Patient personality and outcome in short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy

Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Volumn 198, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-66

  Cromer, Thomas D ^a   Hilsenroth, Mark J ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CDPS; Insight; Personality; Psychotherapy outcome; STPP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOTHERAPY; AWARENESS; CHECKLIST; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN RELATION; MENTAL DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AWARENESS; CHECKLIST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC PROCESSES; PSYCHOTHERAPY; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 74949118000     PISSN: 00223018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181c820fc     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed). Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association.
2. Andrich D (1988) Rasch Models for Measurement. Newbury Park (CA): Sage.
3. Baumann BD, Hilsenroth MJ, Ackerman SJ, Baity MR, Smith CL, Smith SR, Blagys MD, Price JL, Heindselman TL, Mount MK, Holdwick DJ Jr (2001) The capacity for dynamic process scale: An examination of reliability, validity and relation to therapeutic alliance. Psychother Res. 11:275-294.
4. Blais M, Lenderking W, Baer L, DeLorell A, Peets K, Leahy L, Burns C (1999) Development and initial validation of a brief mental health outcome measure. J Pers Assess. 73:359-373.
5. Blatt SJ (1995) The destructiveness of perfectionism: implications for the treatment of depression. Am Psychol. 50:1003-1020.
6. Blatt SJ, Quinlan DM, Pilkonis PA, Shea T (1995) Impact of perfectionism and need for approval on the brief treatment of depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 63:125-132.
7. Blatt SJ, Zuroff DC, Bondi CM, Sanislow CA III, Pilkonis P (1998) When and how perfectionism impedes the brief treatment of depression: Further analyses of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 66:423-428.
8. Blatt SJ, Zuroff DC, Quinlan DM, Pilkonis PA (1996) Interpersonal factors in brief treatment of depression: Further analyses of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 64:162-171.
9. Book H (1998) How to Practice Brief Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
10. Bryant FB, Yarnold PR (1995) Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L Grimm, PR Yarnold (Eds), Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics (pp 99-136). Washington (DC): APA.
11. Carufel DE, Piper WE (1988) Group psychotherapy or individual psychotherapy: Patient characteristics as predictive factors. Int J Group Psychother. 38:169-188.
12. Clemence AJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Ackerman SJ, Strassle CG, Handler L (2005) Facets of the therapeutic alliance and perceived progress in psychotherapy: relationship between patient and therapist perspectives. Clin Psychol Psychother. 12:443-454.
13. Conte HR, Plutchik R, Jung BB, Picard S, Karasu TB, Lotterman A (1990) Psychological mindedness as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome: A preliminary report. Compr Psychiatry. 31:426-431.
14. Derogatis LR (1993) Brief Symptom Inventory. Minneapolis (MN): NCS Pearson, Inc.
15. Finn SE, Tonsager ME (1997) Information-gathering and therapeutic models of assessment: Complementary paradigms. Psychol Assess. 9:374-385.
16. Fischer C (1994) Individualized Psychological Assessment. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
17. Fleiss J (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. (2nd ed). New York: Wiley.
18. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF (1995) Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 7:286-299.
19. Golan S, Blatt SJ, Zuroff DC, Krupnick JL, Sotsky SM (2004) Perfectionism impedes social relations and response to brief treatment for depression. J Soc Clin Psychol. 23:140-154.
20. Giyaur K, Sharf J, Hilsenroth MJ (2005) The capacity for dynamic process scale (CDPS) and patient engagement in opiate addiction treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis. 193:833-838.
21. Hatcher R, Barends A (1996) Patients view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. J Consult Clin Psychol. 64:1326-1336.
22. Hilsenroth M, Peters E, Ackerman S (2004) The development of therapeutic alliance during psychological assessment: Patient and therapist perspectives across treatment. J Pers Assess. 83:332-344.
23. Hoglend P (1993) Suitability for brief dynamic therapy: Psychodynamic variables as predictors of outcome. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 88:104-110.
24. Hoglend P (1996) Motivation for brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom. 65:209-215.
25. Hoglend P, Amlo S, Marble A, Bogwald K, Sorbye O, Sjaastad MC, Heyerdahl O (2006) Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: An experimental study of transference interpretations. Am J Psychiatry. 163:1739-1746.
26. Hoglend P, Bogwald K, Amlo S, Marble A, Ulbert R, Sjaastad MC, Sorbye O, Heyerdahl O, Johansson P (2008) Transference interpretations in dynamic psychotherapy: Do they really yield sustained effects? Am J Psychiatry. 165:763-771.
27. Hoglend P, Engelstad V, Sorbye O, Heyerdahl O, Amlo S (1994) The role of insight in exploratory psychodynamic psychotherapy. Br J of Med Psychol. 67:305-317.
28. Hoglend P, Heyerdahl O (1994) The circumscribed focus in intensive brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom. 61:163-170.
29. Hoglend P, Johansson P, Marble A, Bogwald K, Amlo S (2007) Moderators of the effects of transference interpretations in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psychother Res. 17:162-174.
30. Hoglend P, Sorbye O, Sorlie T, Fossum A, Engelstad V (1992) Selection criteria for brief dynamic psychotherapy: Reliability, factor structure and long-term predictive validity. Psychother Psychosom. 57:67-74.
31. Jacobson N, Roberts L, Berns S, McGlinchey J (1999) Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application and alternatives. J Consult Clin Psychol. 67:300-307.
32. Jacobson NS, Traux P (1991) Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 59:12-19.
33. Keithly LJ, Samples SJ, Strupp HH (1980) Patient motivation as a predictor of process and outcome in psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom. 33:87-97.
34. Knekt P, Lindfors O, Harkanen T, Valikoski M, Virtala E, Laaksonen MA, Marttunen M, Kaipainen M, Renlund C; the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group (2008a) Randomized trial on the effectiveness of long and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solution-focused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a three year follow-up. Psychol Med. 38:689-703.
35. Knekt P, Lindfors O, Laaksonen MA, Raitasalo R, Haaramo P, Jarvikoski A (2008b) Effectiveness of short-term and long-term psychotherapy on work ability and functional capacity: A randomized clinical trial on depressive and anxiety disorders. J Affect Dis. 107:95-106.
36. Luborsky L (1984) Principles of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: A Manual for Supportive/Expressive Treatment. New York: Basic Books.
37. Luborsky L, Chandler M, Auerbach AH, Cohen J, Bachrach HM (1971) Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: A review of quantitative research. Psychol Bull. 75:145-185.
38. Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P (1997) Understanding Transference: The Core Conflictual Relational Theme Method. (2nd ed). Washington (DC): APA.
39. Luborsky L, Crits-Cristoph P, Mintz J, Auerbach A (1988) Who Will Benefit From Psychotherapy? New York: Basic Books.
40. Luborsky L, Mark D, Hole A, Popp C, Goldsmith B, Cacciola J (1995) Supportive-expressive dynamic psychotherapy of depression: A time-limited version. In J Barber, P Crits-Christoph P (Eds), Dynamic Therapies for the Psychiatric Disorders (Axis I). New York: Basic.
41. McCullough L, Kuhn N, Andrews S, Wolf J, Hurley CL (2003) Treating Affect Phobia: A Manual for Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy. New York: The Guilford Press.
42. Messer SB, Warren CS (1995) Models of Brief Psychodynamic Therapy: A Comparative Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
43. Ogrodniczuk JS, Piper WE, Joyce AS, McCallum M (1999) Transference interpretations in short-term dynamic therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 187:572-579.
44. Peters EJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Eudell-Simmons EM, Blagys MD, Handler L (2006) Reliability and validity of the social cognition and object relations scale in clinical use. Psychother Res. 16:617-626.
45. Piper WE, Azim HF, Joyce AS, McCallum M (1991) Transference interpretations, therapeutic alliance and outcome in short-term individual psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 48:946-953.
46. Piper WE, Joyce AS, Azim HS, Rosie JS (1994a) Patient characteristics and success in day treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis. 182:381-386.
47. Piper WE, Joyce AS, McCallum M, Azim HS (1998) Interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables. J Consult Clin Psychol. 66:558-567.
48. Piper WE, Joyce AS, Rosie JS, Azim HS (1994b) Psychological mindedness, work, and outcome in day treatment. Int J Group Psychother. 44:291-311.
49. Piper WE, McCallum M, Joyce AS, Azim HS, Ogrodniczuk JS (1999) Follow-up findings for interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables. J Consult Clin Psychol. 67:267-273.
50. Piper WE, McCallum M, Joyce AS, Rosie JS, Ogrodniczuk JS (2001) Patient personality and time-limited group psychotherapy for complicated grief. Int J Group Psychother. 51:525-552.
51. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 86:420-428.
52. Sifneos P (1979) Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy. New York: Plenum.
53. Speer DC (1992) Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. J Consult Clin Psychol. 60:402-408.
54. Strupp HH, Binder J (1984) Psychotherapy in a New Key. New York: Basic.
55. Suh CS, Strupp HH, O'Malley SS (1986) The Vanderbilt process measures: The psychotherapy process scale (VPPS) and the negative indicators scale (VNIS). In LS Greenberg, WM Pinsof (Eds), The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook (pp 285-324). New York: Guilford Press.
56. Thackrey M, Butler SF, Strupp HH (1993) The capacity for dynamic process scale (CDPS). In ML Canfield, JE Canfield (Eds), A Collection of Psychological Scales (pp 57-63). Bartlesville (OK): Research, Evaluation, and Statistics.
57. Tingey R, Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM, Hanson N (1996) Assessing clinical significance: Proposed extensions to method. Psychother Res. 6:109-123.
58. Valbak K (2004) Suitability for psychoanalytic psychotherapy: A review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 109:164-178.
59. Vaslamatzis G, Verveniotis S (1985) Early dropouts in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom. 44:205-210.
60. Wachtel PL (1993) Therapeutic Communication: Principles and Effective Practice. New York: Guilford Press.