A contextual framework for understanding good practice in integrated catchment management

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 63-89

  Marshall, K ^a   Blackstock, K L ^a   Dunglinson, J ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Catchment management; Collaborative management; Good practice; Resource management; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; CATCHMENT; INTEGRATED APPROACH; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

EID: 74349093217     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560903399780     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abers, R.N., 2007. Organizing for governance: building collaboration in Brazilian river basins. World development, 35 (8), 1450-1463.
2. Achet, S.H. and Fleming, B., 2006. A watershed management framework for mountain areas: lessons from 25 years of watershed conservation in Nepal. Journal of environmental planning and management, 49 (5), 675-694.
3. Baril, P., Maranda, Y., and Baudrand, J., 2006. Integrated watershed management in Quebec (Canada): a participatory approach centred on local solidarity. Water science and technology, 53 (10), 301-307.
4. Beierle, T.C. and Konisky, D.M., 2000. Values, conflict and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of policy analysis and management, 19 (4), 587-602.
5. Blackmore, D.J., 1995. Murray-Darling Basin Commission: a case study of integrated catchment management. Water science and technology, 32 (5-6), 15-25.
6. Blackstock, K.L. and Richards, C., 2007. Evaluating stakeholder involvement in river basin planning: a Scottish case study. Water policy, 9, 493-512.
7. Broderick, K., 2005. Communities in catchments: implications for natural resource management. Australian geographical studies, 43 (3), 286-296.
8. Collins, K., 2004. The Tweed Forum and the Tweed Catchment Management Plan. SLIM (Social Learning for Integrated Management and Sustainable Use of Water at Catchment Scale) Case Study Monograph 10 [online]. Available from: http://slim.open.ac.uk/objects/Outcomes/SLIM%20CSM%2010%20-%20The%20Tweed,%20UK.pdf [Ac-cessed 5 March 2007].
9. Connick, S. and Innes, J.E., 2003. Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of environmental planning and management, 46 (2),177-197.
10. Davies, B., et al., 2004. Challenges in creating local agri-environmental cooperation action amongst farmers and other stakeholders. Final report to SEERAD. Aberdeen: Macaulay Institute.
11. de Groot, W.T. and Lenders, H.R.J., 2006. Emergent principles for river management. Hydrobiologia, 565, 309-316.
12. Dowsley, M., 2008. Developing multi-level institutions from top-down ancestors. International journal of the commons, 2 (1), 55-74.
13. Edelenbos, J. and Klijn, E.H., 2006. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16 (3), 417-446.
14. EKOS Consulting, 2006. Evaluation of the Mersey Basin Campaign Final Report. Government Office North West, UK [online]. Available from: http://www.gos.gov.uk/497468/docs/276882/436751 [Accessed 5 March 2007].
15. Ferreyra, C. and Beard, P., 2007. Participatory evaluation of collaborative and integrated water management: insights from the field. Journal of environmental planning and management, 50 (2), 271-296.
16. Fletcher, S., 2003. Stakeholder representation and the democratic basis of coastal partnerships in the UK. Marine policy, 27 (3), 229-240.
17. Fraser, E.D.G., et al., 2006. Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of environmental management, 78 (2), 114-127.
18. Fritsch, O. and Newig, J., 2006. Improving environmental quality through participation? A critical perspective on the effectiveness of public participation. In: PATH conference paper [online]. Available from: http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/pathconference/outputs/PATH_abstract_2.3.2.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2007].
19. Grant, A. and Curtis, A., 2004. Refining evaluation criteria for public participation using stakeholder perspectives of process and outcomes. Rural society, 24 (2), 142-160.
20. Gubbay, S., 2001. The role of Scottish local initiatives in implementing the principles of integrated coastal zone management. Countryside and Natural Heritage Research Programme Research Findings No.5. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.
21. HarmoniCOP, 2005. Collaborative planning: learning together to manage together - improving participation in water management. Germany: University of Osnabrück.
22. Hedelin, B., 2008. Criteria for the assessment of planning processes for sustainable river basin management. In: C. Pahl-Wostl, P. Kabat, and J. Moltgen, eds. Adaptive and integrated water management, coping with complexity and uncertainty. Berlin: Springer, 405-422.
23. Humphries, R. and Robinson, S., 1995. Assessment of the success of the Peel-Harvey estuary system management strategy - a Western Australian attempt at integrated catchment management. Water science and technology, 32 (5), 255-264.
24. Keough, H. and Blahna, D.J., 2006. Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conservation biology, 20, 1373-1382.
25. Kerr, J., 2007. Watershed management: lessons from common property theory. International journal of the commons, 1 (1), 81-110.
26. Koontz, T.M. and Thomas, C.W., 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public administration review, 66 (1),111-121.
27. Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., and Sabatier, P.A., 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of policy analysis and management, 21 (4), 645-670.
28. Maarleveld, M. and Dangbegnon, C., 1999. Managing natural resources: a social learning perspective. Agriculture and human values, 16, 267-280.
29. Margerum, R.D., 1999. Integrated environmental management: the foundations for successful practice. Environmental management, 24 (2), 151-166.
30. Margerum, R.D., 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental management, 41, 487-500.
31. Margerum, R.D. and Whitall, D., 2004. The challenges and implications of collaborative management on a river basin scale. Journal of environmental planning and management, 47 (3),407-427.
32. Measham, T.G., Kelly, G.J., and Smith, F.P., 2007. Best management practice for complex problems: a case study of defining BMP for dryland salinity. Geographical research, 45 (3), 262-272.
33. Mitchell, B., 2005. Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environment and planning A, 37 (8), 1335-1352.
34. Morris, C.T. and Morris, R.M., 2005. The Ythan Project: a case study on improving catchment management through community involvement. Journal of environmental planning and management, 48 (3), 413-429.
35. Newson, M. and Chalk, E., 2004. Environmental capital: an information core to public participation in strategic and operational decisions - the example of river 'Best Practice' projects. Journal of environmental planning and management, 47 (6), 899-920.
36. Nunneri, C. and Hofmann, J., 2005. A participatory approach for Integrated River Basin Management in the Elbe catchment. Estuarine coastal and shelf science, 62 (3), 521-537.
37. Oliver, P., 2001. What makes catchment management groups 'tick'? Water science and technology, 43 (9), 263-272.
38. Oliver, P., 2004. Developing effective partnerships in Natural Resource Management. In: C.A. Richards and L. Aitken, eds. Social innovations in natural resource management. Australia: CIRM (Department of Natural Resources and Mines), 58-60.
39. Orr, P., Colvin, J., and King, D., 2007. Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales. Water resource management, 21, 331-349.
40. Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L., 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: A. Bryman and R.G. Burgess, eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 173-194.
41. Sabatier, P.A., et al., 2005. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Said, A., et al., 2006. Exploring an innovative watershed management approach: from feasibility to sustainability. Energy, 31 (13), 2037-2050.
43. Selin, S. and Chavez, D., 1995. Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental management, 19, 189-195.
44. Selin, S.W., Schuett, M.A., and Carr, D., 2000. Modeling stakeholder perceptions of collaborative initiative effectiveness. Society and natural resources, 13, 735-745.
45. Sidaway, R., 2005. Resolving environmental disputes: from conflict to consensus. London: Earthscan, 49-52.
46. SLIM, 2004. Policy Briefing Number 3 [online]. Available from: http://slim.open.ac.uk/objects/public/slim-pb3-final-screen.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2007].
47. Tippett, J., 2005. Participatory planning in river catchments, an innovative toolkit tested in Southern Africa and North West England. Water science and technology, 52 (9), 95-105.
48. Videira, N., et al., 2006. Public and stakeholder participation in European water policy: a critical review of project evaluation processes. European environment, 16 (1), 19-31.
49. Warner, J.F., 2006. More sustainable participation? Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management. International journal of water resources development, 22,15-35.
50. White, A., et al., 2006. Integrated coastal management in Philippine local governance: evolution and benefits. Coastal management, 34, 287-302.
51. Witter, J.V., van Stokkom, H.T.C., and Hendriksen, G., 2006. From river management to river basin management: a water manager's perspective. Hydrobiologia, 565, 317-325.
52. WWF, 2001. Elements of good practice in integrated river basin management 2001: a practical resource for implementing the EU WFD. Brussles: WWF.