Environmental technical and administrative innovations in the Canadian manufacturing industry

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 119-132

  Henriques, Irene ^a   Sadorsky, Perry ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Administrative and technical innovations; EMS; Environmental innovation; Stakeholder theory; TQM

Indexed keywords

CLEANER PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; MANUFACTURING; STAKEHOLDER;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 33847283377     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.475     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson JC, Rungtusanathan M, Schroeder RG. 1994. A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review 19: 472-509.
2. Bansal P, Hunter T. 2003. Strategic explanations for early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics 46(3): 289-299.
3. Clarkson MBE. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20: 92-117.
4. Coglianese, C, Nash J. 2001. Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals. Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.
5. Daft RL. 1978. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal 21: 193-210.
6. Damanpour F. 1988. Innovation type, radicalness and the adoption process. Communication Research 15: 545-567.
7. Damanpour F. 1992. Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies 13(3): 375-402.
8. Darnall N. 2003. Motivations for participating in a voluntary environmental initiative: the Multi-State Working Group and EPA's EMS pilot program. In Research in Corporate Sustainability, Sharma S, Starik M (eds). Elgar: Boston, MA; 123-154.
9. Delmas M. 2000. Stakeholders and competitive advantage: the case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management 10(3): 343-358.
10. Dowell G, Hart S, Yeung B. 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science 46(8): 1059-1074.
11. Evan WM. 1966. Organizational lag. Human Organization 25: 51-53.
12. Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston, MA.
13. Freeman RE, Reed DL. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review 25(3): 93-94
14. Frooman J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24: 191-205.
15. Gladwin TN, Kennelly JJ, Krause TS. 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review 20: 874-907.
16. Hart SL, Ahuja G. 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5: 30-37.
17. Hart SL, Sharma S. 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive 18: 7-18.
18. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(3): 381-395.
19. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal 42: 87-99.
20. Ibarra H. 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal 36: 471-501.
21. Jiang RJ, Bansal P. 2003. Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies 40(4): 1047-1067.
22. Klassen RD. 2001. Plant-level environmental management orientation: the influence of management views and plant characteristics. Production and Operations Management 10(3): 257-275.
23. Klassen RD, Whybark DC. 1999a. Environmental management in operations: the selection of environmental technologies. Decision Sciences 30(3): 601-631.
24. Klassen RD, Whybark DC. 1999b. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 42: 599-615.
25. Lorente Martinez AR, Dewhurst F, Dale BG. 1999. TQM and business innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 2: 12-19.
26. Melnyk SA, Sroufe RP, Calantone R. 2003. Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management 21: 329-351.
27. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22: 853-886.
28. Montabon F, Melnyk SA, Sroufe R, Calantone RJ. 2000. ISO 14000: assessing its perceived impact on corporate performance. The Journal of Supply Chain Management Spring: 4-16.
29. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. Harper and Row: New York.
30. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97-118.
31. Rondinelli DA, Vastag G. 2000. Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management Journal 18: 499-510.
32. Rowley T. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22: 887-910.
33. Russo MV, Fouts PA. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40: 534-559.
34. Senge PM. 1990. The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday Currency: New York.
35. Sharma S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43: 681-697.
36. Sharma S, Henriques I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal 26(2):159-180.
37. Singh PJ, Smith AJR. 2004. Relationship between TQM and innovation: an empirical study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 15: 394-401.
38. Starkey R. 1998. Standardization of environmental management systems: ISO 14001, ISO 14004 and EMAS. In Corporate Environmental Management 1: Systems and Strategies, Welford R (ed) 2nd edn. Earthscan: London; 61-90.
39. Szulanski G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17: 27-43
40. Tibor T, Feldman I. 1996. ISO 14000: a Guide to the New Environmental Management Standards. Irwin: Burr Ridge, IL.
41. Walley N, Whitehead B. 1994. It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review May-June: 46-52.
42. Westphal D, Gulati R, Shortell SM. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 366-394.
43. Wood D. 1994. Business and Society. Harper Collins: New York.