Application of species sensitivity distributions as ecological risk assessment tool for water management

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 61, Issue 1-3, 1998, Pages 203-207

  Knoben, R A E ^a   Beek, M A ^b   Durand, A M ^a  

^a WITTEVEEN BOS   (Netherlands)

^b INST INLAND WATER MGMT WASTE W   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecological risk; Species sensitivity distribution; Water management

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ECOLOGY; EXTRAPOLATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TOXICITY; WATER QUALITY;

WATER POLLUTION;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

CONFERENCE PAPER; ECOTOXICOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; POLLUTION; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TISSUE; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER STANDARD;

EID: 0032142943     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00124-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. CUWVO, Aanbevelingen voor het monitoren van stoffen van de M-lijst uit de derde Nota waterhuishouding, Coördinatiecommissie uitvoering wet verontreiniging oppervlaktewater, werkgroep V, 1990, p. 90.
2. Y.A. Eys, E.H.G. Evers, G.A.J. Mol, S. Stolwijk, P.D.M. Stortelder, A. Wilting, Beleidsanalyse WSV: kwaliteit van water en waterbodem, De toekomstige kwaliteit van de Nederlandse watersystemen verkend, RIZA notanr: 96.076, rapport-RIKZ 96.041, 1996, 65 pp.
3. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Water Res. 21:1987;269-276.
4. van Straalen N.M., Denneman C.A.J. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 18:1989;241-251.
5. Aldenberg T., Slob W. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 25:1993;48-63.