Firm strategy and the Canadian voluntary climate challenge and registry (VCR)

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 360-379

  Brouhle, Keith ^a   Harrington, Donna Ramirez ^b  

^a GRINNELL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change policy; Firm strategy; Voluntary environmental initiatives

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; CLIMATE CHANGE; CORPORATE STRATEGY; PERCEPTION; REGULATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; UTILITY SECTOR; VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

CANADA;

EID: 74549132181     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.604     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alberini A, Segerson K. 2002. Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality. Environmental and Resource Economics 22(1/2): 157-184.
2. Anton WR, Deltas G, Khanna M. 2004. Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48(1): 632-654.
3. Arora S, Cason TN. 1996. Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 Program. Land Economics 72(4): 413-432.
4. Arora S, Gangopadhyay S. 1995. Toward a Theoretical Model of Voluntary Overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28(3): 289-309.
5. Bernstein S. 2002. International institutions and the framing of domestic policies: the Kyoto Protocol and Canada's response to climate change. Policy Sciences 35: 203-236.
6. British Petroleum. 2007. www.bp.com/genericsection.do?categoryId=6905&contentId=7030746 [5 August 2007].
7. Brouhle K, Griffiths C, Wolverton A. 2004. The use of voluntary approaches for environmental policymaking in the U.S. In The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements, Croci E (ed.). Springer: New York.
8. Brouhle K, Griffiths C, Wolverton A. 2007. Evaluating the Effectiveness of EPA Voluntary Programs: An Examination of the Strategic Goals Program for Metal Finishers, EPA working paper series.
9. Cavaliere A. 2000. Overcompliance and voluntary agreements. Environmental and Resource Economics 17: 195-202.
10. Clarkson M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20: 92-117.
11. Dow Chemicals. 2007. www.dow.com/commitments/studies/wrap.htm [5 August 2007].
12. Francis D. 1999. Some promises better not kept. Financial Post 26 June: D3.
13. Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston, MA.
14. Gibson R. 1999. Voluntary Initiatives and the New Politics of Corporate Greening. Broadview: Ontario.
15. Government of Canada. 1995. National Action Programme on Climate Change.
16. Government of Canada. 2000. Action Plan 2000 on Climate Change.
17. Government of Canada. 2002. Climate Change Plan for Canada. www.climatechange.gc.ca [8 March 2007].
18. Government of Canada. 2005. Project Green: Moving Forward on Climate Change: a Plan for Honouring our Kyoto Commitment.
19. Government of Canada. 2006. Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development to the House of Commons, Office of the Auditor General of Canada.
20. Government of Ontario. 2007. www.2ontario.com/facts/fact02.asp [8 March 2007].
21. Harrison K. 1995. Is cooperation the answer? Canadian environmental enforcement in comparative context. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14(2): 221-244.
22. Harrison K. 2002. Ideas and environmental standard-setting: a comparative study of regulation of the pulp and paper industry. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 15(1): 65-96.
23. Hart SL. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4): 986-1014.
24. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381-395.
25. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 87-99.
26. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 2007. Environmental technical and administrative innovations in the Canadian manufacturing industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 16: 119-132.
27. Hornung R. 1999. The VCR does not work. In Voluntary Initiatives: the New Politics of Corporate Greening, Gibson RB (ed.). Broadview: Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 134-140.
28. Howlett M. 2002. Policy instruments and implementation styles: the evolution of instrument choice in Canadian environmental policy. In Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, VanNijnatten DL, Boardman R (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford. 25-45.
29. Kennedy PW. 2002. Optimal early action for greenhouse gases. Canadian Journal of Economics 35(1): 16-35.
30. Khanna M. 2001. Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection. Journal of Economic Surveys 15(3): 291-324.
31. Khanna M, Damon L. 1999. EPA's voluntary 33/50 Program: impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37: 1-25.
32. Khanna M, Ramirez DT. 2004. Effectiveness of voluntary approaches; implications for climate change mitigation. In Voluntary Approaches in Climate Policy, Baranzini A, Thalmann P (eds). Elgar: Cheltenham UK. 31-66.
33. Litfin KT. 2000. Advocacy coalitions along the domestic-foreign frontier: globalization and Canadian climate change policy. Policy Studies Journal 28(1): 236-252.
34. Lucas A. 2002. The Alberta energy sector's voluntary approach to climate change: context, prospects, and limits. In Canadian Energy Policy and the Struggle for Sustainable Development, Doern B (ed.). University of Toronto Press: Toronto. 293-310.
35. Macdonald D. 2002. The business response to environmentalism. In Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, VanNijnatten DL, Boardman R (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford.
36. Macdonald D, Mercier J, Crete J, Gonzales P, Le Gars A. 2006. Why do governments select voluntarism as an environmental policy instrument? CPSA Conference, York.
37. Mann HB, Whitney DR. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18: 50-60.
38. Maxwell JW, Lyon TP. 2002. Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation. In Economic Institutions and Environmental Policy, Franzini M, Nicita A (eds). Ashgate: Hampshire UK. 142-174.
39. Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett SC. 2000. Self-regulation and social welfare: the political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics 43: 583-617.
40. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1999. Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: as Assessment. OECD: Paris.
41. Paehlke R. 2000. Environmentalism in one country: Canadian environmental policy in an era of globalization. Policy Studies Journal 28(1): 160-175.
42. Paton B. 2000. Voluntary environmental initiatives and sustainable industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 9(5): 328-338.
43. Paton B. 2001. Efficiency gains within firms under voluntary environmental initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 9: 167-178.
44. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97-118.
45. Potoski M, Prakash A. 2005a. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms' regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 235-248.
46. Potoski M, Prakash A. 2005b. Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(4): 745-769.
47. Segerson K, Miceli T. 1998. Voluntary environmental agreements: good or bad news for environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 109-130.
48. Sharma S, Vredenburg H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19: 729-753.
49. Smith HA. 2002. Dollar discourse: the devaluation of Canada's natural capital in Canadian climate change policy. In Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, VanNijnatten DL, Boardman R (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford. 286-298.
50. Statistics Canada. 2007. http://www40.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/getcans/sorth.cgi?lan=eng&dtype=fina&filename=econ15.htm&sortact=2&sortf=2 [8 March 2007].
51. Stilborn J. 2003. Canadian intergovernmental relations and the Kyoto Protocol: what happened, what didn't? CPSA Conference, 2003, Session A2, Challenges to Canadian Federalism.
52. Takahashi T, Nakamura M, van Kooten GC, Vertinsky GC. 2001. Rising to the Kyoto challenge: is the response of Canadian industry adequate? Journal of Environmental Management 63: 149-161.
53. Valiante M. 2002. Legal foundations of Canadian environmental policy: underlining our values in a shifting landscape. In Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, VanNijnatten DL, Boardman R (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford. 4-9.
54. VanNijnatten DL. 2002. The bumpy journey ahead: provincial environmental policies and national environmental standards. In Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, VanNijnatten DL, Boardman R (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford.
55. Videras J, Alberini A. 2000. The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: which firms participate and why? Contemporary Economic Policy 18(4): 449-461.
56. Voluntary Climate and Challenge Registry. 2007. http://www.ghgregistries.ca/challenge/index_e.cfm [5 August 2007].
57. Wilcoxon F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1: 80-83.