Relative sensitivity distribution of freshwater planktonic crustaceans to trace metals

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1335-1345

  Wong, L C ^a   Kwok, Kevin W H ^b   Leung, Kenneth M Y ^b   Wong, C K ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cladocera; Copepoda; Metals; Species sensitivity distribution; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; CLADOCERA; COPEPODA; CRUSTACEA; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; DAPHNIA PULEX; DAPHNIIDAE;

EID: 74949115467     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: 15497860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030903307115     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adema DMM. 1978. Daphnia magna as a test animal in acute and chronic toxicity tests. Hydrobiol 59:125-34
2. Amiard JC, Amiard-Triquet C, Barka S, et al. 2006. Metallothioneins in aquatic invertebrates: Their role in metal detoxification and their use as biomarkers. Aquat Toxicol 76: 160-202
3. Arner M and Kovisto S. 1993. Effects of salinity on metabolism and life history characteristics of Daphnia magna. Hydrobiol 259:69-77
4. Baird DJ and van den Brink PJ. 2006. Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67:296-301
5. Barka S. 2007. Insoluble detoxification of tracemetals in a marine copepod Tigriopus brevicornis (Müller) exposed to copper, zinc, nickel, cadmium, silver andmercury. Ecotoxicol 16:491-502
6. Baudo R. 1987. Ecotoxicological testing with Daphnia. Mem Ist Ital Idrobiol 45:461-82
7. Brix KV, DeForest DK, Burger M, et al. 2005. Assessing the relative sensitivity of aquatic organisms to divalent metals and their representation in toxicity datasets compared to natural aquatic communities. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 11:1139-56
8. Brooks JL and Dodson SI. 1965. Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28-35
9. Calow P and Forbes VE. 2003. Does ecotoxicology inform ecological risk assessment? Environ Sci Technol 37:146A-51A
10. Forbes VE and Calow P. 2002. Species sensitivity distributions revisited: A critical appraisal. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:473-92
11. Hebert PDN. 1978. The population biology of Daphnia (Crustacea, Daphnidae). Biol Rev 53:387-426
12. Knoben RAE, Beek MA, and Durand AM. 1998. Application of species sensitivity distributions as ecological risk assessment tool for water management. J Hazard Mater 61:203-7
13. Kobayashi M and Gondi H. 1985. Horizontal movement of pale and red Daphnia magna in low oxygen concentration. Physiol Zool 58:190-6
14. Koivisto S. 1995. Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in toxicity tests? Environ Pollut 90:263-7
15. Koivisto S, Ketola M, and Walls M. 1992. Comparison of five cladoceran species in short- and long-term copper exposure. Hydrobiol 248:125-36
16. Krantzberg G. 1989. Metal accumulation by chironomid larvae: The effects of age and body weight on metal body burdens. Hydrobiol 188/189:497-506
17. Kwok KWH, Leung KMY, Lui GCS, et al. 2007. Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species' acute sensitivity to chemicals: Implication for deriving safe extrapolation factor. Integr Environ Assess Manage 3:49-67
18. LeBlanc GA. 1985. Effects of copper on the competitive interactions of two species of cladocera. Environ Pollut 37:13-25
19. Leung KMY, Morritt D, Wheeler J, et al. 2001. Can salt water toxicity be predicted from freshwater data? Mar Pollut Bull 42:1007-13
20. Leung KMY, Bjrøgesæter A, Gray JS, et al. 2005. Deriving sediment quality guidelines using field-based species sensitivity distributions. Environ Sci Technol 39:5148-56
21. MacIsaac HJ, Hebert PDN, and Schwartz SS. 1985. Inter- and intraspecific variation in acute thermal tolerance of Daphnia. Physiol Zool 58:350-5
22. Mance G. 1987. Pollution Threat of Heavy Metals in Aquatic Environments. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK
23. Münzinger A and Monicelli F. 1991. A comparison of sensitivity of three Daphnia magna populations under heavy metal stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 22:24-31
24. Newman MC, Ownby DR, Mézin LCA, et al. 2000. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:508-15
25. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1984. OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. No. 202. Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation Test and Reproduction Test. Paris, France
26. Patoine A, Pinel-Alloul B, Methot G, et al. 2006. Correspondence among methods of zooplankton biomass measurement in lakes: Effect of community composition on optical plankton counter and size-fractionated seston data. J Plankton Res 28:695-705
27. Pinto-Coelho R, Pinel-Alloul B, Methot G, et al. 2005. Crustacean zooplankton in lakes and reservoirs of temperate and tropical regions: Variation with trophic status. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:348-61
28. Robinson KA, Baird DJ, and Wrona FJ. 2003. Surface metal adsorption on zooplankton carapaces: Implications for exposure and effects in consumer organisms. Environ Pollut 122:159-67
29. Roshon RD, McCann JH, Thompson DG, et al. 1999. Effects of seven forestry management herbicides on Myriophyllum sibiricum, as compared with other nontarget aquatic organisms. Can J For Res 29:1158-69
30. Ruppert EE and Barnes RD. 1994. Invertebrate Zoology, 6th ed. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
31. Śanchez-Bayo F. 2006. Comparative acute toxicity of organic pollutants and reference values for crustaceans. I. Branchiopoda, Copepoda and Ostracoda. Environ Pollut 139:385-420
32. Sarma SSS, Nandini S, and Gulati RD. 2005. Life history strategies of cladocerans: Comparisons of tropical and temperate taxa. Hydrobiol 542:315-33
33. Sendacz S, Caleffi S, and Santos-Soares J. 2006. Zooplankton biomass of reservoirs in different trophic conditions in the state of S̃ao Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Biol 66:337-50
34. Sijm DTHM, van Wezel AP, and Crommentuijn T. 2002. Environmental risk limits in the Netherlands. In: Posthuma L, Suter GWI, and Traas TP (eds), Species-Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology, pp 221-53. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA
35. Steen RJCA, Leonards PEG, Brinkman UAT, et al. 1999. Ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals in European estuaries. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1574-81
36. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1994. ARCS Assessment Guidance Document. EPA 905-B94-002. Available at http://www.epa.gov/grtlakes/arcs/EPA-905-B94-002/B94002-ch6.html
37. USEPA. 2006. Ecotox Database. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ecotox
38. van Straalen NM and van Rijn JP. 1998. Ecotoxicological risk assessment of soil fauna recovery from pesticide application. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 154:83-141
39. Versteeg DJ, Stalmans M, Dyer SD, et al. 1997. Ceriodaphnia and Daphnia: A comparison of their sensitivity to xenobiotics and utility as a test species. Chemosphere 34:869-92
40. Wagner C and Lkøke H. 1991. Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Res 25:1237-42
41. Wheeler JR, Grist EPM, Leung KMY, et al. 2002a. Species sensitivity distributions: Data and model choice. Mar Pollut Bull 45:192-202
42. Wheeler JR, Leung KMY, Morritt D, et al. 2002b. Freshwater to saltwater toxicity extrapolation using species sensitivity distributions. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2459-67
43. Wo1gram J and Liess M. 2001. Rank ordering of macroinvertebrate species sensitivity to toxic compounds by comparison with that of Daphnia magna. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 67:360-7
44. Yan ND, Girard R, Heneberry JH, et al. 2004. Recovery of copepod, but not cladoceran, zooplankton from severe and chronic effects of multiple stressors. Ecol Lett 7:452-60
45. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA