'Devolution' of transport powers to Local Government: Impacts of the 2004 Traffic Management Act in England

Transport Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 64-71

  Canning, Paul E ^a,b   Hellawell, Emma E ^b   Hughes, Susan J ^b   Gatersleben, Birgitta C M ^b   Fairhead, Christopher J ^a  

^a Surrey County Council Educational Psychology Service   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Congestion; Devolution; Intelligent Transport Systems; Traffic Management Act

Indexed keywords

DEVOLUTION; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 74449092676     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bulkeley H., and Rayner T. New realism and local realities: local transport planning in Leicester and Cambridgeshire. Urban Studies 40 1 (2003) 35-55
2. Department for Transport. The Traffic Management Act (2004), The Stationery Office, London
3. Department for Transport. Traffic Management Act 2004-Network Management Duty Guidance (2004), The Stationery Office, London
4. Department for Transport, 1998. TEA-21 - Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century - Moving Americans into the 21st Century, a policy overview. 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/sumover.htm〉.
5. Dudley G., and Richardson J. Outsider groups and British roads policy. Political Studies 46 4 (1998) 727-747
6. Goodwin, P., Hallett, S., Kenny, F., Stokes, G., 1991. Transport: The New Realism. Report to the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund. University of Oxford Transport Studies Unit, Oxford
7. Guibernau M. National identity, devolution and secession in Canada, Britain and Spain. Nations and Nationalism 12 1 (2009) 51-76
8. Haynes K.E., Gifford J.L., and Pelletiere D. Sustainable transportation institutions and regional evolution: global and local perspectives. Journal of Transport Geography 13 3 (2005) 207-221
9. Lee R.W., and Rivasplata C.R. Metropolitan transport planning in the 1990s: comparisons and contrasts in New Zealand, Chile and California. Transport Policy 8 1 (2001) 47-61
10. Marvin S., and Slater S. Urban infrastructure: the contemporary conflict between roads and utilities. Progress in Planning 48 4 (1997) 247-318
11. Mawson J. Regional governance in England: past experience, future directions. International Journal of Public Sector Management 20 6 (2007) 548-566
12. Ottewell D., 2008. C-Charge: A Resounding No, Manchester Evening News, 12 December.
13. Rhodes R.A.W. The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public service in Britain. Political Quarterly 65 2 (1994) 138-151
14. Schöller-Schwedes, O., 2009. The failure of integrated transport policy in Germany: a historical perspective, Forthcoming in The Journal of Transport Geography.
15. Taylor B.D., and Scheitzer L. Assessing the experience of mandated collaborative inter-jurisdictional transport planning in the United States. Transport Policy 12 6 (2005) 500-511
16. Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy 64 5 (1956) 416-426
17. Travers, T., Glaister, S., 2008. Policy and governance. In: With the Advantage of Hindsight, The Institute of Highways and transportation, London, pp. 12-14.
18. Vigar G. Reappraising UK transport policy 1950-99: the myth of 'mono-modality' and the nature of 'paradigm shifts'. Planning Perspectives 16 3 (2001) 269-291
19. Wolf J., and Farquhar B. Assessing Progress: the state of metropolitan planning organizations under ISTEA and TEA-21. International Journal of Public Administration 28 13-14 (2005) 1057-1079