A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: Methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 126, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 976-984

  Mittra, Indraneel ^a   Mishra, Gauravi A ^a   Singh, Shalini ^b   Aranke, Sangeeta ^c   Notani, Perin ^a   Badwe, Rajendra ^a   Miller, Anthony B ^d   Daniel, Elkan E ^e   Gupta, Subhadra ^a   Uplap, Pallavi ^a   Thakur, Meenakshi H ^a   Ramani, Subhash ^a   Kerkar, Rajendra ^a   Ganesh, Balasubramanian ^a   Shastri, Surendra S ^a  

^a TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (India)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Ram Maruti Eye Hospital and Polyclinic   (India)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Cancer; CBE; Cervix; RCT; Screening; VIA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INDIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORTALITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INCOME; INDIA; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REGISTRIES; SOCIAL WORK; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 74049158195     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24840     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Stewart BS, Kleihues P, eds. Cancers of female reproductive tract. In: World Cancer Report, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research in Cancer. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2003. 215-22.
2. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw K, Rajkumar R, Shastri S, Wesley R, Basu P, Sharma R, Thara S, Budukh A, Parkin DM. Early detection of cervical cancer with visual inspection methods: a summary of completed and on-going studies in India. Salud. Publica Mex 2003;45(Suppl 2): S274-S282.
3. Dinshaw KA, Rao DN, Ganesh B. Tata Memorial Hospital Cancer Registry Annual Report, Mumbai, India, 1999. 52.
4. Yeole BB, Jussawalla DJ, Sabnis SD, Sunny L. Survival from breast and cervical cancers in Mumbai (Bombay), India. In: Sankaranarayanan R, Black RJ, Parkin DM, eds. Cancer survival in developing countries. IARC, Scientific Publication No. 145, International Agency for Research in Cancer, Lyon, France, 1998. 79-90.
5. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2000: cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence worldwide 2001; Version 1.0. IARC Cancer Base No. 5. Lyon:IARC Press.
6. Sasco AJ. Epidemiology of breast cancer: an environmental disease? APMIS 2001; 109:321-32.
7. Martin-Hirsch P, Lilford R, Jarvis G, Kitchner HC. Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 1999;354:1763-70.
8. Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Somanathan T, Dhakad N, Shyamalakumary B, Amma NS, Parkin DM, Nair MK. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors. Cancer 1998;83: 2150-56.
9. University of Zimbabwe/JHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project. Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care setting. Lancet 1999;353:869-73.
10. Belinson JL, Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Wu LY, Qiao YL, Elson P. Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:441-44.
11. Shastri SS, Dinshaw K, Amin G, Goswami S, Patil S, Chinoy R, Kane S, Kelkar R, Muwonge R, Mahe C, Ajit D, Sankaranarayanan R. Concurrent evaluation of visual, cytological and HPV testing as screening methods for the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Mumbai, India. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:186-94.
12. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Ngelangel C, Esteban D, Gibson L, Munson M, Reyes MG, Laudico A. Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines. Int J Cancer 2006;118: 149-54.
13. Oestreicher N, Lehman CD, Seger DJ, Buist DS, White E. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:428-32.
14. Fenton JJ, Barton MB, Geiger AM, Herrinton LJ, Rolnick SJ, Harris EL, Barlow WE, Reish LM, Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005:67-71.
15. Bobo JK, Lawson HW, Lee NC. Risk factors for failure to detect a cancer during clinical breast examinations (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2003;14: 461-8.
16. Oestreicher N, White E, Lehman CD, Mandelson MT, Porter PL, Taplin SH. Predictors of sensitivity of clinical breast examination (CBE). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;76:73-81.
17. Miller AB. Screening in developing countries: problems and opportunities. Cancer Treat Res 1996;86:183-9.
18. McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Jolitz G, Murray CL. Survival of women ages 40-49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection. Cancer 1997;79: 1923-32.
19. Sankaranarayanan R,Wesley R, eds. A practical manual on visual screening for neoplasia. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003.
20. Scutt D, Lancaster GA, Manning JT. Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2006;8:R14.