Chapter 59 Self-centered Fairness in Games with More Than Two Players

Handbook of Experimental Economics Results

Volumn 1, Issue C, 2008, Pages 531-540

  Bolton, Gary E ^a   Ockenfels, Axel ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE SCIENCE OF HUMAN HISTORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74749083517     PISSN: 15740722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00059-5     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Babcock L., and Loewenstein G. Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (1997) 109-126
2. Bolton G.E. A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review 81 (1991) 1096-1136
3. Bolton G.E., and Ockenfels A. Strategy and equity: An ERC-analysis of the Güth-van Damme game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42 (1998) 215-226
4. Bolton G.E., and Ockenfels A. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review 90 1 (2000) 166-193
5. Bolton, Gary E., Ockenfels, Axel (2001). "A stress test of fairness measures in models of social utility". Working paper, Penn State University
6. Bolton, Gary E., Brandts, Jordi, Ockenfels, Axel (2001). "Fair procedures: Evidence from games involving lotteries". Working paper, Max Planck Institute, Jena
7. Bolton G.E., Katok E., and Zwick R. Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. International Journal of Game Theory 27 (1998) 269-299
8. Desvousges W.H., Johnson F.R., Dunford R.W., Boyle K.J., Hudson S.P., and Wilson K.N. Measuring natural resource damages using contingent valuation: Tests of validity and reliability. In: Hausman J. (Ed). Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment (1993), North-Holland Press, Amsterdam 91-164
9. Fehr E., and Schmidt K. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999) 817-868
10. Güth W., and van Damme E. Information, strategic behavior and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42 (1998) 227-247
11. Hanemann W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1994) 19-43
12. Kagel J., Kim C., and Moser D. Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games and Economic Behavior 13 (1996) 100-110
13. Kahneman D., and Knetsch J.L. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (1992) 57-70
14. Mitzkewitz M., and Nagel R. Envy, greed and anticipation in ultimatum games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory 22 (1993) 171-198
15. Rapoport, Amnon, Sundali, James A., Potter, Richard E. (1992). "Ultimatum games with incomplete information: Effects of the variability of the pie size". Mimeo, University of Arizona
16. Roth A.E. Bargaining experiments. In: Kagel J., and Roth A.E. (Eds). Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton University Press, Princeton
17. Roth A.E., Prasnikar V., Okuno-Fujiwara M., and Zamir S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo. American Economic Review 81 (1991) 1068-1095
18. Selten R., and Ockenfels A. An experimental solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34 (1998) 517-539