An integrated framework for the hydrologic simulation of a complex geomorphological river basin

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 381, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 308-321

  Kourgialas, Nektarios N ^a   Karatzas, George P ^a   Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Energy Budget Snow Melt; GIS; HSPF model; Karstic modeling; Koiliaris River Basin; Surface flow modeling

Indexed keywords

ENERGY BUDGETS; HSPF MODELS; KARSTIC; RIVER BASINS; SNOW MELT; SURFACE FLOW;

BUDGET CONTROL; COILED TUBING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROGEOLOGY; LAND USE; MATLAB; RIVERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SNOW;

WATERSHEDS;

DISCHARGE; ENERGY BUDGET; GEOMORPHOLOGY; GIS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROGEOLOGY; KARST HYDROLOGY; RIVER BASIN; SNOWMELT; WATERSHED;

CANEA; CRETE; GREECE; KOILIARIS BASIN;

EID: 74549215118     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Al-Abed N.A., and Whiteley H.R. Calibration of the hydrological simulation program Fortran (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems. Hydrological Processes 16 (2002) 3169-3188
2. Albek M., Öǧütveren U., and Albek E. Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu watershed (Turkey) with HSPF. Journal of Hydrology 285 (2004) 260-271
3. Anderson E.A. Development and testing of snowpack energy balance equations. Water Resources Research 4 (1968) 19-37
4. Anderson, E.A., 1973. National Weather Service River Forecast System - snow accumulation and ablation model, NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS-HYDRO-17, United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Washington, DC, USA.
5. Baker D.G., Ruschy D.L., and Wall D.B. The albedo decay of prairie snows. American Meteorological Society 29 (1990) 179-187
6. Bicknell, B.R., Imhoff, J.C., Kittle Jr., J.L., Donigian Jr., A.S., Johanson, R.C., 1993. Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN. User's Manual for Release 10. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.
7. Bicknell, B.R., Imhoff, J.S., Kittle, J.L., Jobes, T.H., Donigian, A.S., 2001. Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF): User's Manual -Version 12. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, USA.
8. Bras L.R. Hydrology: An Introduction to Hydrologic Science (1989), Massachusetts Institute of Technology
9. Coulibaly P., and Baldwin C.K. Nonstationary hydrological time series forecasting using nonlinear dynamic methods. Journal of Hydrology 307 (2005) 164-174
10. Dingman S.L. Physical Hydrology (1994), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
11. Eadie W.T., Drijard D., James F.E., Roos M., and Sadoulet B. Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics (1971), North-Holland, Amsterdam pp. 269-271
12. Eagleson P.S. Dynamic Hydrology (1970), McGraw-Hill, New York
13. ESRI, 2006. ArcView 9.2 User Manuals, Environmental System Research Institute, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373, USA.
14. Ganju A., Satyawali P.K., Singh A., and Sethi D.N. Snowcover simulation model - a review. Defence Science Journal 49 5 (1999) 419-436
15. Gemitzi A., Petalas C., Tzihrintzis V.A., and Pisinaras V. Assessment of groundwater Vulnerability to pollution: a combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environmental Geology 49 (2006) 653-673
16. Jaquet O., Siegel P., Klubertanz G., and Benabderrhamane H. Stochastic discrete model of karstic networks. Advances in Water Resources 27 (2004) 751-760
17. Kim S.M., Benham B.L., Brannan K.M., Zeckoski R.W., and Doherty J. Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methods. Water Resources Research 43 (2007) W01402
18. Kirchner W.J. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: linking measurements, analysis, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research 42 (2006) W03S04 10.1029/2005WR004362
19. Kourgialas, N.N., Karatzas, P.G., Nikolaidis, P.N., 2008. Simulation of the flow in the Koiliaris River basin (Greece) using a combination of GIS, the HSPF model and a karstic - snow melt model. In: 4th Biennial International Congress of iEMSs, Barcelona Spain, vol. 1, pp. 512-520.
20. Laramie R.L., and Schaake J.C. Simulation of the Continuous Snowmelt Process (1972), MIT Department of Civil Engineering, Cambridge, MA (Technical report no. 143)
21. Li S., Zhou X., and Morris K. Measurement of snow and sea ice surface temperature and emissivity in the Ross Sea. IEEE Journal (1999) (0-7803-5207-6/99)
22. Maillet E. Essais d' hydraulique sonterraine et fluviaie (1905), Herman, Paris
23. Mazurkiewicz A.B., Callery D.G., and McDonnell J.J. Assessing the controls of the snow energy balance and water available for runoff in a rain-on-snow environment. Journal of Hydrology 354 (2008) 1-14
24. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual model. 1: discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 3 (1970) 282-290
25. Nikolaidis P.N., Nikolaidis V.S., and Schnoor J.L. Assessment of episodic freshwater acidification in the Sierra Nevada, California. Aquatic Sciences 53 4 (1991) 330-345
26. Ohara N., and Kawas M.L. Field observations and numerical model experiments for the snowmelt process at a field site. Advances in Water Resources 29 (2005) 154-160
27. Portland State Aerospace Society, 2004. A Quick Derivation relating altitude to air pressure. Version 1.03.
28. Sensoy A., Sorman A.A., Tekeli A.E., Sorman A.U., and Garen D.C. Point-scale energy and mass balance snowpack simulations in the upper Karasu basin, Turkey. Hydrological Processes 20 (2006) 899-922
29. Shaban Α., Khawlie Μ., Bou Kheir R., and Abdallah C. Assessment of road instability along a typical mountainous road using GIS and aerial photos, Lebanon-eastern Mediterranean. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 60 (2001) 93-101
30. Shaban Α., Khawlie Μ., and Abdallah Ch. Use of remote sensing and GIS to determine recharge potential zones: the case of Occidental Lebanon. Hydrogeology Journal 14 (2006) 433-443
31. Smith R.M. Comparing traditional methods for selecting class intervals on choropleth maps. The Professional Geographer 38 1 (1986) 62-67
32. Stamati, F., Nikolaidis, N., Bozinakis, K., Papamastorakis, D., Kritsotakis, M., 2006. Stochastic modeling of the karstic system of western Apokoronas in Crete. In: VIII International Conference Protection and Restoration of the Environment VIII, Chania, Greece, pp. 184-192.
33. Tzoraki O., and Nikolaidis N.P. A generalized framework for modeling the hydrologic and biogeochemical response of a Mediterranean temporary river basin. Journal of Hydrology 346 (2007) 112-121
34. US Army Corps of Engineers, 1956. Snow Hydrology. Department of Commerce, Office of Technical Services, Washington, DC (PB 151660).
35. Viswanathan, C., Teegavarapu, R.S., Ormsbee, L., 2005. Surface water assessment and hydrologic modeling under Karst aquifer conditions. In: American Geophysical Union Conference, November-December 2005, AGU Conference, San Francisco, USA.
36. White W.B. Karst hydrology: recent developments and open questions. Engineering Geology 65 2-3 (2002) 85-105
37. Winkler, R.D., 2001. The effects of forest structure on snow accumulation and melt in South-Central British Columbia. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy the University of British Columbia.
38. Yang Z.-L., and Dickinson R.E. Validation of the snow submodel of the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme with Russian snow cover and meteorological observational data. Journal of Climate 10 (1997) 353-373