Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methods

Water Resources Research

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Kim, Sang Min ^a   Benham, Brian L ^a   Brannan, Kevin M ^a   Zeckoski, Rebecca W ^a   Doherty, John ^b,c  

^a State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c Watermark Numerical Computing   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EXPERT SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HYDROLOGIC CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGICAL SIMULATION PROGRAM-FORTRAN (HSPF); SURFACE WATER MODELING;

HYDROLOGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EXPERT SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BASEFLOW; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXPERT SYSTEM; HYDROLOGICAL CHANGE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SOFTWARE; SURFACE WATER;

EID: 33847748226     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2006WR004883     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Benham, B. L., K. M. Brannan, S. M. Morris, G. R. Yagow, and R. W. Zeckoski (2005), Bacteria total maximum daily load development for North River, Va. Dep. of Environ. Qual., Richmond. (Available at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/ tmdl)
2. Bicknell, B. R., J. C. Imhoff, J. L. Kittle Jr., T. H. Jobes, and A. S. Donigan Jr. (2001), Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF): User's manual for release 12, U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Athens, Ga.
3. Boyle, D. P., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian (2000), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36(12), 3663-3674.
4. Brazil, L. E. (1988), Multilevel calibration strategy for complex hydrologic simulation models, Ph.D. dissertation, 217 pp., Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins.
5. Doherty, J. (2004), PEST: Model-independent parameter estimation, User manual: 5th ed., Watermark Numer. Comput., Brisbane, Queensl., Australia.
6. Doherty, J., and J. M. Johnston (2003), Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39, 251-265.
7. Environmental Systems Research Institute (2003), ArcGIS 8.3, Redlands, Calif.
8. Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo (1998), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751-763.
9. Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo (1999), Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration, J. Hydrol. Eng., 4(2), 135-143.
10. Hummel, P., J. Kittle Jr., and M. Gray (2005), WDMUtil version 2.0 user's manual, Off. of Water, U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, D. C. (Available at http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/b3docs/wdmutil. zip)
11. Lawson, L. G. (2003), Guidance memo 03-2012: HSPF model calibration and verification for bacteria TMDLs, Va. Dep. of Environ. Qual., Richmond. (Available at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/waterguidance/pdf/032012.pdf)
12. Lumb, A. M., R. B. McCammon, and J. L. Kittle (1994), Users manual for an EXPert System (HSPEXP) for calibration on the Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 94-4168.
13. Madsen, H. (2000), Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives, J. Hydrol., 235, 276-288.
14. Madsen, H., G. Wilson, and H. C. Ammentorp (2002), Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models, J. Hydrol., 261, 48-59.
15. Marquardt, D. W. (1963), An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 11(2), 431-441.
16. Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe (1970), River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290.
17. National Resource Conservation Service (2004), Regional hydraulic geometry curves, Natl. Water Manage. Cent., Little Rock, Ark. (Available at http:/wmc.ar.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/HHSWR/Geomorphic/index.html)
18. Sloto, R. A., and M. Y. Crouse (1996), HYSEP: A computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 96-4040, 46 pp.
19. Southeast Regional Climate Center (2004), Dale Enterprise, Virginia (442208): Period of record monthly climate summary-1 August 1948 to 31 March 2004, S.C. Dep. of Nat. Resour., Columbia. (Available at http://cirrus.dnr. state.sc.us/cgi-bin/sercc/cliMAIN.pl?va2208)
20. Staley, N., T. Bright, R. W. Zeckoski, B. L. Benham, and K. M. Brannan (2006), Comparison of HSPF outputs using FTABLES generated with field survey and digital data, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(5), 1153-1162.
21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999), BASINS technical note 5: Using HSPEXP with BASINS/NPSM, EPA-823-R-99-OIO, Off. of Water, Washington, D. C. (Available at http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/tecnote5. pdf)
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000), BASINS technical note 6: Estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF, EPA-823-R-00-012, Off. of Water, Washington, D. C.
23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2001), The national costs of the total maximum daily load program, EPA 841-D-01-003, Washington, D. C. (Available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/tmdl/coststudy/coststudy. pdf)
24. U.S. Geological Survey (2005), Daily streamflow for the nation, Washington, D. C. (Available at http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/ discharge)
25. Yapo, P. O., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian (1998), Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 204, 83-97.