A dataset and evaluation methodology for template-based tracking algorithms

Science and Technology Proceedings - IEEE 2009 International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 145-151

  Lieberknecht, Sebastian ^a   Benhimane, Selim ^a   Meier, Peter ^a   Navab, Nassir ^b  

^a Metaio GmbH

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARK DATASETS; CAMERA MOTIONS; CRITICAL PARAMETER; DATA SETS; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; EVALUATION SCHEME; GROUND TRUTH; HIGH-PRECISION; IMAGE SEQUENCE; INTER-FRAME; LIGHTING CONDITIONS; MULTI-VIEW STEREO; OBJECT DETECTION; REAL SCENES; STATE-OF-THE-ART ALGORITHMS; TEMPLATE-BASED TRACKING; TRACKING ALGORITHM;

AUGMENTED REALITY; CAMERAS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; OPTICAL FLOWS; TEXTURES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 74549145047     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR.2009.5336487     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. AICON 3D Systems GmbH. http://aicon.de/.
2. Allied Vision Technologies GmbH. http://alliedvisiontec.com/.
3. S. Baker and I. Matthews. Lucas-kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework. IJCV, 56(3):221-255, 2004.
4. S. Baker, D. Scharstein, J. Lewis, S. Roth, M. J. Black, and R. Szeliski. A database and evaluation methodology for optical flow. In ICCV, pages 1-8, 2007.
5. H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, and L. J. V. Gool. Surf: Speeded up robust features. In ECCV, pages 404-417, 2006.
6. S. Benhimane and E. Malis. Homography-based 2d visual tracking and servoing. International Journal of Robotic Research, 26(7):661-676, 2007.
7. FARO Europe GmbH & Co. KG. http://faro.com/.
8. D. J. Heeger. Model for the extraction of image flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(8):1455-1471, 1987.
9. G. Klein and D. Murray. Parallel tracking and mapping for small ar workspaces. In ISMAR, pages 225-234, 2007.
10. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
11. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. Scale and affine invariant interest point detectors. IJCV, 60(1):63-86, 2004.
12. P. Moreels and P. Perona. Evaluation of features detectors and descriptors based on 3d objects. International Journal of Computer Vision, 73(3):263-284, 2007.
13. M. Özuysal, P. Fua, and V. Lepetit. Fast keypoint recognition in ten lines of code. In CVPR, pages 1-8, 2007.
14. K. Pentenrieder, P. Meier, and G. Klinker. Analysis of tracking accuracy for single-camera square-marker-based tracking. In Proc. Dritter Workshop Virtuelle und Erweiterte Realität der GI-Fachgruppe VR/AR, 2006.
15. C. J. Price, I. D. Coope, and D. Byatt. A convergent variant of the nelder-mead algorithm. J. Optim. Theory Appl., 113(1):5-19, 2002.
16. S. M. Seitz, B. Curless, J. Diebel, D. Scharstein, and R. Szeliski. A comparison and evaluation of multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. In CVPR, pages 519-528, 2006.
17. R. Szeliski, R. Zabih, D. Scharstein, O. Veksler, V. Kolmogorov, A. Agarwala, M. Tappen, and C. Rother. A comparative study of energy minimization methods for markov random fields with smoothness-based priors. PAMI, 30(6):1068-1080, 2008.
18. R. Y. Tsai and R. K. Lenz. A new technique for fully autonomous and efficient 3d robotics hand/eye calibration. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5(3):345-358, 1989.
19. A. Vedaldi and B. Fulkerson. VLFeat: An open and portable library of computer vision algorithms. http://www.vlfeat.org/, 2008.
20. D. Wagner, G. Reitmayr, A. Mulloni, T. Drummond, and D. Schmalstieg. Pose tracking from natural features on mobile phones. In ISMAR, pages 125-134, 2008.
21. K. Zimmerman, J. Matas, and T. Svoboda. Tracking by an optimal sequence of linear predictors. PAMI, 31(4):677-692, April 2009.