Comparative study of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and open wertheim-meigs in patients with early-stage cervical cancer eleven years of experience

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 173-178

  Pahisa, Jaume ^a   Martínez Román, Sergio ^a   Torné, Aureli ^a   Fusté, Pere ^a   Alonso, Inmaculada ^a   Lejárcegui, Jose Antonio ^a   Balasch, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Surgical complications; Treatment outcome; Uterine cervical neoplasms; Vaginal hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CANCER RECURRENCE; COELIO SCHAUTA PROCEDURE; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL CYSTOTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE FUNCTION; INTESTINE INJURY; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED RADICAL VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPEN WERTHEIM MEIGS; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM INJURY; SAFETY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TUMOR VOLUME; URETER INJURY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 74249120582     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bf80ee     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operations for carcinoma uteri (based on 5000 operative cases). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1921;66:169.
2. Schauta F. Die operation des gebaermutterkrebs mittel des schuchardtschen paravaginalschnittes. Monatsschr Geburtshiffe Gynaekol. 1902;15:133-152.
3. Meigs J. The Wertheim operation for carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1945;40:542-543.
4. Dargent D. A new future for Schautas's operation through presurgical retroperitoneal pelviscopy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1987;8:292-296.
5. Querleu D. Hystérectomies élargies de Schauta-Amreich et Schauta-Stoeckel assistées par coelioscopie. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1991;20:747-748.
6. Querleu D. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51:248-254.
7. Dargent D, Mathevet P. Hystérectomie élargie laparoscopico-vaginale. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1992;21: 709-710.
8. Querleu D, Leblanc E, Castelain B. Laparoscopic pelvic lympahdenectomy in the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;164:579-581.
9. Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, et al. Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19:921.
10. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Welander C. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:864-865.
11. Dargent D, Brun JL, Roy M, et al. La trachélectomie élargie, une alternative à l'hysterectomie radicale dans le traitement des cancers infiltrants développés sur la face externe du col utérin. J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;2:285-292.
12. Renaud MC, Plante M, Roy M. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:59-63. (Pubitemid 30780158)
13. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129-133. (Pubitemid 38117458)
14. Roy M, Plante M, Renaud MC, et al. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62:336-339.
15. Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopic-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:277-283.
16. Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:588-593.
17. Jackson KS, Das N, Naik R, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95:655-661.
18. Sharma R, Bailey J, Anderson R, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): a comparison with openWertheim/Meigs hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1927-1932.
19. Morgan DJ, Hunter DC, McCracken G, et al. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow-up. BJOG. 2007;114: 537-542.
20. Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:289-292.
21. Hertel H, Köhler C, Michels W, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:505-511.
22. Sardi J, Vidaurreta J, Bermüdez A, et al. Laparoscopically assisted Schauta operation: learning experience at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Buenos Aires University Hospital. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75:361-365.
23. Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, Black D, et al. Fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical carcinoma: technique and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:807-813.