Effect of liquid rubber additions on physical properties of Bis-GMA based dental resins

Dental Materials

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 164-168

  Mante, Francis K ^a   Wadenya, Rose O ^a   Bienstock, Daniel A ^a   Mendelsohn, Jared ^a   LaFleur, Edward E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Barcol hardness; Crosslinkage; Dental composites; Dental materials; Fracture toughness; Liquid rubber

Indexed keywords

BIS-GMA; CROSS-LINK DENSITIES; CROSS-LINKAGE; DENTAL RESINS; DIMETHYLAMINO ETHYL METHACRYLATE; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS VALUES; HARDNESS VALUES; IN-CONTROL; SWELL TEST; TOUGHENING AGENTS; VISIBLE LIGHT;

DENTAL COMPOSITES; DENTAL PROSTHESES; ELECTRIC REACTORS; ETHANOL; FRACTURE; GAS METAL ARC WELDING; HARDNESS; LIQUIDS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; RESINS; RUBBER; RUBBER ADDITIONS;

FRACTURE TOUGHNESS;

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CAMPHOROQUINONE; DIETHYLAMINOETHYL METHACRYLATE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RUBBER; TERPENE; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RUBBER; TERPENES;

EID: 75049084277     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mjor I.A. The safe and effective use of dental amalgam. Int Dent J 37 (1987) 147-151
2. Mutter J., Naumann J., Sadaghiani C., Walach H., and Drasch G. Amalgam studies: disregarding basic principles of mercury toxicity. Int J Hyg Environ Health 207 (2004) 391-397
3. Ritchie K.A., Gilmour W.H., Macdonald E.B., Burke F.J., McGowan D.A., Dale I.M., et al. Health and neuropsychological functioning of dentists exposed to mercury. Occup Environ Med. 59 (2002) 287-293
4. Stone M.E., Pederson E.D., Cohen M.E., Ragain J.C., Karaway R.S., Auxer R.A., and Saluta A.R. Residual mercury content and leaching of mercury and silver from used amalgam capsules. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 289-294
5. Mjor I.A., and Moorhead E. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Am Coll Dent 65 (1998) 27-33
6. Thordrup M., Isidor F., and Horsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 32 (2001) 199-205
7. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 17 Suppl (1) (1989) S10-S17 discussion S26-28
8. Mjor I.A. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 55 (1997) 58-63
9. Bonilla E.D., Mardirossian G., and Caputo A.A. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites. Quintessence Int 32 (2001) 206-210
10. Musanje L., and Ferracane J.L. Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on the properties of experimental hybrid resin composite. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 4065-4071
11. Xu H.H., Quinn J.B., and Giuseppetti A.A. Wear and mechanical properties of nano-silica-fused whisker composites. J Dent Res 83 (2004) 930-935
12. Mitra S.B., Wu D., and Holmes B.N. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 134 (2003) 1382-1390
13. Wendt Jr. S.L., and Leinfelder K.F. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent 5 (1992) 258-262
14. Mulhaupt R. The design of thermoset toughening agents. Chimia 44 (1990) 43-52
15. La Fleur EE. Thermoset compositions, tougheners and composites thereof. US Patent No. 0032987; 2005.
16. Kerby R.E., Tiba A., Knobloch L.A., Schricker S.R., and Tiba O. Fracture toughness of modified dental resin systems. J Oral Rehab 30 (2003) 780-784
17. Rodford R.A. Further development and evaluation of high strength denture base materials. J Dent 18 (1990) 151-157
18. Rodford R.A., and Braden M. Further observation on high impact strength denture base materials. Biomaterials 13 (1992) 726-728
19. Matsukawa S., Hayakawa T., and Nemoto K. Development of high toughness resin for dental applications. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 343-346
20. Soh M.S., and Yap A.U. Influence of curing modes on crosslink density in polymer structures. J Dent 32 (2004) 321-326
21. Asmussen E., and Peutzfeldt A. Influence of selected components on crosslink density in polymer structures. Eur J Oral Sci 109 (2001) 282-285
22. Mante M.O., Saleh N., Tanna N.K., and Mante F.K. Softening patterns of light cured glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 15 (1999) 303-309
23. Kauppi M.R., and Combe E.C. Polymerization of orthodontic adhesives using modern high-intensity visible curing lights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 316-322
24. Mills R.W., Uhl A., Blackwell G.B., and Jandt K.D. High power light emitting diode (LED) arrays versus halogen light polymerization of oral biomaterials: Barcol hardness, compressive strength and radiometric properties. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 2955-2963
25. Abate P.F., Zahra V.N., and Macchi R.L. Effect of photopolymerization variables on composite hardness. J Prosthet Dent 86 (2001) 632-635
26. Medina Tirado J.I., Nagy W.W., Dhuru V.B., and Ziebert A.J. The effect of thermocycling on the fracture toughness and hardness of core buildup materials. J Prosthet Dent 86 (2001) 474-480
27. Ratke L., and Voorhees P.W. Growth and coarsening, ostwald ripening in material processing (2002), Springer p. 117-118. ISDN 3540425632
28. Born M., and Wolf E. Principles of optics. Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. 6th ed. (1980), Pergamon Press p. 654 (reprinted 1991)