BioPPISVMExtractor: A protein-protein interaction extractor for biomedical literature using SVM and rich feature sets

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 88-96

  Yang, Zhihao ^a   Lin, Hongfei ^a   Li, Yanpeng ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Conditional random fields; Information extraction; Protein protein interaction; Support vector machines; Text mining

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; TEXT MINING;

CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; FEATURE EXTRACTION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

PROTEINS;

ARTICLE; BIOPPSVMEXTRACTOR; DATA EXTRACTION; DATA MINING; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

AREA UNDER CURVE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ESCHERICHIA COLI; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LANGUAGE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 74649083091     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Zanzoni A., Montecchi-Palazzi L., Quondam M., Ausiello G., Helmer-Citterich M., and Cesareni G. Mint: a molecular interaction database. FEBS Lett 513 1 (2002) 135-140
2. Bader G., Betel D., and Hogue C. BIND - the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res 31 1 (2001) 248-250
3. Bairoch A., and Apweiler R. The swiss-prot protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 28 1 (2000) 45-48
4. Xenarios I., Fernandez E., Salwinski L., Duan X.J., Thompson M.J., Marcotte E.M., et al. DIP: the database of interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 28 1 (2000) 289-291
5. Blaschke C., and Valencia A. The frame-based module of the Suiseki information extraction system. IEEE Intell Syst 17 2 (2002) 14-20
6. Ono T., Hishigaki H., Tanigam A., and Takagi T. Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature. Bioinformatics 17 2 (2001) 155-161
7. Leroy G, Chen H, Martinez J, Eggers S, Falsey R, Kislin K, et al. Genescene: biomedical text and data mining. In: Proc. the third ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Houston, TX, May 27-31; 2003.
8. Corney D.P., Buxton B.F., Langdon W.B., and Jones D.T. BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers. Bioinformatics 20 17 (2004) 3206-3213
9. Sekimizu T., Park H.S., and Tsujii J. Identifying the interaction between genes and gene products based on frequently seen verbs in MEDLINE abstracts. Genome Inform 9 (1998) 62-71
10. Pustejovsky J, Castano J, Zhang J, Kotecki M, Cochran B. Robust relational parsing over biomedical literature: extracting inhibit relations. In: Proc. the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Hawaii, USA; 2002.
11. Leroy G., Chen H., and Martinez J.D. A shallow parser based on closed-class words to capture relations in biomedical text. J Biomed Inform 36 3 (2003) 145-158
12. Temkin J.M., and Gilder M.R. Extraction of protein interaction information from unstructured text using a context-free grammar. Bioinformatics 19 16 (2003) 2046-2053
13. Rinaldi F, Schneider G, Kaljurand K, Dowdall J, Andronis C, Persidis A, et al. Mining relations in the GENIA corpus. In: Proc. Second European Workshop on Data Mining and Text Mining for Bioinformatics; 2004.
14. Fundel K., Küffner R., and Zimmer R. RelEx - relation extraction using dependency parse trees. Bioinformatics 23 3 (2007) 365-371
15. Ding J, Berleant D, Xu J, Fulmer AW. Extracting biochemical interactions from MEDLINE using a link grammar parser. In: Proc. the 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'03). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, Nov 3-5; 2003.
16. Ahmed ST, Chidambaram D, Davulcu H, Baral C. IntEx: a syntactic role driven protein-protein interaction extractor for bio-medical text. In: Proc. the ACL-ISMB Workshop on Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases: Mining Biological Semantics, Detroit, Michigan, June; 2005.
17. Marcotte E.M., Xenarios I., and Eisenberg D. Mining literature for protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 17 4 (2001) 359-363
18. Donaldson I., Martin J., de Bruijn B., Wolting C., Lay V., et al. Pre-BIND and textomy-mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinform 4 1 (2003) 11
19. Xiao J, Su J, Zhou GD, Tan CL. Protein-protein interaction extraction: a supervised learning approach. In: Proc. the First International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine, Hinxton, UK, April 10-13; 2005.
20. Zhou D, He Y, Kwoh CK. Extracting protein-protein interactions from the literature using the Hidden Vector State Model. In: Proc. International workshop on bioinformatics research and applications, Reading, UK; 2006.
21. Airola A., Pyysalo S., Björne J., Pahikkala T., Ginter F., and Salakoski T. All-paths graph kernel for protein-protein interaction extraction with evaluation of cross-corpus learning. BMC Bioinform 9 Suppl. 11 (2008) S2
22. Hunter L., Lu Z., Firby J., Baumgartner W.A., Johnson H.L., Ogren P.V., et al. OpenDMAP: an open-source, ontology-driven concept analysis engine, with applications to capturing knowledge regarding protein transport, protein interactions and cell-specific gene expression. BMC Bioinform 9 (2008) 78
23. Bunescu R., Ge R., Kate R., Marcotte E., Mooney R., Ramani A., et al. Comparative experiments on learning information extractors for proteins and their interactions. Artif Intell Med 33 2 (2005) 139-155
24. Pyysalo S., GinterF H.J., Björne J., Boberg J., Järvinen J., Salakoski T., et al. BMC Bioinform 8 (2007) 50
25. Fundel K., Kuffner R., and Zimmer R. RelEx-Relation extraction using dependency parse trees. Bioinformatics 23 3 (2007) 365-371
26. Ding J, Berleant D, Nettleton D, Wurtele E. Mining MEDLINE: abstracts, sentences, or phrases? In: Proc. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Hawaii, USA; 2002.
27. Nédellec C. Learning language in logic-genic interaction extraction challenge. In: Proc. the 4th Learning Language in Logic Workshop, Bonn, Germany; 2005.
28. Blaschke C., and Valencia A. Can bibliographic pointers for known biological data be found automatically? Protein interactions as a case study. Comp Funct Genomics 2 4 (2001) 196-206
29. Yang Z.H., Lin H.F., and Wu B.D. BioPPIExtractor: a protein-protein interaction extraction system for biomedical literature. Expert Syst Appl 36 2P1 (2009) 2228-2233
30. Yang Z.H., Lin H.F., and Li Y.P. Exploiting the contextual cues for bio-entity name recognition in biomedical literature. J Biomed Inform 41 4 (2008) 580-587
31. Tsuruoka Y, Tateishi Y, Kim JD, Ohta T, McNaught J, Ananiadou S, et al. Developing a robust part-of-speech tagger for biomedical text. In: Proc. the 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics. Volos, Greece, Nov; 2005.
32. Kim J.D., Ohta T., Tateisi Y., and Tsujii J. GENIA corpus - a semantically annotated corpus for bio-text mining. Bioinformatics 19 Suppl. 1 (2003) i180-i182
33. McDonald R., and Pereira F. Identifying gene and protein mentions in text using conditional random fields. BMC Bioinform 6 Suppl. 1 (2005) S6
34. Vapnik V.N. The nature of statistical learning theory (1995), Springer-Verlag, NY
35. Sugiyama K., Hatano K., Yoshikawa M., and Uemura S. Extracting information on protein-protein interactions from biological literature based on machine learning approaches. Genome Inform 14 (2003) 699-700
36. Joachims T. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Proc. the European Conference on Machine Learning; 1998, p. 137-42.
37. Joachims T. A statistical learning model of text classification with support vector machines. In: Proc.the 24th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR); 2001, p. 128-36.
38. Gimenez J, Marquez L. Fast and accurate Part-of-Speech tagging: the SVM approach revisited. In: Proc. the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing; 2003, p. 158-65.
39. Keerthi S., and DeCoste D. A modified finite Newton method for fast solution of large scale linear SVMs. J Mach Learn Res 6 (2005) 341-361
40. Joachims T. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In: Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1999, p. 169-84 [Chapter 11].
41. Sleator D, Temperley D. Parsing English with a Link Grammar. Carnegie Mellon University Computer Science technical report CMU-CS-91-196, Carnegie Mellon University; 1991.
42. Grinberg D, Lafferty J, Sleator D. A robust parsing algorithm for LINK Grammars. In: Proc. the Second International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference and Applications, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. vol. 862, Springer-Verlag, p.78-92; 1994.
43. Hanley J.A., and McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology 143 1 (1982) 29-36
44. Bradley A.P. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognit 30 7 (1997) 1145-1159
45. Buckland M., and Gey F. The relationship between recall and precision. J Am Soc Info Sci 45 1 (1994) 12-19
46. Pyysalo S., Airola A., Heimonen J., Björne J., Ginter F., and Salakoski T. Comparative analysis of five protein-protein interaction Corpora. BMC Bioinform 9 Suppl. 3 (2008) S6