NVH analysis and improvement of a vehicle body structure using DOE method

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2980-2989

  Azadi, Shahram ^a   Azadi, Mohammad ^b   Zahedi, Farshad ^a  

^a K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

DOE method; FEM; Frequency map; Modal analysis; NVH; RSM; Vehicle body

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MODAL ANALYSIS; VIBRATION ANALYSIS; AUTOMOBILE BODIES; DENSITY (OPTICAL); DIFFRACTIVE OPTICAL ELEMENTS; VEHICLES;

DOE METHODS; FORCED VIBRATION; FREQUENCY MAP; NOISE , VIBRATION AND HARSHNESS; NVH PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE MAP; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; VEHICLE BODY; BEFORE AND AFTER; CAR BODIES; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS METHODS; DOE METHOD; NASTRAN;

AUTOMOBILE BODIES; AUTOMOBILE PARTS AND EQUIPMENT;

EID: 74549163577     PISSN: 1738494X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-009-0909-z     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. S. Kodiyalam, High performance computing for multidisciplinary design optimization and robustness of vehicle structures, Bathe KJ (ed) 2nd M. I. T. Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Elsevier, Oxford, (2003) 2305-2307.
2. S. Kodiyalam and J. Sobieski, Multidisciplinary design optimization: some formal methods, framework requirements, and application to vehicle design, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 25(1/2) (2001) 3-22.
3. F. Duddeck, A. Kropp and S. Wegner, Multicriteria evolutionary optimization for car body acoustics. In: Schilling R, Haase W, Periaux J, Baier H, Bugeda G (eds) Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial and Societal Problems, EUROGEN 2005, (2005) 1-12.
4. A. Kropp, Robust acoustic vehicle body design using evolutionary algorithms, International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA2006, Leuven, (2006).
5. F. Duddeck, D. Heiserer and J. Lescheticky, Stochastic methods for optimization of crash and NVH problems, Bathe KJ (ed) 2nd M. I. T. Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Elsevier, Oxford, (2003) 2265-2268.
6. R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology, Wiley, New York, (1995).
7. U. Schramm, Multi-disciplinary optimization for NVH and crashworthiness, Bathe KJ (ed) 1st M. I. T. Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Elsevier, Oxford, (2001) 721-724.
8. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, S. Kodiyalam and R. J. Yang, Optimization of car body under constraints of noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH), and crash, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, (2000) 1521.
9. N. Stander and K. J. Craig, On the robustness of a simple domain reduction scheme for simulation based optimization, Engineering Computer Review, 19(4) (2002) 431-450.
10. C. Wauquiez, K. Kayvantash, S. Masfrand, T. Bekkour and F. Arnaudeau, Mass minimization of vehicle structure subject to varying crashworthiness constraints: a prediction-correction approach, Bathe KJ (ed) 3rd M. I. T. Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Elsevier, Oxford, (2005) 1320-1323.