, M., and W. de Boer. (2002). Britain's relative productivity performance: Updates to 1999. Final report to DTI/Treasury/ONS. Available at www.niesr.ac.uk (accessed January 5, 2004).
61. Oulton, N. (1995). Supply side reform and UK economic growth: What happened to the miracle? National Institute Economic Review 154(November):53-70.
62. Oulton, N. (2001a). Must the growth rate decline? Baumol's unbalanced growth revisited. Oxford Economic Papers 53:605-627.
63. Oulton, N. (2001b). ICT and productivity growth in the UK. London, England: Bank of England Working Paper 140. Available at www.bankofengland.co.uk (accessed December 29, 2003).
64. Oulton, N. (2002). ICT and productivity growth in the UK. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18(3):363-379.
65. Oulton, N., and S. Srinivasan. (2003a). Capital stocks, capital services and depreciation: An integrated framework. London, England: Bank of England Working Paper 192. Available at www.bankofengland.co.uk (accessed December 29, 2003).
66. Oulton, N., and S. Srinivasan. (2003b). The Bank of England industry dataset. Manuscript. London, England: Bank of England. Available on request from authors.
67. Parker, R., and B. Grimm. (2000). Recognition of business and government expenditures for software as investment: Methodology and quantitative impacts, 1959-98. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Available at www.bea.doc.gov (accessed December 29, 2003).
68. Schreyer, P. (2000). The contribution of information and communication technology to output growth: A study of the G7 countries. Paris: OECD. STI Working Papers 2000/2.
69. Schreyer, P. (2002). Computer price indices and international growth and productivity comparisons. Review of Income and Wealth 48(March):15-31.
70. Shapiro, M. (1986). The dynamic demand for capital and labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(3):513-542.
71. Stiroh, K. J. (2002a). Are ICT spillovers driving the new economy? Review of Income and Wealth 48(1):33-58.
72. Stiroh, K. J. (2002b). Information technology and the U.S. productivity revival: What do the industry data say? American Economic Review 92(5):1559-1576.
73. Tevlin, S., and K. Whelan. (2003). Explaining the investment boom of the 1990s. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35(1):1-22.
74. van Ark, B., J. Melka, N. Mulder, M. Timmer, and G. Ypma. (2002). ICT investment and growth accounts for the European Union, 1980-2000. Final report on ICT and growth accounting for the DG Economics and Finance of the European Commission, Brussels. Available at http://www.eco.rug.nl/GGDC/dseries/Data/ICT/euictgrowth.pdf (accessed December 29, 2003).
75. Wolff, E. N. (2002). Productivity, computerization, and skill change. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 8743.