Retrieval savings with nonidentical elements: The case of simple addition and subtraction

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 938-944

  Campbell, Jamie I D ^a   Agnew, Heather ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MEMORY; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74849087591     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.938     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barrouillet, P., Mignon, M., & Thevenot, C. (2008). Strategies in subtraction problem solving in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 233-251. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.12.001
2. Campbell, J. I. D. (1999). Division by multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27, 791-802.
3. Campbell, J. I. D. (2008). Subtraction by addition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1094-1102. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1094
4. Campbell, J. I. D., Fuchs-Lacelle, S., & Phenix, T. L. (2006). Identical elements model of arithmetic memory: Extension to addition and subtraction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 633-647.
5. Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299-315. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.299
6. Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218-224. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008
7. LeFevre, J.-A., DeStefano, D., Penner-Wilger, M., & Daley, K. E. (2006). Selection of procedures in mental subtraction. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 209-220. doi:10.1037/cjep2006020
8. LeFevre, J.-A., & Morris, J. (1999). More on the relation between division and multiplication in simple arithmetic: Evidence for mediation of division solutions via multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27, 803-812.
9. Mauro, D. G., LeFevre, J.-A., & Morris, J. (2003). Effects of problem format on division and multiplication performance: Division facts are mediated via multiplication-based representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 163-170. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.163
10. Rickard, T. C. (1997). Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 288-311. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.288
11. Rickard, T. C. (2005). A revised identical elements model of arithmetic fact representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 250-257. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.250
12. Rickard, T. C., & Bajic, D. (2006). Cued recall from image and sentence memory: A shift from episodic to identical elements representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 734-748. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.734
13. Rickard, T. C., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1996). Some tests of an identical elements model of basic arithmetic skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1281-1295. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1281
14. Rickard, T. C., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1994). On the cognitive structure of basic arithmetic skills: Operand order, symbol, and operation transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1139-1153. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1139
15. Seyler, D. J., Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2003). Elementary subtraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1339-1352. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1339
16. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261. doi:10.1037/h0074898