Project performance development framework: An approach for developing performance criteria & measures for information systems (IS) projects

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 272-292

  Barclay, Corlane ^a   Osei Bryson, Kweku Muata ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Jamaica)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design science; IS projects; Measures; Performance criteria; Project objectives; Project performance framework (PPDF) model; Success criteria

Indexed keywords

DESIGN SCIENCE; PERFORMANCE CRITERIA; PERFORMANCE CRITERION; PROJECT OBJECTIVES; PROJECT PERFORMANCE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

FORMAL METHODS;

EID: 74849112033     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.025     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Agarwal N., and Rathod U. Defining 'success' for software projects: an exploratory revelation. International Journal of Project Management 24 4 (2006) 358-370
2. Ala-Risku T., and Kärkkäinen M. Material delivery problems in construction projects: a possible solution. International Journal of Production Economics 104 1 (2006) 19-29
3. Alleman G.B. Agile project management for it projects. In: Elias Y.-H.K., Carayannis G., and Anbari F.T. (Eds). The Story of Managing Projects: An Interdisciplinary Approach (2005), Greenwood Press 373
4. APM. The APM Body of Knowledge. fifth ed (2006), The Association of Project Management
5. Arshinder K.A., and Deshmukh S.G. Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics 115 2 (2008) 316-335
6. Atkinson R. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management 17 6 (1999) 337-342
7. Atkinson R., Crawford L., and Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management 24 (2006) 687-698
8. Azzone G., Masella C., and Bertele U. Design of performance measures for time-based companies. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 11 3 (1991) 77-85
9. Baccarini D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal 30 4 (1999) 25-32
10. Barclay C. Towards an integrated measurement of is project performance: the project performance scorecard. Information Systems Frontiers 10 (2008) 331-345
11. Basili V.R. Foreword. The Goal/Question/Metric Method, A Practical Method for Quality Improvement of Software Development (1999), McGraw-Hill, London
12. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D., 1994. The goal question metric approach. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering.
13. Basili V.R., and Weiss D.M. A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10 6 (1984) 728-738
14. Belassi W., and Tukel O.I. A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects. International Journal of Project Management 14 3 (1996) 141-151
15. Bhushan N., and Rai K. Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (2004), Springer, London
16. Bourne L., and Walker D.H.T. Using a visualising tool to study stakeholder influence-two Australian examples. Project Management Journal 37 1 (2006) 5-21
17. Bryde D.J., and Robinson L. Client versus contractor perspectives on project success criteria. International Journal of Project Management 23 8 (2005) 622-629
18. Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM 36 12 (1993) 67-77
19. Bryson, N., 1997. Supporting consensus formation in group support systems using the qualitative discriminant process. Annals of Operations Research: Interface between Information Systems and Operations Research 71, 75-91.
20. Cannon-Bowers J.A., Salas E., and Converse S. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan J.N.J. (Ed). Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 221-246
21. Chen S.C., and Dhillon G.S. Interpreting dimensions of consumer trust in e-commerce. Journal of Information Technology and Management 4 2-3 (2003)
22. ® integration (cmmism). Version 1.1, cmu/sei-2002-tr-011.
23. Cohen D.J., and Graham R.J. The Project Manager's MBA: How to Translate Project Decisions into Business Success (2001), Wiley, New York
24. Collins A., and Baccarini D. Project success-a survey. Journal of Construction Research 5 2 (2004) 211-231
25. Cooke-Davies T. The "real" success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management 20 3 (2002) 185-190
26. Creswell J.W., and Miller D. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice 39 3 (2000) 124-130
27. Darke P., Shanks G., and Broadbent M. Successfully completing case study research: combining rigor, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal 8 (1998) 273-289
28. Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
29. Dhillon G., and Torkzadeh G. Value-focused assessment of information system security in organizations. Information Systems Journal 16 (2006) 293-314
30. Dixon J.R., Nanni A.J., and Vollmann T.E. New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-class Competition (Irwin/apics Series in Production Management) (1990), McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, Homewood, IL
31. Drevin L., Kruger H.A., and Steyn T. Value-focused assessment of ict security awareness in an academic environment. Computers and Security 26 1 (2007) 36-43
32. Dubé L., and Paré G. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly 27 4 (2003) 597-634
33. Engwall M. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Research Policy 32 (2003) 789-808
34. Esteves, J.M., Pastor, J., Casanovas, J., 2003. A goal/question/metric research proposal to monitor user involvement and participation in ERP implementation projects. Paper presented at the Information Resources Management Association Conference (IRMA), Philadelphia, USA.
35. Ewusi-Mensah K. Critical issues in abandoned information systems development projects. Communications of the ACM 40 9 (1997) 71-80
36. Fitzgerald G. Evaluating information systems project: a multidimensional approach. Journal of Information Technology 13 1 (1998) 15-27
37. Fleissig, W., Jacobsen, V., 2002. Smart scorecard for development projects: in collaboration with the congress for new urbanism and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
38. Folan P., and Browne J. A review of performance measurement: towards performance management. Computers in Industry 56 (2005) 663-680
39. Fortune J., and White D. Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. International Journal of Project Management 24 1 (2006) 53-65
40. Freeman M., and Beale P. Measuring project success. Project Management Journal 23 1 (1992) 8-17
41. Glass, R.L., 2005. It failure rates-70% or 10-15%. IEEE Software, May-June.
42. Gibbert M., Guigrok W., and Wicki B. What passes as a rigorous case study. Strategic Management Journal 29 (2008) 1465-1475
43. Globerson S. Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organisation. International Journal of Production Research 23 4 (1985) 639-646
44. Hartman F., and Ashrafi R.A. Project management in the information systems and information technologies industries. Project Management Journal 33 3 (2002) 5-15
45. Hevner A.R., March S.T., Park J., and Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28 1 (2004) 75-105
46. Huber G. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science 2 1 (1991) 88-115
47. ISO/IEC. (2000). Quality Management Systems-Requirements: International Organization for Standardization.
48. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 1 (1992) 71-79
49. Katzenbach J.R., and Smith D.K. The Wisdom of Teams: creating the High-performance Organization (2003), Collins
50. Keeney R.L. Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (1992), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
51. Keeney R.L. Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research 92 (1996) 537-549
52. KPMG, 2005. Global it project management survey: KPMG Information Risk Management.
53. Kumar R.L. Understanding the value of information technology enabled responsiveness. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, EJISE 1 1 (2003)
54. Leonard-Barton, D., 1990. A dual methodology for case studies. Synergistic use of longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science 1 (1), 248-266.
55. Lim C.S., and Mohamed M.Z. Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management 17 4 (1999) 243-248
56. Lyytinen K., and Hirschheim R. Information systems failures-a survey and classification of the empirical literature. In: Zorkoczy P. (Ed). Oxford Surveys in Information Technology (1988), Oxford University Press, New York, NY 257-309
57. March S.T., and Smith G.F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15 (1995) 251-266
58. Martinsons M., Davison R., and Tse D. The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems 25 (1999) 71-88
59. Maylor H., Brady T., Cooke-Davies T., and Hodgson D. From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management 24 (2006) 663-674
60. Melville N., Kraemer K., and Gurbaxani V. Review: information technology and organisational performance: an integrative model of it business value. MIS Quarterly 28 2 (2004) 283-322
61. Milis K., and Mercken R. Success factors regarding the implementation of ict investment projects. International Journal of Production Economics 80 1 (2002) 105-117
62. Morris P. Current Trends in Project and Programme Management (2004), Association for Project Management (APM), High Wycombe
63. Morris, P.W.G., Hough, G.H., 1987. The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. John Wiley & Sons.
64. Nelson R.R. Project retrospectives: evaluating project success, failure and everything in between. MIS Quarterly Executive 4 3 (2005) 361-372
65. Niebecker K., Eager D., and Kubitza K. Improving cross-company project management performance with a collaborative project scorecard. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 1 3 (2008) 368-386
66. PMI. A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge. third ed (2004), Project Management Institute
67. Pouloudi A., and Whitley E.A. Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems. European Journal of Information Systems 6 (1997) 1-14
68. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 1 (1990) 9-26
69. Schwandt T.A. Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms (1997), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
70. Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., Galal, G., 1999. Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. Paper presented at the 10th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.
71. Shenhar A.J., Dvir D., Levy O., and Maltz A.C. Project success: a multi-dimensional strategic perspective. Long Range Planning 34 (2001) 699-725
72. Shenhar A.J., Tisler A., Dvir D., Lipostevsky S., and Lechler T. Refining the search for project success factors: a multivariate typographical approach. R and D Management 32 2 (2002) 111-126
73. Siau, K., Sheng, H., Nah, F.F.-H., 2004. The value of mobile commerce to customers. Paper presented at the Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, Washington, D.C.
74. Standish, 1994. The chaos report: The Standish Group International.
75. Stewart R.A. A framework for the life cycle management of information technology projects: Projectit. International Journal of Project Management 26 (2008) 203-212
76. Thamhain H. Designing modern project management systems for a radically changing world. Project Management Journal 25 4 (1994)
77. The Standish Group, 2001. Extreme chaos.
78. The Standish Group, 2004. 2004 third quarter research report: The Standish Group International.
79. Wateridge J. How can is/it projects be measured for success?. International Journal of Project Management 16 1 (1998) 59-63
80. Wegelius-Lehtonen T. Performance measurement in construction logistics. International Journal of Production Economics 69 1 (2001) 107-116
81. White D., and Fortune J. Current practice in project management-an empirical study. International Journal of Project Management 20 (2002) 1-11
82. Winter M., Smith C., Cooke-Davies T., and Cicmil S. The importance of 'process' in rethinking project management: the story of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management 24 (2006) 650-662
83. Winter M., Smith C., Morris P., and Cicmil S. Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management 24 (2006) 638-649
84. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. second ed (1994), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
85. Yin R.K. Applications of Case Study Research. second ed (2003), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
86. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Designs and Methods. third ed (2003), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA