The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 184, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 428-432

  Oestreicher, Nina ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^c   Seger, Deborah J ^d   Buist, Diana S M ^d,e   White, Emily ^e,f  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^f Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER INVASION; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 15944387040     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840428     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Miller AB, Baines CJ, Turnbull C. The role of the nurse-examiner in the National Breast Screening Study. Can J Public Health 1991;82:162-167
2. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 1999;282:1270-1280
3. Green BB, Taplin SH. Breast cancer screening controversies. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003;16:233-241
4. Bancej C, Decker K, Chiarelli A, Harrison M, Turner D, Brisson J. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen 2003;10:16-21
5. Bobo JK, Lee NC, Thames SF. Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:971-976
6. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L. Screening for breast cancer: the Health Insurance Plan Project and its sequelae, 1963-1986. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988
7. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:344-346
8. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165-175
9. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF. Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:781-785
10. Peer PG, Verbeek AL, Straatman H, Hendriks JH, Holland R. Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;38:153-160
11. Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 1998;209:511-518
12. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087
13. Oestreicher N, White E, Lehman CD, Mandelson MT, Porter PL, Taplin SH. Predictors of sensitivity of clinical breast examination (CBE). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;76:73-81
14. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:168-175
15. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995
16. Chamberlain J, Clifford RE, Nathan BE, Price JL, Burn I. Error-rates in screening for breast cancer by clinical examination and mammography. Clin Oncol 1979;5:135-146
17. Baker LH. Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin 1982;32:194-225
18. Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, et al. Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 1990;335:241-246
19. Baines CJ, Miller AB. Mammography versus clinical examination of the breasts. (review) J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;22:125-129
20. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:141-169
21. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA 1993;270:2444-2450
22. Reeves MJ, Newcomb PA, Remington PL, Marcus PM. Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988-90. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:103-111
23. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276:33-38
24. Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Geller B, et al. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:855-863
25. Nixon RM, Pharoah P, Tabar L, et al. Mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer: some results from the Swedish two-county trial. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2000;48:325-331
26. Halapy EE, Chiarelli AM, Klar N, Knight J. Breast screening outcomes in women with and without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. J Med Screen 2004;11:32-38
27. Benedict S, Williams RD, Hoomani J. Method of discovery of breast cancer. Cancer Pract 1996;4:147-155
28. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Bassett AA. Physical examination: its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer 1989;63:1816-1822