Outcome of treatment of Class II malocclusion by intraoral mandibular distraction

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 520-525

  Breuning, K H ^a   van Strijen, P J ^b   Prahl Andersen, B ^c   Tuinzing, D B ^d  

^a Tiel 4001 LL   (Netherlands)

^b GELDERSE VALLEI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Class II; Mandibular distraction; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE RESECTION; ORTHODONTICS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 8644291070     PISSN: 02664356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-4356(04)00131-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. J.A. McNamara Jr. J. Peterson Jr. R.G. Alexander Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition Semin. Orthod. 2 1966 114-137
2. Tulloch JFC C. Phillips W.R. Proffit Benefit of early class II treatment: Progress report of two phase randomized clinical trials Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 113 1998 62-72
3. M. Lai J.A. Mc Namara Jr. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy Semin. Orthod. 1 1998 46-58
4. W.R. Proffit J.F.C. Tulloch Preadolescent class II problems: Treat now or wait Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 121 2003 560-562
5. C.J. Koroluj J.F.C. Tulloch C. Phillips Incisor trauma and early treatment for class II division 1 malocclusion Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 123 2003 117-125
6. J.F.C. Tulloch C. Phillips W.R. Proffit Benefit of early class II treatment: Progress report of a two phase randomized clinical trial Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 113 1998 62-72
7. H. Pancherz S. Ruf P. Kohlhaas Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: A chephalometric roentgenographic long-term treatment study Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 114 1998 437-446
8. L.R. Dermaut C.M.F. Aelbers Orthopedics in orthodontics: Part I. Fiction or reality-a review of the literature Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 110 1996 667-671
9. M. August J. Marchena J. Donady Neurosensory deficit and functional impairment after sagittal ramus osteotomy: A long-term follow-up study J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 56 1998 1231-1235
10. J.F. Honig U.A. Grohnmann H.A. Merten Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for lengthening the mandible to correct a malocclusion: A more than 70-year-old German concept in craniofacial surgery J. Craniofac. Surg. 13 2002 96-98
11. J.G. McCarthy J.S. Schreiber N.S. Karp C.H. Thorne B.H. Grayson Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 89 1992 1-8
12. B.C. Cope M.L. Samchukov A.M. Cherkashin Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: An historic perspective and future directions Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 115 1999 448-460
13. S. Dessner Y. Razdolsky T. El-Bialy C.A. Evans Mandibular lengthening using preprogrammed intraoral tooth-borne distraction devices J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 57 1999 1318-1322
14. E. Fisher D.A. Staffenberg J.G. McCarthy D.C. Miller J. Zeng Histopathological and biochemical changes in the muscles affected by distraction osteogenesis of the mandible J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 99 1997 366-371
15. P.J. van Strijen K.H. Breuning A.G. Becking F.B.T. Perdijk B.T. Tuinzing Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod. 96 2003 392-397
16. B. Kruse-Lösler U. Joos T. Meyer U. Meyer Temporomandibular joint alterations during distraction osteogenesis In: M.L. Samchukov J.B. Cope A.M. Cherkashin (Eds.) Craniofacial distraction, osteogenesis 2001 Mosby St Louis 118-127
17. K.H. Breuning P.J. van Strijen Orthodontic indications for mandibula distraction In: M.L. Schamchukov J.B. Cope AM. Cherkashin (Eds) Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis 29 2001 Mosby St Louis 278-285
18. P.J. van Strijen K.H. Breuning A.G. Becking D.B. Tuinzing Stability following distraction osteogenesis to lengthen the mandible: Results in fifty patients J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 62 2004 304-307
19. H. van Beek Overjet correction by a combined headgear and activator Eur. J. Orthod. 4 1982 279-290
20. J.C. Bennet R.P. McLaughlin Orthodontic treatment mechanics and the preadjusted appliance 1993 Mosby Wolfe London p. 24
21. P.J. van Strijen K.H. Breuning A.G. Becking F.B.T. Perdijk D.B. Tuinzing Cost, operation and hospitalisation time in distraction osteogenesis versus sagittal split osteotomy Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod. 4 2003 392-397
22. K.H. Breuning P.J. van Strijen B. Prahl-Andersen D.B. Tuinzing The overbite and intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 32 2004 119-125
23. P.H. Buschang L.G. Gandini Jr. Mandibular skeletal growth and modelling between 10 and 15 years of age Eur. J. Orthod. 24 2002 69-79
24. Van Sickels JE, Richardson RA, Stability of orthognathic surgery: A review of rigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;34:279-85