Current practice of distraction osteogenesis for craniofacial anomalies in Europe: A web based survey

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 83-89

  Nada, Rania M ^a   Sugar, Adrian W ^b   Wijdeveld, Maarten G M M ^a   Borstlap, Wilfred A ^a   Clauser, Luigi ^c   Hoffmeister, Bodo ^d   Kuijpers Jagtman, Anne Marie ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

craniofacial surgery; distraction osteogenesis; mandible; maxilla; survey; treatment protocols

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY; DEVICE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; EUROPE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT SELECTION; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CRANIOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; EUROPE; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; HUMANS; INTERNET; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; OSTEOTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SURGERY, ORAL;

EID: 76949094843     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chanchareonsook N., Whitehill T.L., and Samman N. Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis-early results. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 44 (2007) 23-32
2. Cheung L.K., and Chua H.D. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35 (2006) 14-24
3. Cheung L.K., Chua H.D., and Hagg M.B. Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery: clinical morbidities and surgical relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg 118 (2006) 996-1008
4. Chiapasco M., Zaniboni M., and Rimondini L. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 18 (2007) 432-440
5. Codivilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2 (1905) 353-357
6. Cohen S.R. Craniofacial distraction with a modular internal distraction system: evolution of design and surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 103 (1999) 1592-1607
7. Cope J.B., Samchukov M.L., and Cherkashin A.M. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a historic perspective and future directions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 (1999) 448-460
8. Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1989) 249-281
9. Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1989) 263-285
10. McCarthy J.G., Schreiber J., Karp N., Thorne C.H., and Grayson B.H. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 (1992) 1-8
11. McCarthy J.G., Stelnicki E.J., Mehrara B.J., and Longaker M.T. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 107 (2001) 1812-1827
12. Mofid M.M., Manson P.N., Robertson B.C., Tufaro A.P., Elias J.J., and Vander Kolk C.A. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 108 (2001) 1103-1114
13. Molina F., and Ortiz Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 96 (1995) 825-840
14. Mommaerts M.Y., and Nagy K. Is early osteodistraction a solution for the ascending ramus compartment in hemifacial microsomia? A literature study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 30 (2002) 201-207
15. Ow A.T., and Cheung L.K. Meta-analysis of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: clinical applications and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 121 (2008) 54e-69e
16. Schortinghuis J., Bronckers A.L., Stegenga B., Raghoebar G.M., and de Bont L.G. Ultrasound to stimulate early bone formation in a distraction gap: a double blind randomised clinical pilot trial in the edentulous mandible. Arch Oral Biol 50 (2005) 411-420
17. Schreuder W.H., Jansma J., Bierman M.W.J., and Vissink A. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36 (2007) 103-110
18. Shaw W.C., Mandall N.A., and Mattick C.R. Ethical and scientific decision making in distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 39 (2002) 641-645
19. Shaw W.C., Semb G., Nelson P., Brattstrom V., Molsted K., Prahl-Andersen B., and Gundlach K.K. The Eurocleft Project 1996-2000: overview. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 (2001) 131-140
20. Swennen G., Schliephake H., Dempf R., Schierle H., and Malevez C. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 89-103