Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): A comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1927-1932

  Sharma, R ^a   Bailey, J ^a   Anderson, R ^a   Murdoch, J ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer; Cervix; Coelio Schauta; Hysterectomy; Wertheims

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLADDER DYSFUNCTION; BLEEDING; BODY WEIGHT; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EARLY CANCER; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RECURRENCE RISK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME; URINARY TRACT INJURY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33749139136     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00661.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wertheim E. Zur Frage der Radikaloperation beim Uteruskrebs. Arch Gynakol 1900;61:627
2. Schauta F. Die operation des Gebarmutterkrebes mittels des Schuchardt'schen Paravaginalschnittes. Montasschr. Geburtsh. In Gynak 1902;15:133-52.
3. Meigs JV. Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic node dissection. Report on 100 patients operated on 5 years or more. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1944;62:854-66.
4. Querleu D. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1993;51:248-54.
5. Roy M, Plante M, Renaud MC, Tetu B. Vaginal radical hysterectomy vs. abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996;62:336-9.
6. Schneider A, Possover M, Kamprath S, Endisch U, Krause N, Noschel H. Laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy modified according to Schauta-Stoeckel. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:1057-60.
7. Gil-Moreno A, Puig O, Perez-Benavente MA et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:113-20.
8. Liang ZQ, Chen Y, Xu HC et al. Complication of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: an analysis of 23 cases. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2005;40:438-40.
9. Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Levenback C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the MD Anderson Cancer Centre Experience, Gynecol Oncol 2006 (epub ahead of print).
10. Monaghan JM. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection. In: Monaghan JM, ed. Bonney's gynaecological surgery, chapter 11. London (UK): Bailliere Tindall, 1986:95-107.
11. Jackson KS, Das N, Naik R et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study. Gynecol Oncol 2004;95:655-61.
12. Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY et al. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92:277-83.
13. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al. The eVALuate study: 2 parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, and the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 2004;328:129-33.
14. Possover M, Krause N, Kuhne-Reid R, Schneider A. Laparoscopic assistance for extended radicality of radical vaginal hysterectomy: description of a technique. Gynecol Oncol 1998;70:94-9.
15. Renaud MC, Plante M, Roy M. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:59-63.
16. Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, De Petrillo D, Covens A. A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:586-7.
17. Hertel H, Kohler C, Michels W, Possover M, Tozzi R, Schneider A. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:505-11.
18. Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 2001;15:289-92.
19. Sardi J, Vidauretta J, Bermudez A, di Paola G. Laparoscopically assisted Schauta operation: learning experience at the Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Buenos Aires University Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 1997;75:361-5.
20. Lee CL, Huang KG, Jain S, Lee PS, Soong YK. Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002;9:481-7.
21. Chenofsky MR, Felix JC, Muderspach LI et al. Influence of quantity of lymph vascular space invasion on time to recurrence in women with early stage squamous cancer of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2005;100:288-93.
22. Marchiole P, Buenerd A, Benchaib M, Nezhat K, Dargent D, Mathevet P. Clinical significance of lymphovascular space involvement and lymph node micrometastases in early stage cervical cancer: a retrospective case control surgico-pathological study. Gynecol Oncol 2005;97:727-32.
23. Creasman WT, Kohler MF. Is lymph vascular space involvement an independent prognostic factor in early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92:525-9.