A new 2-dimensional method for constructing Visualized Treatment Objectives for distraction osteogenesis of the short mandible

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 19-25

  van Beek, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

distraction osteogenesis; distractor; open bite; planning; vectors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; ORTHODONTICS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING; TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTROPHORESIS;

CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; OPEN BITE; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING;

EID: 74449086369     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baccetti T., Stahl F., and McNamara Jr. J.A. Dentofacial growth changes in subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion from late puberty through young adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135 2 (2009 Feb) 148-154
2. Batra P., et al. Long term results of mandibular distraction. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 24 (2006) 30-39
3. Breuning K.H., Van Strijen P.J., Prahl-Andersen B., and Tuinzing D.B. The overbite and intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 32 2 (April 2004) 119-125
4. Breuning K.H., van Strijen P.J., Prahl-Andersen B., and Tuinzing D.B. Outcome of treatment of Class II malocclusion by intraoral mandibular distraction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 6 (Dec 2004) 520-525
5. Diner P.A., Kollar E.M., Martinez H., and Vazquez M.P. Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: a technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 24 2 (April 1996) 92-95
6. Gateno J., Teichgraeber J.F., and Aguilar E. Computer planning for distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 3 (March 2000) 873-882
7. Grayson B.H., McGormick S.A., Santiago P.E., and McCarth E.F. Vector of device placement and trajectory of mandibular distraction. J Craniofac Surg 8 (1997) 473
8. Grayson B.H., and Santiago P.E. Treatment planning and biomechanics of distraction osteogenesis from an orthodontic perspective. Semin Orthod 5 (1999) 9
9. Hoffmeister B., and Wangerin K. Callus distraction technique by an intraoral approach: the floating bone concept. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26 (1997) 76
10. Hurmerinta K., and Hukki J. Vector control in lower jaw distraction osteogenesis using an extra-oral multidirectional device. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 5 (2001) 263-270
11. Hwang S.J., Haers P.E., Zimmermann A., Oechslin C., Seifert B., and Sailer H.F. Surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 5 (May 2000) 542-552
12. Losken H.W., Patterson G.T., Lazarou S.A., and Whitney T. Planning mandibular distraction: preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J (1995) 71-76
13. Maeda A., Soejima K., Ogura M., Ohmure H., Sugihara K., and Miyawaki S. Orthodontic treatment combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis and changes in stomatognathic function. Angle Orthod 78 6 (Nov 2008) 1125-1132
14. Mommaerts M.Y., and Nagy K.J. Is early osteodistraction a solution for the ascending ramus compartment in hemifacial microsomia? A literature study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 30 4 (2002 Aug) 201-207
15. Nada R.M., Sugar A.W., Wijdeveld M.G., Borstlap W.A., Clauser L., Hoffmeister B., and Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M. Current practice of distraction osteogenesis for craniofacial anomalies in Europe: a web based survey. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2009) 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.014
16. Peltomäki T., Grayson B.H., Vendittelli B.L., Katzen T., and McCarthy J.G. Moulding of the generate to control open bite during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Eur J Orthod 24 6 (2002 Dec) 639-645
17. Rubio-Bueno P., Villa E., Carreño A., Naval L., Sastre J., Manzanares R., and Díaz-González F.J. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis: special attention to treatment planning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 5 (October 2001) 254-262
18. Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Cherkashin AM: Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Mosby, ISBN 0323011349; 2001
19. Samchukov L, Cope JB, Cherkasin AM: The biomechanical effects of distraction device orientation during mandibular lengthening and widening. In: Mikhail L, Samchukov Cope Jason B, Cherkashin Alexander M (eds), Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Mosby, ISBN 0323011349 2001, p. 143
20. Samchukov M.L., Cope J.B., and Cherkashin A.M. The effect of sagittal orientation of the distractor on the biomechanics of mandibular lengthening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 10 (October 1999) 1214-1221
21. Schendel S., and Link D. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis by sagittal split osteotomy and intraoral curvilinear distraction. J Craniofac Surg 15 (2004) 631
22. Schreuder W.H., Jansma J., Bierman M.W., and Vissink A. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36 2 (Feb 2007) 103-110 Epub 2007 Jan 30
23. Scolozzi P., Link D.W., and Schendel S.A. Computer simulation of curvilinear mandibular distraction: accuracy and predictability. Plast Reconstr Surg 120 7 (Dec 2007) 1975-1980