Ceriodaphnia and daphnia: A comparison of their sensitivity to xenobiotics and utility as a test species

Chemosphere

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 869-892

  Versteeg, D J ^a   Stalmans, M ^a   Dyer, S D ^a   Janssen, C ^b  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Acute; Ceriodaphnia; Chronic; Daphnia; Invertebrate; Toxicity test

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; DAPHNIA; ECOTOXICITY; INVERTEBRATE; NONHUMAN; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY TESTING; WATER POLLUTION;

CERIODAPHNIA; CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; CERIODAPHNIA SP.; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; INVERTEBRATA; PULEX;

EID: 0031080036     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00014-3     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. G. T. Ankley, G. S. Peterson, M. T. Lukasewycz and D. A. Jensen, Characteristics of surfactants in toxicity identification evaluation, Chemosphere 21: 3-12 (1990).
2. G. T. Ankley, J. R. Dierkes, D. A. Jensen and G. S. Peterson, Piperonyl butoxide as a tool in aquatic toxicological research with organophosphate insecticides, Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 21: 266-274 (1991).
3. ASTM, Standard guide (proposed) for conducting Daphnia magna life cycle toxicity tests, E1193, Draft No. 9, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 66 (1996).
4. S. E. Belanger, Acute and chronic toxicity relationships for five Cladocerans, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Abstracts from 10th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Abstract P220, p. 244 (1989).
5. S. E. Belanger, Use of experimental stream mesocosms to assess ecosystem risk: A case study with a cationic surfactant. In Predicting Ecosystem Risk, Advances in Modern Environmental Toxicology (Edited by J. Cairns, Jr., B. R. Nederleihner and D. R. Orvos), Vol. 20, pp 263-287. Princeton Scientific Publishing Co., Princeton, N.J. (1992).
6. S. E. Belanger, K. L. Rupe and R. G. Bausch, Responses of invertebrates and fish to alkyl sulfate and alkyl ethoxylate sulfate anionic surfactants during chronic exposure, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 55: 751-758 (1995).
7. D. B. Berner, Significance of head and carapace pores in Ceriodaphnia (Crustacea, Cladocera), Hydrobiologia 145: 75-84 (1987a).
8. D. B. Berner, Taxonomy of Ceriodaphnia (Crustacea; Cladocera). In U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cultures, EPA/600/S4-86/032, p. 2, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati. (1987b).
9. K. D. Biesinger and G. M. Christensen, Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism of Daphnia magna, J. Fish Res. Bd. Can. 29: 1691-1700 (1972).
10. J. H. Canton and D. M. M. Adema, Reproducibility of short-term and reproduction toxicity experiments with Daphnia magna and comparison of the sensitivity of Daphnia magna with Daphnia pulex and Daphnia cucullata in short-term experiments, Hydrobiologia 59: 135-140 (1978).
11. P. Carchon, Studie van de populatiedynamica en voortplantingsbiologie van de Cladoceren (Crustacea) in zes parkvijvers in en rond Gent, MSc thesis, p. 190, University of Ghent, Belgium. (1994).
12. C. E. Cowan, D. J. Versteeg, R. J. Larson and P. J. Kloepper-Sams, Integrated approach for environmental assessment of new and existing substances, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 21: 3-31 (1995).
13. U. M. Cowgill and D. P. Milazzo, The sensitivity of Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia magna to seven chemicals utilizing the three-brood test, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 20: 211-217 (1991).
14. U. M. Cowgill, D. P. Milazzo and B. D. Landenberger, The reproducibility of the three brood Ceriodaphnia test using the reference toxicant sodium lauryl sulfate, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 19: 513-517 (1990).
15. U. M. Cowgill, I. T. Takahashi and S. L. Applegath, A comparison of the effect of four benchmark chemicals on Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia-affinis tested at two different temperatures, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 4: 415-422 (1985).
16. G. M. DeGraeve, J. D. Cooney, B. H. Marsh, T. L. Pollock and N. G. Reichenbach, Variability in the performance of the 7-d Ceriodaphnia dubia survival and reproduction test: An intra-and interlaboratory study, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11: 851-866 (1992).
17. EC (European Community), Directive on Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances, 67/548/EEC (1967).
18. EC (European Community), Directive 79/831/EEC Part C.2: Methods for the Determination of Ecotoxicity (1987).
19. EC (European Community), Directive on Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances, 91/325/EEC (1991).
20. EC, Method for the determination of ecotoxicity, part C.2: Acute toxicity for Daphnia (Directive 92/69/EEC (Annex ;V 1992 adaptation to 67/548/EEC)), Off. J. Eur. Comm. No L 383: 172-178 (1992).
21. M. T. Elnabarawy, A. N. Welter and R. R. Robideau, Relative sensitivity of three daphnid species to selected organic and inorganic chemicals, Environ. Toxicol Chem. 5: 393-398 (1986).
22. C. Eirkson, M. C. Harrass, C. M. Osborne, P. G. Sayre and M. Zeeman, Environmental Assessment Technical Handbook, Food and Drug Administration, FDA/CFSAN-87/30 (1987).
23. B. Ernst, G. Julien, K. Doe and R. Parker, Environmental investigations of the 1980 spruce budworm spray program in New Brunswick, EPS-5-AR-81-3, Surveillance Report, Canada Environmental Protection Service (1980).
24. J. Flößner, Krebstiere, Crustacea, Kiemen-und Blattfüßer, Branchiopoda, Fishläuse, Branchiura, Fischer Verlag, Jena. pp. 501 (1972).
25. N. J. Grandy, Role of the OECD in chemicals control and international harmonization of testing methods. In Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology (Edited by G. M. Rand), pp. 763-774, Taylor & Francis Publ., Washington, D.C., (1995).
26. C. W. Hickey, Sensitivity of four New Zealand cladoceran species and Daphnia magna to aquatic toxicants, New Zealand J. Mar. Fresh. Res. 23: 131-137 (1989).
27. ISO, Water quality - Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea) - Acute toxicity test. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 63411996(E). pp.12 (1996).
28. R. A. Kimerle, A. F. Werner and W. J. Adams, Aquatic hazard evaluation principles applied to the development of water quality criteria. In Aquatic Toxicoloy and Hazard Assessment: Seventh Symposium (Edited by R. D. Cardwell, R. Purdy, and R. C. Bahner), pp. 538-547, ASTM STP 854, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1985).
29. R. A. Kimerle and R. Swisher, Reduction of aquatic toxicity of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) by biodegradation, Water Res. 2: 31-37 (1977).
30. S. M. Koivisto, M. Ketola and M. Walls, Comparison of five Cladoceran species in short-and long-term copper exposure, Hydrobiologia 248: 125-136 (1992).
31. S. Koivisto, Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in toxicity tests? Environ. Pollut. 90: 263-267 (1995).
32. G. A. LeBlanc, Laboratory investigation into the development of resistance of Daphnia magna (Straus) to environmental pollution, Environ. Pollut. (Series A) 27: 309-322 (1982).
33. P. A. Lewis and C. I. Weber, A study of the reliability of Daphnia acute toxicity tests. In Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Seventh Symposium, ASTM STP 854 (Edited by R. D. Cardwell, R. Purdy, R. C. Banner), pp. 73-86, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1985).
34. H. Lilius, T. Hastbacka and B. Isomaa, A comparison of the toxicity of 30 reference chemicals to Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14: 2085-2088 (1995).
35. P. Lundahl, R. Cabridenc and R. Xuereff, Qualites biologiques de quelques agents de surface anioniques, pp.689-699, Sixth International Congress on Surface Active Agents (1972).
36. M. Luyten, Over de ecologie der Cladocera van België. Biologisch Jaarboek Dodonaea, De Sikkel, Antwerpen, Belgium. pp. 179 (1934).
37. A. W. Maki, Correlations between Daphnia magna and fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) chronic toxicity values for several classes of test substances, J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 411-421 (1979).
38. A. W. Maki and W. E. Bishop, Acute toxicity studies of surfactants to Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 8: 599-612 (1979).
39. S. Marchini, M. D. Hoglund, S. J. Broderius and M. L. Tosato, Comparison of the susceptibility of daphnids and fish to benzene derivatives, Sci. Total Environ., Suppl. 799-808 (1993).
40. J. A. Masters, M. A. Lewis, D. H. Davidson and R. D. Bruce, Validation of a four-day Ceriodaphnia toxicity test and statistical considerations in data analysis, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10: 47-55 (1991).
41. L. E. Mokry and K. D. Hoagland, Acute toxicities of five synthetic pyrethroid insecticides to Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9: 1045-1051 (1990).
42. S. B. Moore, R. A. Diehl, J. M. Barnhardt and G. B. Aver, Aquatic toxicities of textile surfactants, Text. Chem. Color 19: 29-32 (1987).
43. D. I. Mount and T. J. Norberg, A seven-day life-cycle Cladoceran toxicity test, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 3: 425-434 (1984).
44. E. Notenboom-Ram, Verspreiding en ecologie van de Branchiopoda in Nederland, RIN-rapport 81/14, Rijksinstituut voor Natuurbeheer, Leersum, Nederland. p. 95 (1981).
45. OECD, Daphnia sp. acute immobilization test and reproduction test, Method 202, OECD Guidelines for Testing Chemicals (1993).
46. J. T. Oris, R. W. Winner and M. V. Moore, A four-day survival and reproduction toxicity test for Ceriodaphnia dubia, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10: 217-224 (1991).
47. B. R. Parkhurst, W. Warren-Hicks and L. E. Noel, Performance characteristics of effluent toxicity tests: Summarization and evaluation of data, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11: 771-791 (1992).
48. R. W. Pennak, Freshwater Invertebrates in the United States, Roland Press, p. 769 New York.(1953).
49. G. Persoone and C. R. Janssen, Freshwater invertebrate toxicity tests. In Handbook of Ecotoxicology, (Edited by P. Calow), Blackwell Scientific Publisher, p. 55, Ambleside, UK (1993).
50. C. A. Pittinger, D. J. Versteeg, B. A. Blatz and E. M. Meiers, Environmental toxicology of succinate tartrates, Aquatic Toxicol. 24: 83-102 (1992).
51. C. A. Pittinger and R. Kimerle, Aquatic hazard assessment of linear dodecylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in U.S. surface waters, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Abstracts from 11th Annual Meeting, Abstract 55, p. 112 Alexandria, VA. (1990).
52. G. D. Schroder, S. Ross-Lewandowski and E. M. Davis, Evaluation of the toxic effects of selected municipal wastewater effluents on aquatic invertebrates, Environ. Technol. 12: 757-768 (1991).
53. D. J. Scourfield and J. P. Harding, Freshwater Cladocera, Freshwater Biological Association, p. 55, Ambleside, UK. (1958).
54. R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf, Biometry, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, (1981).
55. G. W. Suter, Ecological Risk Assessment, Lewis Publishers, pp. 196-215, Chelsea, Michigan (1993).
56. I. T. Takahashi, U. M. Cowgill and T. G. Murphy, Comparison of ethanol toxicity to Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia tested at two different temperatures: Static acute toxicity test results, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 39: 229-236 (1987).
57. S. Talmadge, Environmental and Human Safety of Major Surfactants: Alcohol Ethoxylates and Aklylphenol Ethoxylates, Lewis Publishers, pp. 271, Chelsea, Michigan (1993).
58. M. J. Taylor, Effect of diet on the sensitivity of Daphnia magna to linear alkyl benzene sulfonate. In Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Seventh Symposium, ASTM STP 854 (Edited by R. D. Cardwell, R. Purdy, R.C. Bahner), American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 53-72, Philadelphia (1985).
59. U.S. EPA, Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, EPA/600/4-89/001, p. 249 (1989).
60. U.S. EPA, Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, Fourth Edition, EPA/600/4-90/02TF, p. 293 (1993).
61. R. W. Winner, Evaluation of the relative sensitivities of 7-d Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia toxicity tests for cadmium and sodium pentachlorophenate, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 7: 153-160 (1988).