Predictors of sensitivity of clinical breast examination (CBE)

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 73-81

  Oestreicher, Nina ^a,b,c   White, Emily ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^d   Mandelson, Margaret T ^a,b,e   Porter, Peggy L ^a,d   Taplin, Stephen H ^d,e  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b Department of Epidemiology ^*  (United States)

^c Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast density; Cancer prevention; Clinical breast examination; Physical examination; Screening

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN; PROGESTERONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; WASHINGTON;

EID: 0036838071     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020280623807     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW: Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 282: 1270-1280, 1999
2. Bostick RM, Sprafka JM, Virnig BA, Potter JD: Knowledge, attitudes, and personal practices regarding prevention and early detection of cancer. Prev Med 22: 65-85, 1993
3. Report of the Working Group to Review the National Cancer Institute - American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. J Natl Cancer Inst 62: 639-709, 1979
4. Miller AB, Baines CJ, Turnbull C: The role of the nurse-examiner in the National Breast Screening Study. Can J Public Health 82: 162-167, 1991
5. Greenwald P, Nasca PC, Lawrence CE, Horton J, McGarrah RP, Gabriele T, Carlton K: Estimated effect of breast self-examination and routine physician examinations on breast-cancer mortality. N Engl J Med 299: 271-273, 1978
6. Senie RT, Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Kinne DW: Breast self-examination and medical examination related to breast cancer stage. Am J Public Health 71: 583-590, 1981
7. Campbell HS, Fletcher SW, Pilgrim CA, Morgan TM, Lin S: Improving physicians' and nurses' clinical breast examination: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 7: 1-8, 1991
8. Fletcher SW, O'Malley MS, Bunce LA: Physicians' abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models. JAMA 253: 2224-2228, 1985
9. Hicks MJ, Davis JR, Layton JM, Present AJ: Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer. JAMA 242: 2080-2083, 1979
10. Bender HG, Schnurch HG, Beck L: Breast cancer detection: age-related significance of findings on physical exam and mammography. Gynecol Oncol 31: 166-175, 1988
11. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Bassett AA: Physical examination. Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer 63: 1816-1822, 1989
12. Bobo JK, Lee NC, Thames SF: Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 971-976, 2000
13. Taplin SH, Mandelson MT, Anderman C, White E, Thompson RS, Timlin D, Wagner EH: Mammography diffusion and trends in late-stage breast cancer: evaluating outcomes in a population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6: 625-631, 1997
14. Humphrey LL, Ballard DJ: Early detection of breast cancer in women. Primary Care Clinics Office Pract 16: 115-132, 1989
15. Peer PG, van Dijck JA, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Verbeek AL: Age-dependent growth rate of primary breast cancer. Cancer 71: 3547-3551, 1993
16. Seidman H, Gelb SK, Silverberg E, LaVerda N, Lubera JA: Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA Cancer J Clin 37: 258-290, 1987
17. Goodson III WH: Clinical breast examination. West J Med 164: 355-358, 1996
18. El-Bastawissi AY, White E, Mandelson MT, Taplin SH: Reproductive and hormonal factors associated with mammographic breast density by age (United States). Cancer Causes Contr 11: 955-963, 2000
19. Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT, Lin MG, Khalid N, Watney EA: Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 2020-2028, 1999
20. Thurfjell E, Hsieh CC, Lipworth L, Ekbom A, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D: Breast size and mammographic pattern in relation to breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev 5: 37-41, 1996
21. Hoe AL, Mullee MA, Royle GT, Guyer PB, Taylor I: Breast size and prognosis in early breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75: 18-22, 1993
22. Reeves MJ, Newcomb PA, Remington PL, Marcus PM, MacKenzie WR: Body mass and breast cancer. Relationship between method of detection and stage of disease. Cancer 77: 301-307, 1996
23. Hall HI, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Brinton LA, Gammon MD, Brogan D, Potischman N, Malone KE, Swanson CA: Stage of breast cancer in relation to body mass index and bra cup size. Int J Cancer 82: 23-27, 1999
24. McDermott MM, Dolan NC, Huang J, Reifler D, Rademaker AW: Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue. J Gen Int Med 11(2): 112-114, 1996
25. Kavanagh AM, Mitchell H, Giles GG: Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening. Lancet 355: 270-274, 2000